Biosecurity on cattle farms: a study in north-west England.

<h4>Background</h4>Few studies have considered in detail the range of biosecurity practices undertaken on cattle farms, particularly within the UK. In this study, 56 cattle farmers in a 100 km² area of north-west England were questioned regarding their on-farm biosecurity practices, incl...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marnie L Brennan, Robert M Christley
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e22220a37b844981968a421c45371d3b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e22220a37b844981968a421c45371d3b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e22220a37b844981968a421c45371d3b2021-11-18T07:31:12ZBiosecurity on cattle farms: a study in north-west England.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0028139https://doaj.org/article/e22220a37b844981968a421c45371d3b2012-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22235244/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>Few studies have considered in detail the range of biosecurity practices undertaken on cattle farms, particularly within the UK. In this study, 56 cattle farmers in a 100 km² area of north-west England were questioned regarding their on-farm biosecurity practices, including those relating to animal movements, equipment sharing and companies and contractors visiting the farms.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>There was great variation between farms in terms of the type of, and extent to which, biosecurity was carried out. For example, the majority of farmers did not isolate stock bought onto the farm, but a small proportion always isolated stock. Many farmers administered treatments post-movement, primarily vaccinations and anthelmintics, but very few farms reported carrying out any health checks after moving animals on. In addition, there appeared to be much variation in the amount of biosecurity carried out by the different companies and contractors visiting the farms. Deadstock collectors and contracted animal waste spreaders, although likely to have a high potential for contact with infectious agents, were reported to infrequently disinfect themselves and their vehicles.<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>These findings suggest that although certain biosecurity practices are undertaken, many are carried out infrequently or not at all. This may be due to many factors, including cost (in time and money), lack of proven efficacies of practices and lack of relevant education of veterinary surgeons, producers and other herd health specialists. Further research exploring the reasons for the lack of uptake is imperative if preventive medicine is to be utilised fully by the farming industry.Marnie L BrennanRobert M ChristleyPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 7, Iss 1, p e28139 (2012)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Marnie L Brennan
Robert M Christley
Biosecurity on cattle farms: a study in north-west England.
description <h4>Background</h4>Few studies have considered in detail the range of biosecurity practices undertaken on cattle farms, particularly within the UK. In this study, 56 cattle farmers in a 100 km² area of north-west England were questioned regarding their on-farm biosecurity practices, including those relating to animal movements, equipment sharing and companies and contractors visiting the farms.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>There was great variation between farms in terms of the type of, and extent to which, biosecurity was carried out. For example, the majority of farmers did not isolate stock bought onto the farm, but a small proportion always isolated stock. Many farmers administered treatments post-movement, primarily vaccinations and anthelmintics, but very few farms reported carrying out any health checks after moving animals on. In addition, there appeared to be much variation in the amount of biosecurity carried out by the different companies and contractors visiting the farms. Deadstock collectors and contracted animal waste spreaders, although likely to have a high potential for contact with infectious agents, were reported to infrequently disinfect themselves and their vehicles.<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>These findings suggest that although certain biosecurity practices are undertaken, many are carried out infrequently or not at all. This may be due to many factors, including cost (in time and money), lack of proven efficacies of practices and lack of relevant education of veterinary surgeons, producers and other herd health specialists. Further research exploring the reasons for the lack of uptake is imperative if preventive medicine is to be utilised fully by the farming industry.
format article
author Marnie L Brennan
Robert M Christley
author_facet Marnie L Brennan
Robert M Christley
author_sort Marnie L Brennan
title Biosecurity on cattle farms: a study in north-west England.
title_short Biosecurity on cattle farms: a study in north-west England.
title_full Biosecurity on cattle farms: a study in north-west England.
title_fullStr Biosecurity on cattle farms: a study in north-west England.
title_full_unstemmed Biosecurity on cattle farms: a study in north-west England.
title_sort biosecurity on cattle farms: a study in north-west england.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2012
url https://doaj.org/article/e22220a37b844981968a421c45371d3b
work_keys_str_mv AT marnielbrennan biosecurityoncattlefarmsastudyinnorthwestengland
AT robertmchristley biosecurityoncattlefarmsastudyinnorthwestengland
_version_ 1718423381952430080