Comparing exploratory factor models of the Brief Electricity and Magnetism Assessment and the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
While numerous studies have analyzed the conceptions probed by the Force Concept Inventory (FCI), assessments dedicated to electricity and magnetism lack similar analyses. This paper investigated the conceptions explored by the Brief Electricity and Magnetism Assessment (BEMA) and the Conceptual Sur...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Philip Eaton, Barrett Frank, Keith Johnson, Shannon Willoughby |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
American Physical Society
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/e1e12dfaec0f42a68909c20c4f49dae1 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Applying module analysis to the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
por: Christopher Wheatley, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Multidimensional item response theory and the Brief Electricity and Magnetism Assessment
por: John Hansen, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Assessing the longitudinal measurement invariance of the Force Concept Inventory and the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
por: Yang Xiao, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Phenomenographic analysis and comparison of students’ conceptual understanding of electric and magnetic fields and the principle of superposition
por: Esmeralda Campos, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Magnetic and electrical separation
Publicado: (1991)