Sexual dimorphism in bite performance drives morphological variation in chameleons.

Phenotypic performance in different environments is central to understanding the evolutionary and ecological processes that drive adaptive divergence and, ultimately, speciation. Because habitat structure can affect an animal's foraging behaviour, anti-predator defences, and communication behav...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jessica M da Silva, Anthony Herrel, G John Measey, Krystal A Tolley
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e1befd407fc14a418b20b71efcfd86f6
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e1befd407fc14a418b20b71efcfd86f6
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e1befd407fc14a418b20b71efcfd86f62021-11-18T08:35:38ZSexual dimorphism in bite performance drives morphological variation in chameleons.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0086846https://doaj.org/article/e1befd407fc14a418b20b71efcfd86f62014-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24475183/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Phenotypic performance in different environments is central to understanding the evolutionary and ecological processes that drive adaptive divergence and, ultimately, speciation. Because habitat structure can affect an animal's foraging behaviour, anti-predator defences, and communication behaviour, it can influence both natural and sexual selection pressures. These selective pressures, in turn, act upon morphological traits to maximize an animal's performance. For performance traits involved in both social and ecological activities, such as bite force, natural and sexual selection often interact in complex ways, providing an opportunity to understand the adaptive significance of morphological variation with respect to habitat. Dwarf chameleons within the Bradypodion melanocephalum-Bradypodion thamnobates species complex have multiple phenotypic forms, each with a specific head morphology that could reflect its use of either open- or closed-canopy habitats. To determine whether these morphological differences represent adaptations to their habitats, we tested for differences in both absolute and relative bite performance. Only absolute differences were found between forms, with the closed-canopy forms biting harder than their open-canopy counterparts. In contrast, sexual dimorphism was found for both absolute and relative bite force, but the relative differences were limited to the closed-canopy forms. These results indicate that both natural and sexual selection are acting within both habitat types, but to varying degrees. Sexual selection seems to be the predominant force within the closed-canopy habitats, which are more protected from aerial predators, enabling chameleons to invest more in ornamentation for communication. In contrast, natural selection is likely to be the predominant force in the open-canopy habitats, inhibiting the development of conspicuous secondary sexual characteristics and, ultimately, enforcing their overall diminutive body size and constraining performance.Jessica M da SilvaAnthony HerrelG John MeaseyKrystal A TolleyPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 1, p e86846 (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Jessica M da Silva
Anthony Herrel
G John Measey
Krystal A Tolley
Sexual dimorphism in bite performance drives morphological variation in chameleons.
description Phenotypic performance in different environments is central to understanding the evolutionary and ecological processes that drive adaptive divergence and, ultimately, speciation. Because habitat structure can affect an animal's foraging behaviour, anti-predator defences, and communication behaviour, it can influence both natural and sexual selection pressures. These selective pressures, in turn, act upon morphological traits to maximize an animal's performance. For performance traits involved in both social and ecological activities, such as bite force, natural and sexual selection often interact in complex ways, providing an opportunity to understand the adaptive significance of morphological variation with respect to habitat. Dwarf chameleons within the Bradypodion melanocephalum-Bradypodion thamnobates species complex have multiple phenotypic forms, each with a specific head morphology that could reflect its use of either open- or closed-canopy habitats. To determine whether these morphological differences represent adaptations to their habitats, we tested for differences in both absolute and relative bite performance. Only absolute differences were found between forms, with the closed-canopy forms biting harder than their open-canopy counterparts. In contrast, sexual dimorphism was found for both absolute and relative bite force, but the relative differences were limited to the closed-canopy forms. These results indicate that both natural and sexual selection are acting within both habitat types, but to varying degrees. Sexual selection seems to be the predominant force within the closed-canopy habitats, which are more protected from aerial predators, enabling chameleons to invest more in ornamentation for communication. In contrast, natural selection is likely to be the predominant force in the open-canopy habitats, inhibiting the development of conspicuous secondary sexual characteristics and, ultimately, enforcing their overall diminutive body size and constraining performance.
format article
author Jessica M da Silva
Anthony Herrel
G John Measey
Krystal A Tolley
author_facet Jessica M da Silva
Anthony Herrel
G John Measey
Krystal A Tolley
author_sort Jessica M da Silva
title Sexual dimorphism in bite performance drives morphological variation in chameleons.
title_short Sexual dimorphism in bite performance drives morphological variation in chameleons.
title_full Sexual dimorphism in bite performance drives morphological variation in chameleons.
title_fullStr Sexual dimorphism in bite performance drives morphological variation in chameleons.
title_full_unstemmed Sexual dimorphism in bite performance drives morphological variation in chameleons.
title_sort sexual dimorphism in bite performance drives morphological variation in chameleons.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/e1befd407fc14a418b20b71efcfd86f6
work_keys_str_mv AT jessicamdasilva sexualdimorphisminbiteperformancedrivesmorphologicalvariationinchameleons
AT anthonyherrel sexualdimorphisminbiteperformancedrivesmorphologicalvariationinchameleons
AT gjohnmeasey sexualdimorphisminbiteperformancedrivesmorphologicalvariationinchameleons
AT krystalatolley sexualdimorphisminbiteperformancedrivesmorphologicalvariationinchameleons
_version_ 1718421593714065408