Machine learning applications to predict two-phase flow patterns

Recent advances in artificial intelligence with traditional machine learning algorithms and deep learning architectures solve complex classification problems. This work presents the performance of different artificial intelligence models to classify two-phase flow patterns, showing the best alternat...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harold Brayan Arteaga-Arteaga, Alejandro Mora-Rubio, Frank Florez, Nicolas Murcia-Orjuela, Cristhian Eduardo Diaz-Ortega, Simon Orozco-Arias, Melissa delaPava, Mario Alejandro Bravo-Ortíz, Melvin Robinson, Pablo Guillen-Rondon, Reinel Tabares-Soto
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e1d8468b25c0456492404d1fa7d1a9e8
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Recent advances in artificial intelligence with traditional machine learning algorithms and deep learning architectures solve complex classification problems. This work presents the performance of different artificial intelligence models to classify two-phase flow patterns, showing the best alternatives for this specific classification problem using two-phase flow regimes (liquid and gas) in pipes. Flow patterns are affected by physical variables such as superficial velocity, viscosity, density, and superficial tension. They also depend on the construction characteristics of the pipe, such as the angle of inclination and the diameter. We selected 12 databases (9,029 samples) to train and test machine learning models, considering these variables that influence the flow patterns. The primary dataset is Shoham (1982), containing 5,675 samples with six different flow patterns. An extensive set of metrics validated the results obtained. The most relevant characteristics for training the models using Shoham (1982) dataset are gas and liquid superficial velocities, angle of inclination, and diameter. Regarding the algorithms, the Extra Trees model classifies the flow patterns with the highest degree of fidelity, achieving an accuracy of 98.8%.