Subjective Perception Of Trifocal IOL Performance, Including Toric Models

Islam Mahmoud Hamdi1,2 1Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt; 2Ophthalmology Consultant, The Eye Consultants Center, Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaCorrespondence: Islam Mahmoud HamdiThe Eye Consultants Center, PO Box 15637, Jeddah 21454, Saudi ArabiaTel +966 12 556...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Hamdi IM
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Dove Medical Press 2019
Materias:	Panoptix – Trifocal – toric -subjective Ophthalmology RE1-994
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/e1eedee1cfaf423ca9dacd9cbdbfe586
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:e1eedee1cfaf423ca9dacd9cbdbfe586
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:e1eedee1cfaf423ca9dacd9cbdbfe5862021-12-02T04:04:27ZSubjective Perception Of Trifocal IOL Performance, Including Toric Models1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/e1eedee1cfaf423ca9dacd9cbdbfe5862019-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/subjective-perception-of-trifocal-iol-performance-including-toric-mode-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Islam Mahmoud Hamdi1,2 1Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt; 2Ophthalmology Consultant, The Eye Consultants Center, Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaCorrespondence: Islam Mahmoud HamdiThe Eye Consultants Center, PO Box 15637, Jeddah 21454, Saudi ArabiaTel +966 12 556888135Email islammhamdi@hotmail.comPurpose: To study the patients’ perception of trifocal IOL (Panoptix™) performance.Patients and methods: 60 eyes of 35 were implanted with trifocal IOL. Refractive (sphere – S, cylinder – Cyl and spherical equivalent – SE, all in D) and visual (distance uncorrected – VAsc, distance corrected – VAcc, intermediate – IntVA, near uncorrected – NVAsc and distance corrected near – NVAcc, all in LogMAR) results were recorded. Patients were asked about satisfaction (per eye), spectacle independence, near and intermediate activities, distance activities in quantity and quality, finally about personal facial care (per patient). Comparison was made between non-toric (48) and toric models, genders (18 males) and between bilateral (25 patients) and unilateral implantations. Results were correlated to age and IOL power.Results: With a SE of mean −0.3 ± 0.5 D, cases achieved mean VAsc 0.09 ± 0.1 (&sim;20/25), VAcc 0.05 ± 0.1 (&sim;20/22), IntVA 0.05 ± 0.9 (&sim;20/22), NVAsc 0.05 ± 0.09 (&sim;̴20/22) and NVAcc 0.04 ± 0.8 (̴&sim;20/22). Mean level of satisfaction was 85.7 ± 16.5, spectacle independence 96.0 ± 10.6, near activities 95.4 ± 9.8, intermediate activities 97.7 ± 6.4, quantity of distance activities 90.2 ± 10.1, quality of distance activities 88.0 ± 12.1 and facial care 92.6 ± 11.9. All comparisons (non-toric and toric, male and female and bilateral and unilateral implantation) were statistically insignificant (P>0.05). Correlation with age and IOL power was also statistically insignificant (P>0.05).Conclusion: As perceived by patients, trifocal IOL resulted in very high level of satisfaction. This satisfaction is reflected on diverse visual activities. This level is achieved regardless of gender, IOL model or even unilateral implantation. It is also achieved regardless the age of patients or preoperative eye status.Keywords: Panoptix, trifocal, toric, subjectiveHamdi IMDove Medical PressarticlePanoptix – Trifocal – toric -subjectiveOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 13, Pp 1955-1961 (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Panoptix – Trifocal – toric -subjective Ophthalmology RE1-994
spellingShingle	Panoptix – Trifocal – toric -subjective Ophthalmology RE1-994 Hamdi IM Subjective Perception Of Trifocal IOL Performance, Including Toric Models
description	Islam Mahmoud Hamdi1,2 1Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt; 2Ophthalmology Consultant, The Eye Consultants Center, Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaCorrespondence: Islam Mahmoud HamdiThe Eye Consultants Center, PO Box 15637, Jeddah 21454, Saudi ArabiaTel +966 12 556888135Email islammhamdi@hotmail.comPurpose: To study the patients’ perception of trifocal IOL (Panoptix™) performance.Patients and methods: 60 eyes of 35 were implanted with trifocal IOL. Refractive (sphere – S, cylinder – Cyl and spherical equivalent – SE, all in D) and visual (distance uncorrected – VAsc, distance corrected – VAcc, intermediate – IntVA, near uncorrected – NVAsc and distance corrected near – NVAcc, all in LogMAR) results were recorded. Patients were asked about satisfaction (per eye), spectacle independence, near and intermediate activities, distance activities in quantity and quality, finally about personal facial care (per patient). Comparison was made between non-toric (48) and toric models, genders (18 males) and between bilateral (25 patients) and unilateral implantations. Results were correlated to age and IOL power.Results: With a SE of mean −0.3 ± 0.5 D, cases achieved mean VAsc 0.09 ± 0.1 (&sim;20/25), VAcc 0.05 ± 0.1 (&sim;20/22), IntVA 0.05 ± 0.9 (&sim;20/22), NVAsc 0.05 ± 0.09 (&sim;̴20/22) and NVAcc 0.04 ± 0.8 (̴&sim;20/22). Mean level of satisfaction was 85.7 ± 16.5, spectacle independence 96.0 ± 10.6, near activities 95.4 ± 9.8, intermediate activities 97.7 ± 6.4, quantity of distance activities 90.2 ± 10.1, quality of distance activities 88.0 ± 12.1 and facial care 92.6 ± 11.9. All comparisons (non-toric and toric, male and female and bilateral and unilateral implantation) were statistically insignificant (P>0.05). Correlation with age and IOL power was also statistically insignificant (P>0.05).Conclusion: As perceived by patients, trifocal IOL resulted in very high level of satisfaction. This satisfaction is reflected on diverse visual activities. This level is achieved regardless of gender, IOL model or even unilateral implantation. It is also achieved regardless the age of patients or preoperative eye status.Keywords: Panoptix, trifocal, toric, subjective
format	article
author	Hamdi IM
author_facet	Hamdi IM
author_sort	Hamdi IM
title	Subjective Perception Of Trifocal IOL Performance, Including Toric Models
title_short	Subjective Perception Of Trifocal IOL Performance, Including Toric Models
title_full	Subjective Perception Of Trifocal IOL Performance, Including Toric Models
title_fullStr	Subjective Perception Of Trifocal IOL Performance, Including Toric Models
title_full_unstemmed	Subjective Perception Of Trifocal IOL Performance, Including Toric Models
title_sort	subjective perception of trifocal iol performance, including toric models
publisher	Dove Medical Press
publishDate	2019
url	https://doaj.org/article/e1eedee1cfaf423ca9dacd9cbdbfe586
work_keys_str_mv	AT hamdiim subjectiveperceptionoftrifocaliolperformanceincludingtoricmodels
_version_	1718401462598369280

Subjective Perception Of Trifocal IOL Performance, Including Toric Models

Ejemplares similares