No differences in central corneal thickness between open-angle and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma patients

Marcelo Ayala,1 Johanna Karlsson2 1Eye Department, Skaraborg Hospital, Skövde, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University and Karolinska Institute, 2Faculty of Medicine, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden Introduction: Measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP) with Goldm...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ayala M, Karlsson J
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e393de3659414784b12024d1c1a9c246
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e393de3659414784b12024d1c1a9c246
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e393de3659414784b12024d1c1a9c2462021-12-02T01:10:49ZNo differences in central corneal thickness between open-angle and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma patients1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/e393de3659414784b12024d1c1a9c2462017-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/no-differences-in-central-corneal-thickness-between-open-angle-and-pse-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Marcelo Ayala,1 Johanna Karlsson2 1Eye Department, Skaraborg Hospital, Skövde, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University and Karolinska Institute, 2Faculty of Medicine, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden Introduction: Measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP) with Goldmann applanation tonometry are affected by central corneal thickness (CCT), as thinner corneas underestimate and thicker corneas overestimate the true IOP value. The literature is controversial regarding CCT values in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and exfoliation glaucoma (XFG). The aim of this study was to evaluate CCT in patients with XFG and POAG.Methods: CCT was evaluated with optical coherence tomography (OCT). All participants who were previously diagnosed with either POAG or XFG underwent ophthalmological examinations. Contact lens users and patients with corneal diseases were excluded.Results: Totally, 145 patients were enrolled in this study. The mean CCT was 535±30.4 µm in patients with POAG and was 536±33.7 µm in patients with XFG. The result was not statistically significant (P=0.98). The mean age for all participants was 73.8±7.7 years. The study included totally 61 women and 84 men. The two groups were similar in their demographic data, and mean deviation was the only parameter that differed statistically when comparing POAG with XFG (P=0.02).Conclusion: Our data indicate that patients with XFG do not have thinner corneas than those with POAG, and therefore, CCT can not explain why they progress differently. Keywords: primary open-angle glaucoma, exfoliative glaucoma, central corneal thickness, optical coherence tomographyAyala MKarlsson JDove Medical Pressarticleprimary open-angle glaucomaexfoliative glaucomacentral corneal thicknessoptical coherence tomographyOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 11, Pp 733-738 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic primary open-angle glaucoma
exfoliative glaucoma
central corneal thickness
optical coherence tomography
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle primary open-angle glaucoma
exfoliative glaucoma
central corneal thickness
optical coherence tomography
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Ayala M
Karlsson J
No differences in central corneal thickness between open-angle and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma patients
description Marcelo Ayala,1 Johanna Karlsson2 1Eye Department, Skaraborg Hospital, Skövde, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University and Karolinska Institute, 2Faculty of Medicine, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden Introduction: Measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP) with Goldmann applanation tonometry are affected by central corneal thickness (CCT), as thinner corneas underestimate and thicker corneas overestimate the true IOP value. The literature is controversial regarding CCT values in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and exfoliation glaucoma (XFG). The aim of this study was to evaluate CCT in patients with XFG and POAG.Methods: CCT was evaluated with optical coherence tomography (OCT). All participants who were previously diagnosed with either POAG or XFG underwent ophthalmological examinations. Contact lens users and patients with corneal diseases were excluded.Results: Totally, 145 patients were enrolled in this study. The mean CCT was 535±30.4 µm in patients with POAG and was 536±33.7 µm in patients with XFG. The result was not statistically significant (P=0.98). The mean age for all participants was 73.8±7.7 years. The study included totally 61 women and 84 men. The two groups were similar in their demographic data, and mean deviation was the only parameter that differed statistically when comparing POAG with XFG (P=0.02).Conclusion: Our data indicate that patients with XFG do not have thinner corneas than those with POAG, and therefore, CCT can not explain why they progress differently. Keywords: primary open-angle glaucoma, exfoliative glaucoma, central corneal thickness, optical coherence tomography
format article
author Ayala M
Karlsson J
author_facet Ayala M
Karlsson J
author_sort Ayala M
title No differences in central corneal thickness between open-angle and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma patients
title_short No differences in central corneal thickness between open-angle and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma patients
title_full No differences in central corneal thickness between open-angle and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma patients
title_fullStr No differences in central corneal thickness between open-angle and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma patients
title_full_unstemmed No differences in central corneal thickness between open-angle and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma patients
title_sort no differences in central corneal thickness between open-angle and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma patients
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/e393de3659414784b12024d1c1a9c246
work_keys_str_mv AT ayalam nodifferencesincentralcornealthicknessbetweenopenangleandpseudoexfoliationglaucomapatients
AT karlssonj nodifferencesincentralcornealthicknessbetweenopenangleandpseudoexfoliationglaucomapatients
_version_ 1718403287003168768