Comparison of the Visual Outcomes of an Extended Depth-of-Focus Lens and a Trifocal Lens

Majid Moshirfar,1– 3 James Ellis,4 Daniel Beesley,5 Shannon E McCabe,1,6 Adam Lewis,7 William B West Jnr,4 Yasmyne Ronquillo,1 Phillip Hoopes Snr1 1Hoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT, USA; 2John A. Moran Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Moshirfar M, Ellis J, Beesley D, McCabe SE, Lewis A, West Jnr WB, Ronquillo Y, Hoopes Snr P
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Dove Medical Press 2021
Materias:	visual acuity intraocular lens trifocal lens extended depth-of-focus lens Ophthalmology RE1-994
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/e3860fdf36e748369e7b60b9ceca2bf8
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:e3860fdf36e748369e7b60b9ceca2bf8
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:e3860fdf36e748369e7b60b9ceca2bf82021-12-02T18:26:44ZComparison of the Visual Outcomes of an Extended Depth-of-Focus Lens and a Trifocal Lens1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/e3860fdf36e748369e7b60b9ceca2bf82021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-the-visual-outcomes-of-an-extended-depth-of-focus-lens-a-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Majid Moshirfar,1– 3 James Ellis,4 Daniel Beesley,5 Shannon E McCabe,1,6 Adam Lewis,7 William B West Jnr,4 Yasmyne Ronquillo,1 Phillip Hoopes Snr1 1Hoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT, USA; 2John A. Moran Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; 3Utah Lions Eye Bank, Murray, UT, USA; 4University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; 5Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA; 6Mission Hills Eye Center, Pleasant Hill, CA, USA; 7Kansas City University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USACorrespondence: Majid MoshirfarHoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT, USATel +1 801-568-0200Fax +1 801-563-0200Email cornea2020@me.comPurpose: To compare the visual performance of the AcrySof IQ PanOptix trifocal intraocular lens and the TECNIS Symfony extended depth-of-focus lens at near and distance visual ranges.Methods: A total of 146 patients (221 eyes) who underwent phacoemulsification and cataract extraction and received either a PanOptix or Symfony lens from January 2019 to July 2020 were included in the study (83 PanOptix non-toric, 30 PanOptix toric, 70 Symfony non-toric, and 38 Symfony toric). Uncorrected distance (UDVA), uncorrected near (UNVA), and corrected distance (CDVA) visual acuity were assessed at one-day, one-month, and three-months postoperatively. Averages of UDVA, UNVA, and CDVA were taken to evaluate which lens was superior at near and distance visual ranges. Secondary outcome measures including glare, halo, dryness, and problems with night vision were documented at each postoperative visit.Results: At one month postoperatively, the average UNVA was 0.16 ± 0.14 logMAR in the PanOptix group and 0.21 ± 0.14 logMAR in the Symfony group (P=0.007); the average UDVA for the PanOptix group was 0.09 ± 0.13 logMAR compared to the Symfony group at 0.10 ± 0.14 logMAR (P=0.67); and the average CDVA was 0.02 ± 0.05 logMAR in the PanOptix group and 0.00 ± 0.04 logMAR in the Symfony group (P=0.11). At three months postoperatively, there were no statistically significant differences in UNVA, UDVA, or CDVA between the two groups (P=0.18, 0.79, 0.68 respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in secondary outcome measures at one- and three-months (P=0.49, 0.10 respectively).Conclusion: The AcrySof IQ PanOptix trifocal intraocular lens appears to afford better UNVA compared to the TECNIS Symfony extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens at one-month postoperatively, though this difference was not seen at three months postoperatively. There is no statistically significant difference in UDVA and CDVA between the two groups at postoperative day one, one-month, and three-months.Keywords: visual acuity, intraocular lens, trifocal lens, extended depth-of-focus lensMoshirfar MEllis JBeesley DMcCabe SELewis AWest Jnr WBRonquillo YHoopes Snr PDove Medical Pressarticlevisual acuityintraocular lenstrifocal lensextended depth-of-focus lensOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 15, Pp 3051-3063 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	visual acuity intraocular lens trifocal lens extended depth-of-focus lens Ophthalmology RE1-994
spellingShingle	visual acuity intraocular lens trifocal lens extended depth-of-focus lens Ophthalmology RE1-994 Moshirfar M Ellis J Beesley D McCabe SE Lewis A West Jnr WB Ronquillo Y Hoopes Snr P Comparison of the Visual Outcomes of an Extended Depth-of-Focus Lens and a Trifocal Lens
description	Majid Moshirfar,1– 3 James Ellis,4 Daniel Beesley,5 Shannon E McCabe,1,6 Adam Lewis,7 William B West Jnr,4 Yasmyne Ronquillo,1 Phillip Hoopes Snr1 1Hoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT, USA; 2John A. Moran Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; 3Utah Lions Eye Bank, Murray, UT, USA; 4University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; 5Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA; 6Mission Hills Eye Center, Pleasant Hill, CA, USA; 7Kansas City University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USACorrespondence: Majid MoshirfarHoopes Vision Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT, USATel +1 801-568-0200Fax +1 801-563-0200Email cornea2020@me.comPurpose: To compare the visual performance of the AcrySof IQ PanOptix trifocal intraocular lens and the TECNIS Symfony extended depth-of-focus lens at near and distance visual ranges.Methods: A total of 146 patients (221 eyes) who underwent phacoemulsification and cataract extraction and received either a PanOptix or Symfony lens from January 2019 to July 2020 were included in the study (83 PanOptix non-toric, 30 PanOptix toric, 70 Symfony non-toric, and 38 Symfony toric). Uncorrected distance (UDVA), uncorrected near (UNVA), and corrected distance (CDVA) visual acuity were assessed at one-day, one-month, and three-months postoperatively. Averages of UDVA, UNVA, and CDVA were taken to evaluate which lens was superior at near and distance visual ranges. Secondary outcome measures including glare, halo, dryness, and problems with night vision were documented at each postoperative visit.Results: At one month postoperatively, the average UNVA was 0.16 ± 0.14 logMAR in the PanOptix group and 0.21 ± 0.14 logMAR in the Symfony group (P=0.007); the average UDVA for the PanOptix group was 0.09 ± 0.13 logMAR compared to the Symfony group at 0.10 ± 0.14 logMAR (P=0.67); and the average CDVA was 0.02 ± 0.05 logMAR in the PanOptix group and 0.00 ± 0.04 logMAR in the Symfony group (P=0.11). At three months postoperatively, there were no statistically significant differences in UNVA, UDVA, or CDVA between the two groups (P=0.18, 0.79, 0.68 respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in secondary outcome measures at one- and three-months (P=0.49, 0.10 respectively).Conclusion: The AcrySof IQ PanOptix trifocal intraocular lens appears to afford better UNVA compared to the TECNIS Symfony extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens at one-month postoperatively, though this difference was not seen at three months postoperatively. There is no statistically significant difference in UDVA and CDVA between the two groups at postoperative day one, one-month, and three-months.Keywords: visual acuity, intraocular lens, trifocal lens, extended depth-of-focus lens
format	article
author	Moshirfar M Ellis J Beesley D McCabe SE Lewis A West Jnr WB Ronquillo Y Hoopes Snr P
author_facet	Moshirfar M Ellis J Beesley D McCabe SE Lewis A West Jnr WB Ronquillo Y Hoopes Snr P
author_sort	Moshirfar M
title	Comparison of the Visual Outcomes of an Extended Depth-of-Focus Lens and a Trifocal Lens
title_short	Comparison of the Visual Outcomes of an Extended Depth-of-Focus Lens and a Trifocal Lens
title_full	Comparison of the Visual Outcomes of an Extended Depth-of-Focus Lens and a Trifocal Lens
title_fullStr	Comparison of the Visual Outcomes of an Extended Depth-of-Focus Lens and a Trifocal Lens
title_full_unstemmed	Comparison of the Visual Outcomes of an Extended Depth-of-Focus Lens and a Trifocal Lens
title_sort	comparison of the visual outcomes of an extended depth-of-focus lens and a trifocal lens
publisher	Dove Medical Press
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/e3860fdf36e748369e7b60b9ceca2bf8
work_keys_str_mv	AT moshirfarm comparisonofthevisualoutcomesofanextendeddepthoffocuslensandatrifocallens AT ellisj comparisonofthevisualoutcomesofanextendeddepthoffocuslensandatrifocallens AT beesleyd comparisonofthevisualoutcomesofanextendeddepthoffocuslensandatrifocallens AT mccabese comparisonofthevisualoutcomesofanextendeddepthoffocuslensandatrifocallens AT lewisa comparisonofthevisualoutcomesofanextendeddepthoffocuslensandatrifocallens AT westjnrwb comparisonofthevisualoutcomesofanextendeddepthoffocuslensandatrifocallens AT ronquilloy comparisonofthevisualoutcomesofanextendeddepthoffocuslensandatrifocallens AT hoopessnrp comparisonofthevisualoutcomesofanextendeddepthoffocuslensandatrifocallens
_version_	1718378069568258048

Comparison of the Visual Outcomes of an Extended Depth-of-Focus Lens and a Trifocal Lens

Ejemplares similares