Defending Hermeneutics
This article offers several perspectives on the challenges of defending Gadamerian hermeneutics in applied research settings, specifically counselling psychology and nursing. Given the lack of methodological steps associated with the method, researchers employing hermeneutics can be vulnerable to s...
Enregistré dans:
Auteurs principaux: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Langue: | EN |
Publié: |
University of Calgary
2018
|
Sujets: | |
Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/e2b31caadf9f430399bb1a27f83ae12a |
Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:e2b31caadf9f430399bb1a27f83ae12a |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:e2b31caadf9f430399bb1a27f83ae12a2021-11-25T21:23:58ZDefending Hermeneutics10.11575/jah.v0i0.568731927-4416https://doaj.org/article/e2b31caadf9f430399bb1a27f83ae12a2018-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/jah/article/view/56873https://doaj.org/toc/1927-4416 This article offers several perspectives on the challenges of defending Gadamerian hermeneutics in applied research settings, specifically counselling psychology and nursing. Given the lack of methodological steps associated with the method, researchers employing hermeneutics can be vulnerable to scrutiny from others. We discuss the uncertainty that is inevitable when embarking on hermeneutic inquiry and provide personal accounts of how we have encountered the uncertain nature of hermeneutics. Emily P WilliamsCatherine M LaingIsabel BrunUniversity of Calgaryarticlehermeneuticsqualitative researchcounselling psychologynursingPhilosophy (General)B1-5802ENJournal of Applied Hermeneutics (2018) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
hermeneutics qualitative research counselling psychology nursing Philosophy (General) B1-5802 |
spellingShingle |
hermeneutics qualitative research counselling psychology nursing Philosophy (General) B1-5802 Emily P Williams Catherine M Laing Isabel Brun Defending Hermeneutics |
description |
This article offers several perspectives on the challenges of defending Gadamerian hermeneutics in applied research settings, specifically counselling psychology and nursing. Given the lack of methodological steps associated with the method, researchers employing hermeneutics can be vulnerable to scrutiny from others. We discuss the uncertainty that is inevitable when embarking on hermeneutic inquiry and provide personal accounts of how we have encountered the uncertain nature of hermeneutics.
|
format |
article |
author |
Emily P Williams Catherine M Laing Isabel Brun |
author_facet |
Emily P Williams Catherine M Laing Isabel Brun |
author_sort |
Emily P Williams |
title |
Defending Hermeneutics |
title_short |
Defending Hermeneutics |
title_full |
Defending Hermeneutics |
title_fullStr |
Defending Hermeneutics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Defending Hermeneutics |
title_sort |
defending hermeneutics |
publisher |
University of Calgary |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/e2b31caadf9f430399bb1a27f83ae12a |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT emilypwilliams defendinghermeneutics AT catherinemlaing defendinghermeneutics AT isabelbrun defendinghermeneutics |
_version_ |
1718410063900573696 |