COMPETITION, MEANING, AND MONUMENTALIZATION IN GALLIA COMATA

Perhaps the most striking, and archaeologically speaking the most evident, change that occurred in Gallia Comata from the 1st century BCE to the end of the 2nd century CE was the incorporation of massive, monumental, Roman-style architecture. Many of these monuments still stand to this day, providi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: AARON W. IRVIN
Formato: article
Lenguaje:DE
EN
RU
SR
Publicado: Faculty of Philosophy Novi Sad, Department of History 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e221b735734e4b07998cfbb57ce30dc1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e221b735734e4b07998cfbb57ce30dc1
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e221b735734e4b07998cfbb57ce30dc12021-12-03T12:59:38ZCOMPETITION, MEANING, AND MONUMENTALIZATION IN GALLIA COMATA10.19090/i.2021.32.7-200350-21122406-1131https://doaj.org/article/e221b735734e4b07998cfbb57ce30dc12021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://istrazivanja.ff.uns.ac.rs/index.php/istr/article/view/2167https://doaj.org/toc/0350-2112https://doaj.org/toc/2406-1131 Perhaps the most striking, and archaeologically speaking the most evident, change that occurred in Gallia Comata from the 1st century BCE to the end of the 2nd century CE was the incorporation of massive, monumental, Roman-style architecture. Many of these monuments still stand to this day, providing an obvious, visual argument for the impact that Roman culture had on Gallic society. Overall, the incorporation of Roman architecture and monuments, paid for and dedicated by members of the local elite, seems to indicate a clear cultural shift in Gallic society and the adoption of Roman conceptions of urbanism and the role of the urban aristocracy in providing munera for the populace. This paper will examine the remains of monumental structures in the Gallic civitas-capitals, examining the initial stages of monumentalization. While early structures advertised the connection between the community as a whole with the Imperial power structure, the construction of amphitheaters in particular emerged rapidly throughout the Three Gauls and, as this paper will argue, was tied to the glorification and memorialization of the dedicator and his family. The edification of urban space thus became a new ground for the Gallic aristocracy to play out its internal rivalries, rather than a public expression of acceptance or obedience under Rome, and through the use of amphitheaters, urban edification allowed the Gallic aristocracy to retain their ties to the concept of competitive status and martial prowess. AARON W. IRVINFaculty of Philosophy Novi Sad, Department of History articleRomanization, Imperialism, Gaul, Gallo-Roman, Amphitheaters, Pre-Roman Gaul, Roman Monuments, Roman ProvincesHistory of Balkan PeninsulaDR1-2285DEENRUSRИстраживања, Iss 32 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language DE
EN
RU
SR
topic Romanization, Imperialism, Gaul, Gallo-Roman, Amphitheaters, Pre-Roman Gaul, Roman Monuments, Roman Provinces
History of Balkan Peninsula
DR1-2285
spellingShingle Romanization, Imperialism, Gaul, Gallo-Roman, Amphitheaters, Pre-Roman Gaul, Roman Monuments, Roman Provinces
History of Balkan Peninsula
DR1-2285
AARON W. IRVIN
COMPETITION, MEANING, AND MONUMENTALIZATION IN GALLIA COMATA
description Perhaps the most striking, and archaeologically speaking the most evident, change that occurred in Gallia Comata from the 1st century BCE to the end of the 2nd century CE was the incorporation of massive, monumental, Roman-style architecture. Many of these monuments still stand to this day, providing an obvious, visual argument for the impact that Roman culture had on Gallic society. Overall, the incorporation of Roman architecture and monuments, paid for and dedicated by members of the local elite, seems to indicate a clear cultural shift in Gallic society and the adoption of Roman conceptions of urbanism and the role of the urban aristocracy in providing munera for the populace. This paper will examine the remains of monumental structures in the Gallic civitas-capitals, examining the initial stages of monumentalization. While early structures advertised the connection between the community as a whole with the Imperial power structure, the construction of amphitheaters in particular emerged rapidly throughout the Three Gauls and, as this paper will argue, was tied to the glorification and memorialization of the dedicator and his family. The edification of urban space thus became a new ground for the Gallic aristocracy to play out its internal rivalries, rather than a public expression of acceptance or obedience under Rome, and through the use of amphitheaters, urban edification allowed the Gallic aristocracy to retain their ties to the concept of competitive status and martial prowess.
format article
author AARON W. IRVIN
author_facet AARON W. IRVIN
author_sort AARON W. IRVIN
title COMPETITION, MEANING, AND MONUMENTALIZATION IN GALLIA COMATA
title_short COMPETITION, MEANING, AND MONUMENTALIZATION IN GALLIA COMATA
title_full COMPETITION, MEANING, AND MONUMENTALIZATION IN GALLIA COMATA
title_fullStr COMPETITION, MEANING, AND MONUMENTALIZATION IN GALLIA COMATA
title_full_unstemmed COMPETITION, MEANING, AND MONUMENTALIZATION IN GALLIA COMATA
title_sort competition, meaning, and monumentalization in gallia comata
publisher Faculty of Philosophy Novi Sad, Department of History
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/e221b735734e4b07998cfbb57ce30dc1
work_keys_str_mv AT aaronwirvin competitionmeaningandmonumentalizationingalliacomata
_version_ 1718373237853782016