Prioritising topics for developing e-learning resources in healthcare curricula: A comparison between students and educators using a modified Delphi survey.
<h4>Background</h4>Engaging students in the e-learning development process enhances the effective implementation of e-learning, however, students' priority on the topics for e-learning may differ from that of the educators. This study aims to compare the differences between the stud...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/e3a951d04c9441acbcca6202fed95c80 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:e3a951d04c9441acbcca6202fed95c80 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:e3a951d04c9441acbcca6202fed95c802021-12-02T20:10:07ZPrioritising topics for developing e-learning resources in healthcare curricula: A comparison between students and educators using a modified Delphi survey.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0253471https://doaj.org/article/e3a951d04c9441acbcca6202fed95c802021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253471https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>Engaging students in the e-learning development process enhances the effective implementation of e-learning, however, students' priority on the topics for e-learning may differ from that of the educators. This study aims to compare the differences between the students and their educators in prioritising the topics in three healthcare curricula for reusable e-learning object (RLO) development.<h4>Method</h4>A modified Delphi study was conducted among students and educators from University Malaya (UM), Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) and Taylor's University (TU) on three undergraduate programmes. In Round 1, participants were asked to select the topics from the respective syllabi to be developed into RLOs. Priority ranking was determined by using frequencies and proportions. The first quartile of the prioritised topics was included in Round 2 survey, which the participants were asked to rate the level of priority of each topic using a 5-point Likert scale. The mean score of the topics was compared between students and educators.<h4>Result</h4>A total of 43 educators and 377 students participated in this study. For UM and TU Pharmacy, there was a mismatch in the prioritised topics between the students and educators. For UPM, both the educators and students have prioritised the same topics in both rounds. To harmonise the prioritisation of topics between students and educators for UM and TU Pharmacy, the topics with a higher mean score by both the students and educators were prioritised.<h4>Conclusion</h4>The mismatch in prioritised topics between students and educators uncovered factors that might influence the prioritisation process. This study highlighted the importance of conducting needs assessment at the beginning of eLearning resources development.Hooi Min LimChirk Jenn NgChin Hai TeoPing Yein LeePuteri Shanaz Jahn KassimNurul Amelina NasharuddinPhelim Voon Chen YongPhelim Voon Chen YongRenukha SellappansWei Hsum YapYew Kong LeeZahiruddin Fitri Abu HassanKuhan KrishnanSazlina Shariff GhazaliFaridah IdrisNurhanim HassanEnna AyubStathis KonstantinidisMichael TaylorCherry PoussaKlas KarlgrenNatalia StathakarouPetter MordtArne Thomas NilsenHeather WharradPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 6, p e0253471 (2021) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN |
| topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
| spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Hooi Min Lim Chirk Jenn Ng Chin Hai Teo Ping Yein Lee Puteri Shanaz Jahn Kassim Nurul Amelina Nasharuddin Phelim Voon Chen Yong Phelim Voon Chen Yong Renukha Sellappans Wei Hsum Yap Yew Kong Lee Zahiruddin Fitri Abu Hassan Kuhan Krishnan Sazlina Shariff Ghazali Faridah Idris Nurhanim Hassan Enna Ayub Stathis Konstantinidis Michael Taylor Cherry Poussa Klas Karlgren Natalia Stathakarou Petter Mordt Arne Thomas Nilsen Heather Wharrad Prioritising topics for developing e-learning resources in healthcare curricula: A comparison between students and educators using a modified Delphi survey. |
| description |
<h4>Background</h4>Engaging students in the e-learning development process enhances the effective implementation of e-learning, however, students' priority on the topics for e-learning may differ from that of the educators. This study aims to compare the differences between the students and their educators in prioritising the topics in three healthcare curricula for reusable e-learning object (RLO) development.<h4>Method</h4>A modified Delphi study was conducted among students and educators from University Malaya (UM), Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) and Taylor's University (TU) on three undergraduate programmes. In Round 1, participants were asked to select the topics from the respective syllabi to be developed into RLOs. Priority ranking was determined by using frequencies and proportions. The first quartile of the prioritised topics was included in Round 2 survey, which the participants were asked to rate the level of priority of each topic using a 5-point Likert scale. The mean score of the topics was compared between students and educators.<h4>Result</h4>A total of 43 educators and 377 students participated in this study. For UM and TU Pharmacy, there was a mismatch in the prioritised topics between the students and educators. For UPM, both the educators and students have prioritised the same topics in both rounds. To harmonise the prioritisation of topics between students and educators for UM and TU Pharmacy, the topics with a higher mean score by both the students and educators were prioritised.<h4>Conclusion</h4>The mismatch in prioritised topics between students and educators uncovered factors that might influence the prioritisation process. This study highlighted the importance of conducting needs assessment at the beginning of eLearning resources development. |
| format |
article |
| author |
Hooi Min Lim Chirk Jenn Ng Chin Hai Teo Ping Yein Lee Puteri Shanaz Jahn Kassim Nurul Amelina Nasharuddin Phelim Voon Chen Yong Phelim Voon Chen Yong Renukha Sellappans Wei Hsum Yap Yew Kong Lee Zahiruddin Fitri Abu Hassan Kuhan Krishnan Sazlina Shariff Ghazali Faridah Idris Nurhanim Hassan Enna Ayub Stathis Konstantinidis Michael Taylor Cherry Poussa Klas Karlgren Natalia Stathakarou Petter Mordt Arne Thomas Nilsen Heather Wharrad |
| author_facet |
Hooi Min Lim Chirk Jenn Ng Chin Hai Teo Ping Yein Lee Puteri Shanaz Jahn Kassim Nurul Amelina Nasharuddin Phelim Voon Chen Yong Phelim Voon Chen Yong Renukha Sellappans Wei Hsum Yap Yew Kong Lee Zahiruddin Fitri Abu Hassan Kuhan Krishnan Sazlina Shariff Ghazali Faridah Idris Nurhanim Hassan Enna Ayub Stathis Konstantinidis Michael Taylor Cherry Poussa Klas Karlgren Natalia Stathakarou Petter Mordt Arne Thomas Nilsen Heather Wharrad |
| author_sort |
Hooi Min Lim |
| title |
Prioritising topics for developing e-learning resources in healthcare curricula: A comparison between students and educators using a modified Delphi survey. |
| title_short |
Prioritising topics for developing e-learning resources in healthcare curricula: A comparison between students and educators using a modified Delphi survey. |
| title_full |
Prioritising topics for developing e-learning resources in healthcare curricula: A comparison between students and educators using a modified Delphi survey. |
| title_fullStr |
Prioritising topics for developing e-learning resources in healthcare curricula: A comparison between students and educators using a modified Delphi survey. |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Prioritising topics for developing e-learning resources in healthcare curricula: A comparison between students and educators using a modified Delphi survey. |
| title_sort |
prioritising topics for developing e-learning resources in healthcare curricula: a comparison between students and educators using a modified delphi survey. |
| publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/e3a951d04c9441acbcca6202fed95c80 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT hooiminlim prioritisingtopicsfordevelopingelearningresourcesinhealthcarecurriculaacomparisonbetweenstudentsandeducatorsusingamodifieddelphisurvey AT chirkjennng prioritisingtopicsfordevelopingelearningresourcesinhealthcarecurriculaacomparisonbetweenstudentsandeducatorsusingamodifieddelphisurvey AT chinhaiteo prioritisingtopicsfordevelopingelearningresourcesinhealthcarecurriculaacomparisonbetweenstudentsandeducatorsusingamodifieddelphisurvey AT pingyeinlee prioritisingtopicsfordevelopingelearningresourcesinhealthcarecurriculaacomparisonbetweenstudentsandeducatorsusingamodifieddelphisurvey AT puterishanazjahnkassim prioritisingtopicsfordevelopingelearningresourcesinhealthcarecurriculaacomparisonbetweenstudentsandeducatorsusingamodifieddelphisurvey AT nurulamelinanasharuddin prioritisingtopicsfordevelopingelearningresourcesinhealthcarecurriculaacomparisonbetweenstudentsandeducatorsusingamodifieddelphisurvey AT phelimvoonchenyong prioritisingtopicsfordevelopingelearningresourcesinhealthcarecurriculaacomparisonbetweenstudentsandeducatorsusingamodifieddelphisurvey AT phelimvoonchenyong prioritisingtopicsfordevelopingelearningresourcesinhealthcarecurriculaacomparisonbetweenstudentsandeducatorsusingamodifieddelphisurvey AT renukhasellappans prioritisingtopicsfordevelopingelearningresourcesinhealthcarecurriculaacomparisonbetweenstudentsandeducatorsusingamodifieddelphisurvey AT weihsumyap prioritisingtopicsfordevelopingelearningresourcesinhealthcarecurriculaacomparisonbetweenstudentsandeducatorsusingamodifieddelphisurvey AT yewkonglee prioritisingtopicsfordevelopingelearningresourcesinhealthcarecurriculaacomparisonbetweenstudentsandeducatorsusingamodifieddelphisurvey AT zahiruddinfitriabuhassan prioritisingtopicsfordevelopingelearningresourcesinhealthcarecurriculaacomparisonbetweenstudentsandeducatorsusingamodifieddelphisurvey AT kuhankrishnan prioritisingtopicsfordevelopingelearningresourcesinhealthcarecurriculaacomparisonbetweenstudentsandeducatorsusingamodifieddelphisurvey AT sazlinashariffghazali prioritisingtopicsfordevelopingelearningresourcesinhealthcarecurriculaacomparisonbetweenstudentsandeducatorsusingamodifieddelphisurvey AT faridahidris prioritisingtopicsfordevelopingelearningresourcesinhealthcarecurriculaacomparisonbetweenstudentsandeducatorsusingamodifieddelphisurvey AT nurhanimhassan prioritisingtopicsfordevelopingelearningresourcesinhealthcarecurriculaacomparisonbetweenstudentsandeducatorsusingamodifieddelphisurvey AT ennaayub prioritisingtopicsfordevelopingelearningresourcesinhealthcarecurriculaacomparisonbetweenstudentsandeducatorsusingamodifieddelphisurvey AT stathiskonstantinidis prioritisingtopicsfordevelopingelearningresourcesinhealthcarecurriculaacomparisonbetweenstudentsandeducatorsusingamodifieddelphisurvey AT michaeltaylor prioritisingtopicsfordevelopingelearningresourcesinhealthcarecurriculaacomparisonbetweenstudentsandeducatorsusingamodifieddelphisurvey AT cherrypoussa prioritisingtopicsfordevelopingelearningresourcesinhealthcarecurriculaacomparisonbetweenstudentsandeducatorsusingamodifieddelphisurvey AT klaskarlgren prioritisingtopicsfordevelopingelearningresourcesinhealthcarecurriculaacomparisonbetweenstudentsandeducatorsusingamodifieddelphisurvey AT nataliastathakarou prioritisingtopicsfordevelopingelearningresourcesinhealthcarecurriculaacomparisonbetweenstudentsandeducatorsusingamodifieddelphisurvey AT pettermordt prioritisingtopicsfordevelopingelearningresourcesinhealthcarecurriculaacomparisonbetweenstudentsandeducatorsusingamodifieddelphisurvey AT arnethomasnilsen prioritisingtopicsfordevelopingelearningresourcesinhealthcarecurriculaacomparisonbetweenstudentsandeducatorsusingamodifieddelphisurvey AT heatherwharrad prioritisingtopicsfordevelopingelearningresourcesinhealthcarecurriculaacomparisonbetweenstudentsandeducatorsusingamodifieddelphisurvey |
| _version_ |
1718375031822614528 |