Microstructural and Chemical Characteristics of Archaeological White Elm (<i>Ulmus laevis</i> P.) and Poplar (<i>Populus</i> spp.)
The degradation states of archaeological white elm, with an age estimation of ~350 years, and poplar, with an age approximation of ~1000–1200 years, were studied by means of different chemical and microscopy analyses. Recently cut samples from the respective species were used for comparison reasons....
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/e1abf72f3e064cc79b97d95133b95a75 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:e1abf72f3e064cc79b97d95133b95a75 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:e1abf72f3e064cc79b97d95133b95a752021-11-11T15:18:35ZMicrostructural and Chemical Characteristics of Archaeological White Elm (<i>Ulmus laevis</i> P.) and Poplar (<i>Populus</i> spp.)10.3390/app1121102712076-3417https://doaj.org/article/e1abf72f3e064cc79b97d95133b95a752021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/21/10271https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3417The degradation states of archaeological white elm, with an age estimation of ~350 years, and poplar, with an age approximation of ~1000–1200 years, were studied by means of different chemical and microscopy analyses. Recently cut samples from the respective species were used for comparison reasons. The chemical composition analysis of the archaeological samples showed significantly low holocellulose values, while the lignin, extractive, and ash contents were considerably high, as compared with the recently cut samples. The Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy also confirmed the changes in the chemical structure of the archaeological elm and poplar samples. The light and scanning electron microscopies illustrated that the erosion bacteria were the main degrading agent in both archaeological elm and poplar, although the hyphae of rot fungi were detected inside the vessel elements of the archaeological poplar sample.Amir GhavidelReza HosseinpourpiaJana GelbrichMiklós BakIon SanduMDPI AGarticlearchaeological woodbiological degradationFTIRlight microscopySEMTechnologyTEngineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040Biology (General)QH301-705.5PhysicsQC1-999ChemistryQD1-999ENApplied Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 10271, p 10271 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
archaeological wood biological degradation FTIR light microscopy SEM Technology T Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Physics QC1-999 Chemistry QD1-999 |
spellingShingle |
archaeological wood biological degradation FTIR light microscopy SEM Technology T Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Biology (General) QH301-705.5 Physics QC1-999 Chemistry QD1-999 Amir Ghavidel Reza Hosseinpourpia Jana Gelbrich Miklós Bak Ion Sandu Microstructural and Chemical Characteristics of Archaeological White Elm (<i>Ulmus laevis</i> P.) and Poplar (<i>Populus</i> spp.) |
description |
The degradation states of archaeological white elm, with an age estimation of ~350 years, and poplar, with an age approximation of ~1000–1200 years, were studied by means of different chemical and microscopy analyses. Recently cut samples from the respective species were used for comparison reasons. The chemical composition analysis of the archaeological samples showed significantly low holocellulose values, while the lignin, extractive, and ash contents were considerably high, as compared with the recently cut samples. The Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy also confirmed the changes in the chemical structure of the archaeological elm and poplar samples. The light and scanning electron microscopies illustrated that the erosion bacteria were the main degrading agent in both archaeological elm and poplar, although the hyphae of rot fungi were detected inside the vessel elements of the archaeological poplar sample. |
format |
article |
author |
Amir Ghavidel Reza Hosseinpourpia Jana Gelbrich Miklós Bak Ion Sandu |
author_facet |
Amir Ghavidel Reza Hosseinpourpia Jana Gelbrich Miklós Bak Ion Sandu |
author_sort |
Amir Ghavidel |
title |
Microstructural and Chemical Characteristics of Archaeological White Elm (<i>Ulmus laevis</i> P.) and Poplar (<i>Populus</i> spp.) |
title_short |
Microstructural and Chemical Characteristics of Archaeological White Elm (<i>Ulmus laevis</i> P.) and Poplar (<i>Populus</i> spp.) |
title_full |
Microstructural and Chemical Characteristics of Archaeological White Elm (<i>Ulmus laevis</i> P.) and Poplar (<i>Populus</i> spp.) |
title_fullStr |
Microstructural and Chemical Characteristics of Archaeological White Elm (<i>Ulmus laevis</i> P.) and Poplar (<i>Populus</i> spp.) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Microstructural and Chemical Characteristics of Archaeological White Elm (<i>Ulmus laevis</i> P.) and Poplar (<i>Populus</i> spp.) |
title_sort |
microstructural and chemical characteristics of archaeological white elm (<i>ulmus laevis</i> p.) and poplar (<i>populus</i> spp.) |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/e1abf72f3e064cc79b97d95133b95a75 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT amirghavidel microstructuralandchemicalcharacteristicsofarchaeologicalwhiteelmiulmuslaevisipandpoplaripopulusispp AT rezahosseinpourpia microstructuralandchemicalcharacteristicsofarchaeologicalwhiteelmiulmuslaevisipandpoplaripopulusispp AT janagelbrich microstructuralandchemicalcharacteristicsofarchaeologicalwhiteelmiulmuslaevisipandpoplaripopulusispp AT miklosbak microstructuralandchemicalcharacteristicsofarchaeologicalwhiteelmiulmuslaevisipandpoplaripopulusispp AT ionsandu microstructuralandchemicalcharacteristicsofarchaeologicalwhiteelmiulmuslaevisipandpoplaripopulusispp |
_version_ |
1718435529558589440 |