Detectability of Head and Neck Cancer via New Computed Tomography Reconstruction Tools including Iterative Reconstruction and Metal Artifact Reduction

State-of-the-art technology in Computed Tomography (CT) includes iterative reconstruction algorithms (IR) and metal artefact reduction (MAR) techniques. The objective of the study is to show the benefits of this technology for the detection of primary and recurrent head and neck cancer. A total of 1...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daniel Troeltzsch, Seyd Shnayien, Max Heiland, Kilian Kreutzer, Jan-Dirk Raguse, Bernd Hamm, Stefan M. Niehues
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
SCC
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e4037b6ecf7f4d17a1686ab978cb0b16
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e4037b6ecf7f4d17a1686ab978cb0b16
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e4037b6ecf7f4d17a1686ab978cb0b162021-11-25T17:22:06ZDetectability of Head and Neck Cancer via New Computed Tomography Reconstruction Tools including Iterative Reconstruction and Metal Artifact Reduction10.3390/diagnostics111121542075-4418https://doaj.org/article/e4037b6ecf7f4d17a1686ab978cb0b162021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/11/11/2154https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4418State-of-the-art technology in Computed Tomography (CT) includes iterative reconstruction algorithms (IR) and metal artefact reduction (MAR) techniques. The objective of the study is to show the benefits of this technology for the detection of primary and recurrent head and neck cancer. A total of 131 patients underwent contrast-enhanced CT for diagnosis of primary and recurrent Head and Neck cancer; 110 patients were included. All scans were reconstructed using iterative reconstruction, and metal artifact reduction was applied when indicated. Tumor detectability was evaluated dichotomously. Histopathological findings were used as a standard of reference. Data were analyzed retrospectively, statistics was performed through diagnostic test characteristics. State-of-the-art Head and Neck CT showed a sensitivity of 0.83 (95% CI; 0.61–0.95) with 0.93 specificity (95% CI; 0.84–0.98) for primary tumor detection. Recurrent tumors were identified with a 0.94 sensitivity (95% CI; 0.71–0.99) and 0.93 specificity (95% CI; 0.84–0.98) in this study. Conclusion: State-of-the-art reconstruction tools improve the diagnostic quality of Head and Neck CT, especially for recurrent tumor detection, compared with data published for standard CT. IR and MAR are easily implemented in routine clinical settings and improve image evaluation by reducing artifacts and image noise while lowering radiation exposure.Daniel TroeltzschSeyd ShnayienMax HeilandKilian KreutzerJan-Dirk RaguseBernd HammStefan M. NiehuesMDPI AGarticlecancer diagnosticshead and neck cancerOSCCSCCiterative reconstructioncomputed tomographyMedicine (General)R5-920ENDiagnostics, Vol 11, Iss 2154, p 2154 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic cancer diagnostics
head and neck cancer
OSCC
SCC
iterative reconstruction
computed tomography
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle cancer diagnostics
head and neck cancer
OSCC
SCC
iterative reconstruction
computed tomography
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Daniel Troeltzsch
Seyd Shnayien
Max Heiland
Kilian Kreutzer
Jan-Dirk Raguse
Bernd Hamm
Stefan M. Niehues
Detectability of Head and Neck Cancer via New Computed Tomography Reconstruction Tools including Iterative Reconstruction and Metal Artifact Reduction
description State-of-the-art technology in Computed Tomography (CT) includes iterative reconstruction algorithms (IR) and metal artefact reduction (MAR) techniques. The objective of the study is to show the benefits of this technology for the detection of primary and recurrent head and neck cancer. A total of 131 patients underwent contrast-enhanced CT for diagnosis of primary and recurrent Head and Neck cancer; 110 patients were included. All scans were reconstructed using iterative reconstruction, and metal artifact reduction was applied when indicated. Tumor detectability was evaluated dichotomously. Histopathological findings were used as a standard of reference. Data were analyzed retrospectively, statistics was performed through diagnostic test characteristics. State-of-the-art Head and Neck CT showed a sensitivity of 0.83 (95% CI; 0.61–0.95) with 0.93 specificity (95% CI; 0.84–0.98) for primary tumor detection. Recurrent tumors were identified with a 0.94 sensitivity (95% CI; 0.71–0.99) and 0.93 specificity (95% CI; 0.84–0.98) in this study. Conclusion: State-of-the-art reconstruction tools improve the diagnostic quality of Head and Neck CT, especially for recurrent tumor detection, compared with data published for standard CT. IR and MAR are easily implemented in routine clinical settings and improve image evaluation by reducing artifacts and image noise while lowering radiation exposure.
format article
author Daniel Troeltzsch
Seyd Shnayien
Max Heiland
Kilian Kreutzer
Jan-Dirk Raguse
Bernd Hamm
Stefan M. Niehues
author_facet Daniel Troeltzsch
Seyd Shnayien
Max Heiland
Kilian Kreutzer
Jan-Dirk Raguse
Bernd Hamm
Stefan M. Niehues
author_sort Daniel Troeltzsch
title Detectability of Head and Neck Cancer via New Computed Tomography Reconstruction Tools including Iterative Reconstruction and Metal Artifact Reduction
title_short Detectability of Head and Neck Cancer via New Computed Tomography Reconstruction Tools including Iterative Reconstruction and Metal Artifact Reduction
title_full Detectability of Head and Neck Cancer via New Computed Tomography Reconstruction Tools including Iterative Reconstruction and Metal Artifact Reduction
title_fullStr Detectability of Head and Neck Cancer via New Computed Tomography Reconstruction Tools including Iterative Reconstruction and Metal Artifact Reduction
title_full_unstemmed Detectability of Head and Neck Cancer via New Computed Tomography Reconstruction Tools including Iterative Reconstruction and Metal Artifact Reduction
title_sort detectability of head and neck cancer via new computed tomography reconstruction tools including iterative reconstruction and metal artifact reduction
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/e4037b6ecf7f4d17a1686ab978cb0b16
work_keys_str_mv AT danieltroeltzsch detectabilityofheadandneckcancervianewcomputedtomographyreconstructiontoolsincludingiterativereconstructionandmetalartifactreduction
AT seydshnayien detectabilityofheadandneckcancervianewcomputedtomographyreconstructiontoolsincludingiterativereconstructionandmetalartifactreduction
AT maxheiland detectabilityofheadandneckcancervianewcomputedtomographyreconstructiontoolsincludingiterativereconstructionandmetalartifactreduction
AT kiliankreutzer detectabilityofheadandneckcancervianewcomputedtomographyreconstructiontoolsincludingiterativereconstructionandmetalartifactreduction
AT jandirkraguse detectabilityofheadandneckcancervianewcomputedtomographyreconstructiontoolsincludingiterativereconstructionandmetalartifactreduction
AT berndhamm detectabilityofheadandneckcancervianewcomputedtomographyreconstructiontoolsincludingiterativereconstructionandmetalartifactreduction
AT stefanmniehues detectabilityofheadandneckcancervianewcomputedtomographyreconstructiontoolsincludingiterativereconstructionandmetalartifactreduction
_version_ 1718412501681438720