Evaluating the Good Ontology Design Guideline (GoodOD) with the ontology quality requirements and evaluation method and metrics (OQuaRE).
<h4>Objective</h4>To (1) evaluate the GoodOD guideline for ontology development by applying the OQuaRE evaluation method and metrics to the ontology artefacts that were produced by students in a randomized controlled trial, and (2) informally compare the OQuaRE evaluation method with gol...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Astrid Duque-Ramos, Martin Boeker, Ludger Jansen, Stefan Schulz, Miguela Iniesta, Jesualdo Tomás Fernández-Breis |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Language: | EN |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/e1a3db713a284299a76e9a1ccd5a8c7c |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Effects of guideline-based training on the quality of formal ontologies: a randomized controlled trial.
by: Martin Boeker, et al.
Published: (2013) -
Institutional Ontology as an Ontology of Types
by: Lorenzo Passerini Glazel
Published: (2016) -
FIVE ONTOLOGICAL LEVELS TO DESCRIBE AND EVALUATE SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURES
by: Astudillo,Hernán
Published: (2005) -
Applied ontology
Published: (2005) -
ONTOLOGY INNOVATION MANAGEMENT
by: V. Ukolov, et al.
Published: (2016)