Tobacco price and use following California Proposition 56 tobacco tax increase.
<h4>Background</h4>California Proposition 56 increased cigarette excise tax by $2 per pack with equivalent increases on non-cigarette tobacco products. We estimated the changes in cigarette price, cigarette use, and non-cigarette use following the implementation of Proposition 56 in Cali...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/e42b8f3903b54f009d99c04ffb29a68b |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:e42b8f3903b54f009d99c04ffb29a68b |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:e42b8f3903b54f009d99c04ffb29a68b2021-12-02T20:16:59ZTobacco price and use following California Proposition 56 tobacco tax increase.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0257553https://doaj.org/article/e42b8f3903b54f009d99c04ffb29a68b2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257553https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>California Proposition 56 increased cigarette excise tax by $2 per pack with equivalent increases on non-cigarette tobacco products. We estimated the changes in cigarette price, cigarette use, and non-cigarette use following the implementation of Proposition 56 in California in 2017.<h4>Methods</h4>Seven waves of Tobacco Use Supplements to the Current Population Survey (TUS-CPS) 2011-2019 data were used to obtain state-level aggregate self-reported outcomes, including cigarette price per pack, current and daily cigarette use, cigarette consumption per day, and current and daily use of non-cigarette tobacco products (hookah, pipe, cigar, and smokeless tobacco). A modified version of a synthetic control method was used to create a "synthetic" California that best resembled pre-policy sociodemographic characteristics and outcome trends in California while correcting time-invariant pre-policy differences. Various sensitivity analyses were also conducted.<h4>Results</h4>The implementation of Proposition 56 was associated with an increase in self-reported cigarette price per pack in California ($1.844, 95%CI: $0.153, $3.534; p = 0.032). No evidence suggested that Proposition 56 was associated with the changes in the prevalence of current or daily cigarette use, cigarette consumption per day, or the prevalence of current or daily use of non-cigarette tobacco products.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Most of the cigarette tax increase following Proposition 56 in California was passed on to consumers. There is a lack of evidence that the implementation of Proposition 56 was associated with the changes in the use of cigarettes and other tobacco products such as hookah, pipe, cigar, and smokeless tobacco.Christian GunadiTarik BenmarhniaMartha WhiteJohn P PierceSara B McMenaminEric C LeasYuyan ShiPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 10, p e0257553 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Christian Gunadi Tarik Benmarhnia Martha White John P Pierce Sara B McMenamin Eric C Leas Yuyan Shi Tobacco price and use following California Proposition 56 tobacco tax increase. |
description |
<h4>Background</h4>California Proposition 56 increased cigarette excise tax by $2 per pack with equivalent increases on non-cigarette tobacco products. We estimated the changes in cigarette price, cigarette use, and non-cigarette use following the implementation of Proposition 56 in California in 2017.<h4>Methods</h4>Seven waves of Tobacco Use Supplements to the Current Population Survey (TUS-CPS) 2011-2019 data were used to obtain state-level aggregate self-reported outcomes, including cigarette price per pack, current and daily cigarette use, cigarette consumption per day, and current and daily use of non-cigarette tobacco products (hookah, pipe, cigar, and smokeless tobacco). A modified version of a synthetic control method was used to create a "synthetic" California that best resembled pre-policy sociodemographic characteristics and outcome trends in California while correcting time-invariant pre-policy differences. Various sensitivity analyses were also conducted.<h4>Results</h4>The implementation of Proposition 56 was associated with an increase in self-reported cigarette price per pack in California ($1.844, 95%CI: $0.153, $3.534; p = 0.032). No evidence suggested that Proposition 56 was associated with the changes in the prevalence of current or daily cigarette use, cigarette consumption per day, or the prevalence of current or daily use of non-cigarette tobacco products.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Most of the cigarette tax increase following Proposition 56 in California was passed on to consumers. There is a lack of evidence that the implementation of Proposition 56 was associated with the changes in the use of cigarettes and other tobacco products such as hookah, pipe, cigar, and smokeless tobacco. |
format |
article |
author |
Christian Gunadi Tarik Benmarhnia Martha White John P Pierce Sara B McMenamin Eric C Leas Yuyan Shi |
author_facet |
Christian Gunadi Tarik Benmarhnia Martha White John P Pierce Sara B McMenamin Eric C Leas Yuyan Shi |
author_sort |
Christian Gunadi |
title |
Tobacco price and use following California Proposition 56 tobacco tax increase. |
title_short |
Tobacco price and use following California Proposition 56 tobacco tax increase. |
title_full |
Tobacco price and use following California Proposition 56 tobacco tax increase. |
title_fullStr |
Tobacco price and use following California Proposition 56 tobacco tax increase. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tobacco price and use following California Proposition 56 tobacco tax increase. |
title_sort |
tobacco price and use following california proposition 56 tobacco tax increase. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/e42b8f3903b54f009d99c04ffb29a68b |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT christiangunadi tobaccopriceandusefollowingcaliforniaproposition56tobaccotaxincrease AT tarikbenmarhnia tobaccopriceandusefollowingcaliforniaproposition56tobaccotaxincrease AT marthawhite tobaccopriceandusefollowingcaliforniaproposition56tobaccotaxincrease AT johnppierce tobaccopriceandusefollowingcaliforniaproposition56tobaccotaxincrease AT sarabmcmenamin tobaccopriceandusefollowingcaliforniaproposition56tobaccotaxincrease AT ericcleas tobaccopriceandusefollowingcaliforniaproposition56tobaccotaxincrease AT yuyanshi tobaccopriceandusefollowingcaliforniaproposition56tobaccotaxincrease |
_version_ |
1718374435611738112 |