3D Printing Optimization for Environmental Sustainability: Experimenting with Materials of Protective Face Shield Frames
The motivation for research on 3D printing of protective face shields was the urgent societal demand for healthcare in the fight against the spread of COVID19 pandemic. Research is based on a literature review that shows that objects produced by additive technologies do not always have consistent qu...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/e25f7b58893c4ba1906becca7c2f087e |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:e25f7b58893c4ba1906becca7c2f087e |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:e25f7b58893c4ba1906becca7c2f087e2021-11-11T18:08:03Z3D Printing Optimization for Environmental Sustainability: Experimenting with Materials of Protective Face Shield Frames10.3390/ma142165951996-1944https://doaj.org/article/e25f7b58893c4ba1906becca7c2f087e2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/21/6595https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1944The motivation for research on 3D printing of protective face shields was the urgent societal demand for healthcare in the fight against the spread of COVID19 pandemic. Research is based on a literature review that shows that objects produced by additive technologies do not always have consistent quality suitable for the given purpose of use. Besides, they have different effects on the environment and leave different footprints. The overall goal of the research was to find out the most suitable thermoplastic material for printing shield frames in terms of mechanical properties, geometric accuracy, weight, printing time, filament price, and environmental sustainability. Fused deposition modeling (FDM) technology was used for 3D printing, and three different filaments were investigated: polylactic acid (PLA), polyethylene terephthalate (PETG), and polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA). The weighted sum method for multi-objective optimization was used. Finally, PHA material was chosen, mainly due to its environmental sustainability, as it has the most negligible impact on the environment.Kristína ZgodavováKristína LengyelováPeter BoberJosé Alberto EgurenAmaia MorenoMDPI AGarticleDesign for Six Sigmafractional factorial designfused deposition modellingPLAPETGPHATechnologyTElectrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineeringTK1-9971Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040MicroscopyQH201-278.5Descriptive and experimental mechanicsQC120-168.85ENMaterials, Vol 14, Iss 6595, p 6595 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Design for Six Sigma fractional factorial design fused deposition modelling PLA PETG PHA Technology T Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering TK1-9971 Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Microscopy QH201-278.5 Descriptive and experimental mechanics QC120-168.85 |
spellingShingle |
Design for Six Sigma fractional factorial design fused deposition modelling PLA PETG PHA Technology T Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering TK1-9971 Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Microscopy QH201-278.5 Descriptive and experimental mechanics QC120-168.85 Kristína Zgodavová Kristína Lengyelová Peter Bober José Alberto Eguren Amaia Moreno 3D Printing Optimization for Environmental Sustainability: Experimenting with Materials of Protective Face Shield Frames |
description |
The motivation for research on 3D printing of protective face shields was the urgent societal demand for healthcare in the fight against the spread of COVID19 pandemic. Research is based on a literature review that shows that objects produced by additive technologies do not always have consistent quality suitable for the given purpose of use. Besides, they have different effects on the environment and leave different footprints. The overall goal of the research was to find out the most suitable thermoplastic material for printing shield frames in terms of mechanical properties, geometric accuracy, weight, printing time, filament price, and environmental sustainability. Fused deposition modeling (FDM) technology was used for 3D printing, and three different filaments were investigated: polylactic acid (PLA), polyethylene terephthalate (PETG), and polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA). The weighted sum method for multi-objective optimization was used. Finally, PHA material was chosen, mainly due to its environmental sustainability, as it has the most negligible impact on the environment. |
format |
article |
author |
Kristína Zgodavová Kristína Lengyelová Peter Bober José Alberto Eguren Amaia Moreno |
author_facet |
Kristína Zgodavová Kristína Lengyelová Peter Bober José Alberto Eguren Amaia Moreno |
author_sort |
Kristína Zgodavová |
title |
3D Printing Optimization for Environmental Sustainability: Experimenting with Materials of Protective Face Shield Frames |
title_short |
3D Printing Optimization for Environmental Sustainability: Experimenting with Materials of Protective Face Shield Frames |
title_full |
3D Printing Optimization for Environmental Sustainability: Experimenting with Materials of Protective Face Shield Frames |
title_fullStr |
3D Printing Optimization for Environmental Sustainability: Experimenting with Materials of Protective Face Shield Frames |
title_full_unstemmed |
3D Printing Optimization for Environmental Sustainability: Experimenting with Materials of Protective Face Shield Frames |
title_sort |
3d printing optimization for environmental sustainability: experimenting with materials of protective face shield frames |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/e25f7b58893c4ba1906becca7c2f087e |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kristinazgodavova 3dprintingoptimizationforenvironmentalsustainabilityexperimentingwithmaterialsofprotectivefaceshieldframes AT kristinalengyelova 3dprintingoptimizationforenvironmentalsustainabilityexperimentingwithmaterialsofprotectivefaceshieldframes AT peterbober 3dprintingoptimizationforenvironmentalsustainabilityexperimentingwithmaterialsofprotectivefaceshieldframes AT josealbertoeguren 3dprintingoptimizationforenvironmentalsustainabilityexperimentingwithmaterialsofprotectivefaceshieldframes AT amaiamoreno 3dprintingoptimizationforenvironmentalsustainabilityexperimentingwithmaterialsofprotectivefaceshieldframes |
_version_ |
1718431974061768704 |