Endocytic uptake of monomeric amyloid-β peptides is clathrin- and dynamin-independent and results in selective accumulation of Aβ(1–42) compared to Aβ(1–40)

Abstract Intraneuronal accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides represent an early pathological feature in Alzheimer’s disease. We have therefore utilized flow cytometry and confocal microscopy in combination with endocytosis inhibition to explore the internalisation efficiency and uptake mechanisms...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Emelie Wesén, Gavin D. M. Jeffries, Maria Matson Dzebo, Elin K. Esbjörner
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/e34dbcaafc034c5c8abcd94164b12032
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:e34dbcaafc034c5c8abcd94164b12032
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:e34dbcaafc034c5c8abcd94164b120322021-12-02T12:30:25ZEndocytic uptake of monomeric amyloid-β peptides is clathrin- and dynamin-independent and results in selective accumulation of Aβ(1–42) compared to Aβ(1–40)10.1038/s41598-017-02227-92045-2322https://doaj.org/article/e34dbcaafc034c5c8abcd94164b120322017-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02227-9https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Intraneuronal accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides represent an early pathological feature in Alzheimer’s disease. We have therefore utilized flow cytometry and confocal microscopy in combination with endocytosis inhibition to explore the internalisation efficiency and uptake mechanisms of Aβ(1–40) and Aβ(1–42) monomers in cultured SH-SY5Y cells. We find that both variants are constitutively internalised via endocytosis and that their uptake is proportional to cellular endocytic rate. Moreover, SH-SY5Y cells internalise consistently twice the amount of Aβ(1–42) compared to Aβ(1–40); an imaging-based quantification showed that cells treated with 1 µM peptide for 8 h contained 800,000 peptides of Aβ(1–42) and 400,000 of Aβ(1–40). Both variants co-localised to >90% with lysosomes or other acidic compartments. Dynasore and chlorpromazine endocytosis inhibitors were both found to reduce uptake, particularly of Aβ(1–42). Overexpression of the C-terminal of the clathrin-binding domain of AP180, dynamin2 K44A, or Arf6 Q67L did however not reduce uptake of the Aβ variants. By contrast, perturbation of actin polymerisation and inhibition of macropinocytosis reduced Aβ(1–40) and Aβ(1–42) uptake considerably. This study clarifies mechanisms of Aβ(1–40) and Aβ(1–42) uptake, pinpoints differences between the two variants and highlights a common and putative role of macropinocytosis in the early accumulation of intraneuronal Aβ in AD.Emelie WesénGavin D. M. JeffriesMaria Matson DzeboElin K. EsbjörnerNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-14 (2017)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Emelie Wesén Gavin D. M. Jeffries Maria Matson Dzebo Elin K. Esbjörner Endocytic uptake of monomeric amyloid-β peptides is clathrin- and dynamin-independent and results in selective accumulation of Aβ(1–42) compared to Aβ(1–40)
description	Abstract Intraneuronal accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides represent an early pathological feature in Alzheimer’s disease. We have therefore utilized flow cytometry and confocal microscopy in combination with endocytosis inhibition to explore the internalisation efficiency and uptake mechanisms of Aβ(1–40) and Aβ(1–42) monomers in cultured SH-SY5Y cells. We find that both variants are constitutively internalised via endocytosis and that their uptake is proportional to cellular endocytic rate. Moreover, SH-SY5Y cells internalise consistently twice the amount of Aβ(1–42) compared to Aβ(1–40); an imaging-based quantification showed that cells treated with 1 µM peptide for 8 h contained 800,000 peptides of Aβ(1–42) and 400,000 of Aβ(1–40). Both variants co-localised to >90% with lysosomes or other acidic compartments. Dynasore and chlorpromazine endocytosis inhibitors were both found to reduce uptake, particularly of Aβ(1–42). Overexpression of the C-terminal of the clathrin-binding domain of AP180, dynamin2 K44A, or Arf6 Q67L did however not reduce uptake of the Aβ variants. By contrast, perturbation of actin polymerisation and inhibition of macropinocytosis reduced Aβ(1–40) and Aβ(1–42) uptake considerably. This study clarifies mechanisms of Aβ(1–40) and Aβ(1–42) uptake, pinpoints differences between the two variants and highlights a common and putative role of macropinocytosis in the early accumulation of intraneuronal Aβ in AD.
format	article
author	Emelie Wesén Gavin D. M. Jeffries Maria Matson Dzebo Elin K. Esbjörner
author_facet	Emelie Wesén Gavin D. M. Jeffries Maria Matson Dzebo Elin K. Esbjörner
author_sort	Emelie Wesén
title	Endocytic uptake of monomeric amyloid-β peptides is clathrin- and dynamin-independent and results in selective accumulation of Aβ(1–42) compared to Aβ(1–40)
title_short	Endocytic uptake of monomeric amyloid-β peptides is clathrin- and dynamin-independent and results in selective accumulation of Aβ(1–42) compared to Aβ(1–40)
title_full	Endocytic uptake of monomeric amyloid-β peptides is clathrin- and dynamin-independent and results in selective accumulation of Aβ(1–42) compared to Aβ(1–40)
title_fullStr	Endocytic uptake of monomeric amyloid-β peptides is clathrin- and dynamin-independent and results in selective accumulation of Aβ(1–42) compared to Aβ(1–40)
title_full_unstemmed	Endocytic uptake of monomeric amyloid-β peptides is clathrin- and dynamin-independent and results in selective accumulation of Aβ(1–42) compared to Aβ(1–40)
title_sort	endocytic uptake of monomeric amyloid-β peptides is clathrin- and dynamin-independent and results in selective accumulation of aβ(1–42) compared to aβ(1–40)
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2017
url	https://doaj.org/article/e34dbcaafc034c5c8abcd94164b12032
work_keys_str_mv	AT emeliewesen endocyticuptakeofmonomericamyloidbpeptidesisclathrinanddynaminindependentandresultsinselectiveaccumulationofab142comparedtoab140 AT gavindmjeffries endocyticuptakeofmonomericamyloidbpeptidesisclathrinanddynaminindependentandresultsinselectiveaccumulationofab142comparedtoab140 AT mariamatsondzebo endocyticuptakeofmonomericamyloidbpeptidesisclathrinanddynaminindependentandresultsinselectiveaccumulationofab142comparedtoab140 AT elinkesbjorner endocyticuptakeofmonomericamyloidbpeptidesisclathrinanddynaminindependentandresultsinselectiveaccumulationofab142comparedtoab140
_version_	1718394429169991680

Endocytic uptake of monomeric amyloid-β peptides is clathrin- and dynamin-independent and results in selective accumulation of Aβ(1–42) compared to Aβ(1–40)

Ejemplares similares