The Nenets Autonomous Okrug in the system of Russian federalism: an ethno-sociological investigation

The article is devoted to the analysis of trends in the development of modern Russian federalism, against the background the discussions about a possible merger of the Nenets Autonomous Okrug (NAO) and the Arkhangelsk Region. These discussions caused mass protests among the residents of the Nenets A...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vladimir Yu. Zorin, Mikhail S. Kamenskikh
Formato: article
Lenguaje:RU
Publicado: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e2d95881e53a406bbdfe4b60ac830a13
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e2d95881e53a406bbdfe4b60ac830a13
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e2d95881e53a406bbdfe4b60ac830a132021-12-02T09:52:21ZThe Nenets Autonomous Okrug in the system of Russian federalism: an ethno-sociological investigation2312-86742312-869010.22363/2312-8674-2021-20-4-568-578https://doaj.org/article/e2d95881e53a406bbdfe4b60ac830a132021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.rudn.ru/russian-history/article/viewFile/29573/20054https://doaj.org/toc/2312-8674https://doaj.org/toc/2312-8690The article is devoted to the analysis of trends in the development of modern Russian federalism, against the background the discussions about a possible merger of the Nenets Autonomous Okrug (NAO) and the Arkhangelsk Region. These discussions caused mass protests among the residents of the Nenets Autonomous Okrug. In 1993, the NAO was proclaimed as an equal subject of the Russian Federation. However, the Okrugs historical dependence on the Arkhangelsk Region in terms of transport and energy caused difficult relations between the two regions over the past 30 years. In this regard, the situation in the Okrug is of interest from the standpoint of analyzing trends in the development of Russian federalism. In 2020, the situation around the NAO and the Arkhangelsk Region came back on the agenda after the announcement of the upcoming merger of the subjects. Mass protests, and the refusal of the majority of the district's population to support the amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, suspended the process of regional integration. The main source of the study are data won from an ethno-sociological study conducted in the district in 2020. The study included questionnaires, focus groups and in-depth interview recordings. The material shows that despite the decision, the population of the district and public opinion leaders find an integration of the district and the Arkhangelsk region into one subject inacceptable. Moreover, the idea is perceived by many people as a threat, an attempt to conquer, invade. The participants of the survey give a negative assessment of the actions of the Arkhangelsk region authorities and support representatives of the district authorities that are against the integration. At the same time, the residents of the Okrug share the values of civil Russian identity and are ready to dialogue and compromises. The authors suppose that now it is essential to develop a flexible strategy and take into consideration the situation that has emerged recently. In the short term, it is necessary to involve broad strata of public opinion leaders in discussion and cooperation, study their sentiments, and take their position into account when studying the feasibility of new regions. It is necessary to involve the expert community in the development of the strategy.Vladimir Yu. ZorinMikhail S. KamenskikhPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)articlenational policynenetsnational districtsadministrative reformnational territorial structureHistory of Russia. Soviet Union. Former Soviet RepublicsDK1-4735RURUDN Journal of Russian History, Vol 20, Iss 4, Pp 568-578 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language RU
topic national policy
nenets
national districts
administrative reform
national territorial structure
History of Russia. Soviet Union. Former Soviet Republics
DK1-4735
spellingShingle national policy
nenets
national districts
administrative reform
national territorial structure
History of Russia. Soviet Union. Former Soviet Republics
DK1-4735
Vladimir Yu. Zorin
Mikhail S. Kamenskikh
The Nenets Autonomous Okrug in the system of Russian federalism: an ethno-sociological investigation
description The article is devoted to the analysis of trends in the development of modern Russian federalism, against the background the discussions about a possible merger of the Nenets Autonomous Okrug (NAO) and the Arkhangelsk Region. These discussions caused mass protests among the residents of the Nenets Autonomous Okrug. In 1993, the NAO was proclaimed as an equal subject of the Russian Federation. However, the Okrugs historical dependence on the Arkhangelsk Region in terms of transport and energy caused difficult relations between the two regions over the past 30 years. In this regard, the situation in the Okrug is of interest from the standpoint of analyzing trends in the development of Russian federalism. In 2020, the situation around the NAO and the Arkhangelsk Region came back on the agenda after the announcement of the upcoming merger of the subjects. Mass protests, and the refusal of the majority of the district's population to support the amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, suspended the process of regional integration. The main source of the study are data won from an ethno-sociological study conducted in the district in 2020. The study included questionnaires, focus groups and in-depth interview recordings. The material shows that despite the decision, the population of the district and public opinion leaders find an integration of the district and the Arkhangelsk region into one subject inacceptable. Moreover, the idea is perceived by many people as a threat, an attempt to conquer, invade. The participants of the survey give a negative assessment of the actions of the Arkhangelsk region authorities and support representatives of the district authorities that are against the integration. At the same time, the residents of the Okrug share the values of civil Russian identity and are ready to dialogue and compromises. The authors suppose that now it is essential to develop a flexible strategy and take into consideration the situation that has emerged recently. In the short term, it is necessary to involve broad strata of public opinion leaders in discussion and cooperation, study their sentiments, and take their position into account when studying the feasibility of new regions. It is necessary to involve the expert community in the development of the strategy.
format article
author Vladimir Yu. Zorin
Mikhail S. Kamenskikh
author_facet Vladimir Yu. Zorin
Mikhail S. Kamenskikh
author_sort Vladimir Yu. Zorin
title The Nenets Autonomous Okrug in the system of Russian federalism: an ethno-sociological investigation
title_short The Nenets Autonomous Okrug in the system of Russian federalism: an ethno-sociological investigation
title_full The Nenets Autonomous Okrug in the system of Russian federalism: an ethno-sociological investigation
title_fullStr The Nenets Autonomous Okrug in the system of Russian federalism: an ethno-sociological investigation
title_full_unstemmed The Nenets Autonomous Okrug in the system of Russian federalism: an ethno-sociological investigation
title_sort nenets autonomous okrug in the system of russian federalism: an ethno-sociological investigation
publisher Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/e2d95881e53a406bbdfe4b60ac830a13
work_keys_str_mv AT vladimiryuzorin thenenetsautonomousokruginthesystemofrussianfederalismanethnosociologicalinvestigation
AT mikhailskamenskikh thenenetsautonomousokruginthesystemofrussianfederalismanethnosociologicalinvestigation
AT vladimiryuzorin nenetsautonomousokruginthesystemofrussianfederalismanethnosociologicalinvestigation
AT mikhailskamenskikh nenetsautonomousokruginthesystemofrussianfederalismanethnosociologicalinvestigation
_version_ 1718397976799346688