Technology Adoption and Learning-by-Doing: The Case of Bt Cotton Adoption in China
Although the benefits of genetically modified (GM) crops have been well documented, how do farmers manage the risk of new technology in the early stages of technology adoption has received less attention. We compare the total factor productivity (TFP) of cotton to other major crops (wheat, rice, and...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/e426ece0394c4d64bd2f00654a5a26d4 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:e426ece0394c4d64bd2f00654a5a26d4 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:e426ece0394c4d64bd2f00654a5a26d42021-11-25T18:08:33ZTechnology Adoption and Learning-by-Doing: The Case of Bt Cotton Adoption in China10.3390/jrfm141105241911-80741911-8066https://doaj.org/article/e426ece0394c4d64bd2f00654a5a26d42021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/11/524https://doaj.org/toc/1911-8066https://doaj.org/toc/1911-8074Although the benefits of genetically modified (GM) crops have been well documented, how do farmers manage the risk of new technology in the early stages of technology adoption has received less attention. We compare the total factor productivity (TFP) of cotton to other major crops (wheat, rice, and corn) in China between 1990 and 2015, showing that the TFP growth of cotton production is significantly different from all other crops. In particular, the TFP of cotton production increased rapidly in the early 1990s then declined slightly around 2000 and rose again. This pattern coincides with the adoption of Bt cotton process in China. To further investigate the decline of TFP in the early stages of Bt cotton adoption, using aggregate provincial-level data, we implement a TFP decomposition and show that the productivity of GM technology is higher, whereas the technical efficiency of GM technology is lower than that of traditional technologies. Especially, Bt cotton exhibited lower technical efficiency because farmers did not reduce the use of pesticide when they first started to adopt Bt cotton. In addition, we illustrate the occurrence of a learning process as GM technology diffuses throughout China: after farmers gain knowledge of Bt cotton, pesticide use declines and technical efficiency improves.Guang TianXiaoxue DuFangbin QiaoAndres Trujillo-BarreraMDPI AGarticlegenetically modified cropstechnical efficiencytotal factor productivityBt cottonrisk managementRisk in industry. Risk managementHD61FinanceHG1-9999ENJournal of Risk and Financial Management, Vol 14, Iss 524, p 524 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
genetically modified crops technical efficiency total factor productivity Bt cotton risk management Risk in industry. Risk management HD61 Finance HG1-9999 |
spellingShingle |
genetically modified crops technical efficiency total factor productivity Bt cotton risk management Risk in industry. Risk management HD61 Finance HG1-9999 Guang Tian Xiaoxue Du Fangbin Qiao Andres Trujillo-Barrera Technology Adoption and Learning-by-Doing: The Case of Bt Cotton Adoption in China |
description |
Although the benefits of genetically modified (GM) crops have been well documented, how do farmers manage the risk of new technology in the early stages of technology adoption has received less attention. We compare the total factor productivity (TFP) of cotton to other major crops (wheat, rice, and corn) in China between 1990 and 2015, showing that the TFP growth of cotton production is significantly different from all other crops. In particular, the TFP of cotton production increased rapidly in the early 1990s then declined slightly around 2000 and rose again. This pattern coincides with the adoption of Bt cotton process in China. To further investigate the decline of TFP in the early stages of Bt cotton adoption, using aggregate provincial-level data, we implement a TFP decomposition and show that the productivity of GM technology is higher, whereas the technical efficiency of GM technology is lower than that of traditional technologies. Especially, Bt cotton exhibited lower technical efficiency because farmers did not reduce the use of pesticide when they first started to adopt Bt cotton. In addition, we illustrate the occurrence of a learning process as GM technology diffuses throughout China: after farmers gain knowledge of Bt cotton, pesticide use declines and technical efficiency improves. |
format |
article |
author |
Guang Tian Xiaoxue Du Fangbin Qiao Andres Trujillo-Barrera |
author_facet |
Guang Tian Xiaoxue Du Fangbin Qiao Andres Trujillo-Barrera |
author_sort |
Guang Tian |
title |
Technology Adoption and Learning-by-Doing: The Case of Bt Cotton Adoption in China |
title_short |
Technology Adoption and Learning-by-Doing: The Case of Bt Cotton Adoption in China |
title_full |
Technology Adoption and Learning-by-Doing: The Case of Bt Cotton Adoption in China |
title_fullStr |
Technology Adoption and Learning-by-Doing: The Case of Bt Cotton Adoption in China |
title_full_unstemmed |
Technology Adoption and Learning-by-Doing: The Case of Bt Cotton Adoption in China |
title_sort |
technology adoption and learning-by-doing: the case of bt cotton adoption in china |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/e426ece0394c4d64bd2f00654a5a26d4 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT guangtian technologyadoptionandlearningbydoingthecaseofbtcottonadoptioninchina AT xiaoxuedu technologyadoptionandlearningbydoingthecaseofbtcottonadoptioninchina AT fangbinqiao technologyadoptionandlearningbydoingthecaseofbtcottonadoptioninchina AT andrestrujillobarrera technologyadoptionandlearningbydoingthecaseofbtcottonadoptioninchina |
_version_ |
1718411591474479104 |