Tobacco price and use following California Proposition 56 tobacco tax increase.

<h4>Background</h4>California Proposition 56 increased cigarette excise tax by $2 per pack with equivalent increases on non-cigarette tobacco products. We estimated the changes in cigarette price, cigarette use, and non-cigarette use following the implementation of Proposition 56 in Cali...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christian Gunadi, Tarik Benmarhnia, Martha White, John P Pierce, Sara B McMenamin, Eric C Leas, Yuyan Shi
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e42b8f3903b54f009d99c04ffb29a68b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e42b8f3903b54f009d99c04ffb29a68b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e42b8f3903b54f009d99c04ffb29a68b2021-12-02T20:16:59ZTobacco price and use following California Proposition 56 tobacco tax increase.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0257553https://doaj.org/article/e42b8f3903b54f009d99c04ffb29a68b2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257553https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>California Proposition 56 increased cigarette excise tax by $2 per pack with equivalent increases on non-cigarette tobacco products. We estimated the changes in cigarette price, cigarette use, and non-cigarette use following the implementation of Proposition 56 in California in 2017.<h4>Methods</h4>Seven waves of Tobacco Use Supplements to the Current Population Survey (TUS-CPS) 2011-2019 data were used to obtain state-level aggregate self-reported outcomes, including cigarette price per pack, current and daily cigarette use, cigarette consumption per day, and current and daily use of non-cigarette tobacco products (hookah, pipe, cigar, and smokeless tobacco). A modified version of a synthetic control method was used to create a "synthetic" California that best resembled pre-policy sociodemographic characteristics and outcome trends in California while correcting time-invariant pre-policy differences. Various sensitivity analyses were also conducted.<h4>Results</h4>The implementation of Proposition 56 was associated with an increase in self-reported cigarette price per pack in California ($1.844, 95%CI: $0.153, $3.534; p = 0.032). No evidence suggested that Proposition 56 was associated with the changes in the prevalence of current or daily cigarette use, cigarette consumption per day, or the prevalence of current or daily use of non-cigarette tobacco products.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Most of the cigarette tax increase following Proposition 56 in California was passed on to consumers. There is a lack of evidence that the implementation of Proposition 56 was associated with the changes in the use of cigarettes and other tobacco products such as hookah, pipe, cigar, and smokeless tobacco.Christian GunadiTarik BenmarhniaMartha WhiteJohn P PierceSara B McMenaminEric C LeasYuyan ShiPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 10, p e0257553 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Christian Gunadi
Tarik Benmarhnia
Martha White
John P Pierce
Sara B McMenamin
Eric C Leas
Yuyan Shi
Tobacco price and use following California Proposition 56 tobacco tax increase.
description <h4>Background</h4>California Proposition 56 increased cigarette excise tax by $2 per pack with equivalent increases on non-cigarette tobacco products. We estimated the changes in cigarette price, cigarette use, and non-cigarette use following the implementation of Proposition 56 in California in 2017.<h4>Methods</h4>Seven waves of Tobacco Use Supplements to the Current Population Survey (TUS-CPS) 2011-2019 data were used to obtain state-level aggregate self-reported outcomes, including cigarette price per pack, current and daily cigarette use, cigarette consumption per day, and current and daily use of non-cigarette tobacco products (hookah, pipe, cigar, and smokeless tobacco). A modified version of a synthetic control method was used to create a "synthetic" California that best resembled pre-policy sociodemographic characteristics and outcome trends in California while correcting time-invariant pre-policy differences. Various sensitivity analyses were also conducted.<h4>Results</h4>The implementation of Proposition 56 was associated with an increase in self-reported cigarette price per pack in California ($1.844, 95%CI: $0.153, $3.534; p = 0.032). No evidence suggested that Proposition 56 was associated with the changes in the prevalence of current or daily cigarette use, cigarette consumption per day, or the prevalence of current or daily use of non-cigarette tobacco products.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Most of the cigarette tax increase following Proposition 56 in California was passed on to consumers. There is a lack of evidence that the implementation of Proposition 56 was associated with the changes in the use of cigarettes and other tobacco products such as hookah, pipe, cigar, and smokeless tobacco.
format article
author Christian Gunadi
Tarik Benmarhnia
Martha White
John P Pierce
Sara B McMenamin
Eric C Leas
Yuyan Shi
author_facet Christian Gunadi
Tarik Benmarhnia
Martha White
John P Pierce
Sara B McMenamin
Eric C Leas
Yuyan Shi
author_sort Christian Gunadi
title Tobacco price and use following California Proposition 56 tobacco tax increase.
title_short Tobacco price and use following California Proposition 56 tobacco tax increase.
title_full Tobacco price and use following California Proposition 56 tobacco tax increase.
title_fullStr Tobacco price and use following California Proposition 56 tobacco tax increase.
title_full_unstemmed Tobacco price and use following California Proposition 56 tobacco tax increase.
title_sort tobacco price and use following california proposition 56 tobacco tax increase.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/e42b8f3903b54f009d99c04ffb29a68b
work_keys_str_mv AT christiangunadi tobaccopriceandusefollowingcaliforniaproposition56tobaccotaxincrease
AT tarikbenmarhnia tobaccopriceandusefollowingcaliforniaproposition56tobaccotaxincrease
AT marthawhite tobaccopriceandusefollowingcaliforniaproposition56tobaccotaxincrease
AT johnppierce tobaccopriceandusefollowingcaliforniaproposition56tobaccotaxincrease
AT sarabmcmenamin tobaccopriceandusefollowingcaliforniaproposition56tobaccotaxincrease
AT ericcleas tobaccopriceandusefollowingcaliforniaproposition56tobaccotaxincrease
AT yuyanshi tobaccopriceandusefollowingcaliforniaproposition56tobaccotaxincrease
_version_ 1718374435611738112