Technology Adoption and Learning-by-Doing: The Case of Bt Cotton Adoption in China

Although the benefits of genetically modified (GM) crops have been well documented, how do farmers manage the risk of new technology in the early stages of technology adoption has received less attention. We compare the total factor productivity (TFP) of cotton to other major crops (wheat, rice, and...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guang Tian, Xiaoxue Du, Fangbin Qiao, Andres Trujillo-Barrera
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e426ece0394c4d64bd2f00654a5a26d4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e426ece0394c4d64bd2f00654a5a26d4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e426ece0394c4d64bd2f00654a5a26d42021-11-25T18:08:33ZTechnology Adoption and Learning-by-Doing: The Case of Bt Cotton Adoption in China10.3390/jrfm141105241911-80741911-8066https://doaj.org/article/e426ece0394c4d64bd2f00654a5a26d42021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/11/524https://doaj.org/toc/1911-8066https://doaj.org/toc/1911-8074Although the benefits of genetically modified (GM) crops have been well documented, how do farmers manage the risk of new technology in the early stages of technology adoption has received less attention. We compare the total factor productivity (TFP) of cotton to other major crops (wheat, rice, and corn) in China between 1990 and 2015, showing that the TFP growth of cotton production is significantly different from all other crops. In particular, the TFP of cotton production increased rapidly in the early 1990s then declined slightly around 2000 and rose again. This pattern coincides with the adoption of Bt cotton process in China. To further investigate the decline of TFP in the early stages of Bt cotton adoption, using aggregate provincial-level data, we implement a TFP decomposition and show that the productivity of GM technology is higher, whereas the technical efficiency of GM technology is lower than that of traditional technologies. Especially, Bt cotton exhibited lower technical efficiency because farmers did not reduce the use of pesticide when they first started to adopt Bt cotton. In addition, we illustrate the occurrence of a learning process as GM technology diffuses throughout China: after farmers gain knowledge of Bt cotton, pesticide use declines and technical efficiency improves.Guang TianXiaoxue DuFangbin QiaoAndres Trujillo-BarreraMDPI AGarticlegenetically modified cropstechnical efficiencytotal factor productivityBt cottonrisk managementRisk in industry. Risk managementHD61FinanceHG1-9999ENJournal of Risk and Financial Management, Vol 14, Iss 524, p 524 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic genetically modified crops
technical efficiency
total factor productivity
Bt cotton
risk management
Risk in industry. Risk management
HD61
Finance
HG1-9999
spellingShingle genetically modified crops
technical efficiency
total factor productivity
Bt cotton
risk management
Risk in industry. Risk management
HD61
Finance
HG1-9999
Guang Tian
Xiaoxue Du
Fangbin Qiao
Andres Trujillo-Barrera
Technology Adoption and Learning-by-Doing: The Case of Bt Cotton Adoption in China
description Although the benefits of genetically modified (GM) crops have been well documented, how do farmers manage the risk of new technology in the early stages of technology adoption has received less attention. We compare the total factor productivity (TFP) of cotton to other major crops (wheat, rice, and corn) in China between 1990 and 2015, showing that the TFP growth of cotton production is significantly different from all other crops. In particular, the TFP of cotton production increased rapidly in the early 1990s then declined slightly around 2000 and rose again. This pattern coincides with the adoption of Bt cotton process in China. To further investigate the decline of TFP in the early stages of Bt cotton adoption, using aggregate provincial-level data, we implement a TFP decomposition and show that the productivity of GM technology is higher, whereas the technical efficiency of GM technology is lower than that of traditional technologies. Especially, Bt cotton exhibited lower technical efficiency because farmers did not reduce the use of pesticide when they first started to adopt Bt cotton. In addition, we illustrate the occurrence of a learning process as GM technology diffuses throughout China: after farmers gain knowledge of Bt cotton, pesticide use declines and technical efficiency improves.
format article
author Guang Tian
Xiaoxue Du
Fangbin Qiao
Andres Trujillo-Barrera
author_facet Guang Tian
Xiaoxue Du
Fangbin Qiao
Andres Trujillo-Barrera
author_sort Guang Tian
title Technology Adoption and Learning-by-Doing: The Case of Bt Cotton Adoption in China
title_short Technology Adoption and Learning-by-Doing: The Case of Bt Cotton Adoption in China
title_full Technology Adoption and Learning-by-Doing: The Case of Bt Cotton Adoption in China
title_fullStr Technology Adoption and Learning-by-Doing: The Case of Bt Cotton Adoption in China
title_full_unstemmed Technology Adoption and Learning-by-Doing: The Case of Bt Cotton Adoption in China
title_sort technology adoption and learning-by-doing: the case of bt cotton adoption in china
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/e426ece0394c4d64bd2f00654a5a26d4
work_keys_str_mv AT guangtian technologyadoptionandlearningbydoingthecaseofbtcottonadoptioninchina
AT xiaoxuedu technologyadoptionandlearningbydoingthecaseofbtcottonadoptioninchina
AT fangbinqiao technologyadoptionandlearningbydoingthecaseofbtcottonadoptioninchina
AT andrestrujillobarrera technologyadoptionandlearningbydoingthecaseofbtcottonadoptioninchina
_version_ 1718411591474479104