Extending the forward systemic risk measure: Do sector level variables matter?

Systemic risk is of concern for economic welfare as systemic financial crisis has the potential to inefficiently lower the supply of credit to the nonfinancial sector. Conventional systemic risk measures are parsimonious in nature and are used to assess the current systemic risk contributions of fin...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasan Hanif, Muhammad Naveed, Mobeen Ur Rehman
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e28cce209c3c4862ba6cfcef109f2146
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e28cce209c3c4862ba6cfcef109f2146
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e28cce209c3c4862ba6cfcef109f21462021-12-02T17:01:05ZExtending the forward systemic risk measure: Do sector level variables matter?2331-197510.1080/23311975.2020.1809944https://doaj.org/article/e28cce209c3c4862ba6cfcef109f21462020-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1809944https://doaj.org/toc/2331-1975Systemic risk is of concern for economic welfare as systemic financial crisis has the potential to inefficiently lower the supply of credit to the nonfinancial sector. Conventional systemic risk measures are parsimonious in nature and are used to assess the current systemic risk contributions of financial institutions and does not highlight future systemic risk. In order to overcome the limitations of conventional systemic risk, $$\Delta {\rm{CoVa}}{{\rm{R}}^\$ }$$ is used predict future systemic risk and the literature outlines the use of firm and state level variables in the computation. This study contributes to the existing body of knowledge by providing empirical evidence on improved computation of forward systemic risk by corroborating the distinctive impact of sector’s nature: munificence, dynamism and level of concentration. The comparison of conventional and proposed forward CoVaR provides interesting insights into the role of sector level variables in the buildup of systemic risk. The results highlight that the forecasting ability of forward ∆CoVaR predicted with sector level variables is reasonably higher than that of predicted without sector level variables. The study provides guidelines to the policy makers by providing an improved measure of future systemic risk that can that can help to avoid procycality pitfall by introducing countercyclical policies before the happening of systemic event. The results present new insights on the drivers of financial instability and provide implications for the micro- and macroprudential regulations of the banks.Hasan HanifMuhammad NaveedMobeen Ur RehmanTaylor & Francis Grouparticle∆covarforward ∆covarmunificencedynamismconcentrationBusinessHF5001-6182Management. Industrial managementHD28-70ENCogent Business & Management, Vol 7, Iss 1 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic ∆covar
forward ∆covar
munificence
dynamism
concentration
Business
HF5001-6182
Management. Industrial management
HD28-70
spellingShingle ∆covar
forward ∆covar
munificence
dynamism
concentration
Business
HF5001-6182
Management. Industrial management
HD28-70
Hasan Hanif
Muhammad Naveed
Mobeen Ur Rehman
Extending the forward systemic risk measure: Do sector level variables matter?
description Systemic risk is of concern for economic welfare as systemic financial crisis has the potential to inefficiently lower the supply of credit to the nonfinancial sector. Conventional systemic risk measures are parsimonious in nature and are used to assess the current systemic risk contributions of financial institutions and does not highlight future systemic risk. In order to overcome the limitations of conventional systemic risk, $$\Delta {\rm{CoVa}}{{\rm{R}}^\$ }$$ is used predict future systemic risk and the literature outlines the use of firm and state level variables in the computation. This study contributes to the existing body of knowledge by providing empirical evidence on improved computation of forward systemic risk by corroborating the distinctive impact of sector’s nature: munificence, dynamism and level of concentration. The comparison of conventional and proposed forward CoVaR provides interesting insights into the role of sector level variables in the buildup of systemic risk. The results highlight that the forecasting ability of forward ∆CoVaR predicted with sector level variables is reasonably higher than that of predicted without sector level variables. The study provides guidelines to the policy makers by providing an improved measure of future systemic risk that can that can help to avoid procycality pitfall by introducing countercyclical policies before the happening of systemic event. The results present new insights on the drivers of financial instability and provide implications for the micro- and macroprudential regulations of the banks.
format article
author Hasan Hanif
Muhammad Naveed
Mobeen Ur Rehman
author_facet Hasan Hanif
Muhammad Naveed
Mobeen Ur Rehman
author_sort Hasan Hanif
title Extending the forward systemic risk measure: Do sector level variables matter?
title_short Extending the forward systemic risk measure: Do sector level variables matter?
title_full Extending the forward systemic risk measure: Do sector level variables matter?
title_fullStr Extending the forward systemic risk measure: Do sector level variables matter?
title_full_unstemmed Extending the forward systemic risk measure: Do sector level variables matter?
title_sort extending the forward systemic risk measure: do sector level variables matter?
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/e28cce209c3c4862ba6cfcef109f2146
work_keys_str_mv AT hasanhanif extendingtheforwardsystemicriskmeasuredosectorlevelvariablesmatter
AT muhammadnaveed extendingtheforwardsystemicriskmeasuredosectorlevelvariablesmatter
AT mobeenurrehman extendingtheforwardsystemicriskmeasuredosectorlevelvariablesmatter
_version_ 1718382243835019264