Computed Tomography Image Based on Intelligent Segmentation Algorithm in the Diagnosis of Ovarian Tumor
This study was to explore the application of computed tomography (CT) images based on intelligent segmentation algorithms in the analysis of ovarian tumors, so as to provide a theoretical basis for clinical diagnosis of ovarian tumors. In this study, 100 patients with ovarian tumors were selected as...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Hindawi Limited
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/e3a87f86390b41fe9d90c9c4490803c6 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | This study was to explore the application of computed tomography (CT) images based on intelligent segmentation algorithms in the analysis of ovarian tumors, so as to provide a theoretical basis for clinical diagnosis of ovarian tumors. In this study, 100 patients with ovarian tumors were selected as the research objects and performed CT imaging examinations; a convolutional neural networks (CNN) algorithm model was constructed and applied to CT diagnostic image segmentation of patients with ovarian tumors, so as to analyze the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm for CT image segmentation. As a result, the image was segmented three times under the CNN algorithm, and the numbers of true positives (TP) were 50, 49, and 50, respectively; the numbers of false positives (FP) were 1, 2, and 1, respectively; the numbers of false negatives (FN) were 2, 3, and 2, respectively; and the numbers of true negatives (TN) were 47, 46, and 47, respectively. Thus, there was no great difference in the three measured values P≥0.05. The accuracy of the CNN algorithm was 0.97, 0.95, and 0.97, respectively, for the three times of segmentation; the precision was 0.98, 0.96, and 0.98, respectively; the recall was 0.96, 0.94, and 0.96, respectively. Thus, the accuracy, precision, and recall of the three measurements were not greatly different P≥0.05. In addition, the F1 values of three measurements were 0.97, 0.94, and 0.97, respectively, which all were close to 1, showing no statistically great difference P≥0.05. The segmentation accuracy, precision, and recall of the algorithm in this study were greatly greater than the SE-Res Block U-shaped CNN algorithm, and the density peak clustering algorithm, and the differences were statistically significant P<0.05. In short, the CNN algorithm showed high accuracy, precision, recall, and comprehensive evaluation values for CT image segmentation, which made the diagnosis of malignant or benign ovarian tumors more effective and provided reliable theoretical guidance for clinical analysis of ovarian tumors. |
|---|