When Enough Is Really Enough? On the Minimum Number of Landslides to Build Reliable Susceptibility Models

Mapping existing landslides is a fundamental prerequisite to build any reliable susceptibility model. From a series of landslide presence/absence conditions and associated landscape characteristics, a binary classifier learns how to distinguish potentially stable and unstable slopes. In data rich ar...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giacomo Titti, Cees van Westen, Lisa Borgatti, Alessandro Pasuto, Luigi Lombardo
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e3ee7785977b41129b7b85a15bcd3af0
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e3ee7785977b41129b7b85a15bcd3af0
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e3ee7785977b41129b7b85a15bcd3af02021-11-25T17:43:08ZWhen Enough Is Really Enough? On the Minimum Number of Landslides to Build Reliable Susceptibility Models10.3390/geosciences111104692076-3263https://doaj.org/article/e3ee7785977b41129b7b85a15bcd3af02021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/11/11/469https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3263Mapping existing landslides is a fundamental prerequisite to build any reliable susceptibility model. From a series of landslide presence/absence conditions and associated landscape characteristics, a binary classifier learns how to distinguish potentially stable and unstable slopes. In data rich areas where landslide inventories are available, addressing the collection of these can already be a challenging task. However, in data scarce contexts, where geoscientists do not get access to pre-existing inventories, the only solution is to map landslides from scratch. This operation can be extremely time-consuming if manually performed or prone to type I errors if done automatically. This is even more exacerbated if done over large geographic regions. In this manuscript we examine the issue of mapping requirements for west Tajikistan where no complete landslide inventory is available. The key question is: How many landslides should be required to develop reliable landslide susceptibility models based on statistical modeling? In fact, for such a wide and extremely complex territory, the collection of an inventory that is sufficiently detailed requires a large investment in time and human resources. However, at which point of the mapping procedure, would the resulting susceptibility model produce significantly better results as compared to a model built with less information? We addressed this question by implementing a binomial Generalized Additive Model trained and validated with different landslide proportions and measured the induced variability in the resulting susceptibility model. The results of this study are very site-specific but we proposed a very functional protocol to investigate a problem which is underestimated in the literature.Giacomo TittiCees van WestenLisa BorgattiAlessandro PasutoLuigi LombardoMDPI AGarticlelandslide inventoryregional landslide susceptibilityINLAunique condition unitGeologyQE1-996.5ENGeosciences, Vol 11, Iss 469, p 469 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic landslide inventory
regional landslide susceptibility
INLA
unique condition unit
Geology
QE1-996.5
spellingShingle landslide inventory
regional landslide susceptibility
INLA
unique condition unit
Geology
QE1-996.5
Giacomo Titti
Cees van Westen
Lisa Borgatti
Alessandro Pasuto
Luigi Lombardo
When Enough Is Really Enough? On the Minimum Number of Landslides to Build Reliable Susceptibility Models
description Mapping existing landslides is a fundamental prerequisite to build any reliable susceptibility model. From a series of landslide presence/absence conditions and associated landscape characteristics, a binary classifier learns how to distinguish potentially stable and unstable slopes. In data rich areas where landslide inventories are available, addressing the collection of these can already be a challenging task. However, in data scarce contexts, where geoscientists do not get access to pre-existing inventories, the only solution is to map landslides from scratch. This operation can be extremely time-consuming if manually performed or prone to type I errors if done automatically. This is even more exacerbated if done over large geographic regions. In this manuscript we examine the issue of mapping requirements for west Tajikistan where no complete landslide inventory is available. The key question is: How many landslides should be required to develop reliable landslide susceptibility models based on statistical modeling? In fact, for such a wide and extremely complex territory, the collection of an inventory that is sufficiently detailed requires a large investment in time and human resources. However, at which point of the mapping procedure, would the resulting susceptibility model produce significantly better results as compared to a model built with less information? We addressed this question by implementing a binomial Generalized Additive Model trained and validated with different landslide proportions and measured the induced variability in the resulting susceptibility model. The results of this study are very site-specific but we proposed a very functional protocol to investigate a problem which is underestimated in the literature.
format article
author Giacomo Titti
Cees van Westen
Lisa Borgatti
Alessandro Pasuto
Luigi Lombardo
author_facet Giacomo Titti
Cees van Westen
Lisa Borgatti
Alessandro Pasuto
Luigi Lombardo
author_sort Giacomo Titti
title When Enough Is Really Enough? On the Minimum Number of Landslides to Build Reliable Susceptibility Models
title_short When Enough Is Really Enough? On the Minimum Number of Landslides to Build Reliable Susceptibility Models
title_full When Enough Is Really Enough? On the Minimum Number of Landslides to Build Reliable Susceptibility Models
title_fullStr When Enough Is Really Enough? On the Minimum Number of Landslides to Build Reliable Susceptibility Models
title_full_unstemmed When Enough Is Really Enough? On the Minimum Number of Landslides to Build Reliable Susceptibility Models
title_sort when enough is really enough? on the minimum number of landslides to build reliable susceptibility models
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/e3ee7785977b41129b7b85a15bcd3af0
work_keys_str_mv AT giacomotitti whenenoughisreallyenoughontheminimumnumberoflandslidestobuildreliablesusceptibilitymodels
AT ceesvanwesten whenenoughisreallyenoughontheminimumnumberoflandslidestobuildreliablesusceptibilitymodels
AT lisaborgatti whenenoughisreallyenoughontheminimumnumberoflandslidestobuildreliablesusceptibilitymodels
AT alessandropasuto whenenoughisreallyenoughontheminimumnumberoflandslidestobuildreliablesusceptibilitymodels
AT luigilombardo whenenoughisreallyenoughontheminimumnumberoflandslidestobuildreliablesusceptibilitymodels
_version_ 1718412079164030976