Bayesian Estimation for the Coefficients of Variation of Birnbaum–Saunders Distributions
The Birnbaum–Saunders (BS) distribution, which is asymmetric with non-negative support, can be transformed to a normal distribution, which is symmetric. Therefore, the BS distribution is useful for describing data comprising values greater than zero. The coefficient of variation (CV), which is an im...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/e4731014e9994b12b392d3a117d3a0d9 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:e4731014e9994b12b392d3a117d3a0d9 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:e4731014e9994b12b392d3a117d3a0d92021-11-25T19:06:58ZBayesian Estimation for the Coefficients of Variation of Birnbaum–Saunders Distributions10.3390/sym131121302073-8994https://doaj.org/article/e4731014e9994b12b392d3a117d3a0d92021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/13/11/2130https://doaj.org/toc/2073-8994The Birnbaum–Saunders (BS) distribution, which is asymmetric with non-negative support, can be transformed to a normal distribution, which is symmetric. Therefore, the BS distribution is useful for describing data comprising values greater than zero. The coefficient of variation (CV), which is an important descriptive statistic for explaining variation within a dataset, has not previously been used for statistical inference on a BS distribution. The aim of this study is to present four methods for constructing confidence intervals for the CV, and the difference between the CVs of BS distributions. The proposed methods are based on the generalized confidence interval (GCI), a bootstrapped confidence interval (BCI), a Bayesian credible interval (BayCI), and the highest posterior density (HPD) interval. A Monte Carlo simulation study was conducted to evaluate their performances in terms of coverage probability and average length. The results indicate that the HPD interval was the best-performing method overall. PM 2.5 concentration data for Chiang Mai, Thailand, collected in March and April 2019, were used to illustrate the efficacies of the proposed methods, the results of which were in good agreement with the simulation study findings.Wisunee PuggardSa-Aat NiwitpongSuparat NiwitpongMDPI AGarticleconfidence intervalBirnbaum–Saunders distributioncoefficient of variationbootstrapgeneralized confidence intervalBayesianMathematicsQA1-939ENSymmetry, Vol 13, Iss 2130, p 2130 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
confidence interval Birnbaum–Saunders distribution coefficient of variation bootstrap generalized confidence interval Bayesian Mathematics QA1-939 |
spellingShingle |
confidence interval Birnbaum–Saunders distribution coefficient of variation bootstrap generalized confidence interval Bayesian Mathematics QA1-939 Wisunee Puggard Sa-Aat Niwitpong Suparat Niwitpong Bayesian Estimation for the Coefficients of Variation of Birnbaum–Saunders Distributions |
description |
The Birnbaum–Saunders (BS) distribution, which is asymmetric with non-negative support, can be transformed to a normal distribution, which is symmetric. Therefore, the BS distribution is useful for describing data comprising values greater than zero. The coefficient of variation (CV), which is an important descriptive statistic for explaining variation within a dataset, has not previously been used for statistical inference on a BS distribution. The aim of this study is to present four methods for constructing confidence intervals for the CV, and the difference between the CVs of BS distributions. The proposed methods are based on the generalized confidence interval (GCI), a bootstrapped confidence interval (BCI), a Bayesian credible interval (BayCI), and the highest posterior density (HPD) interval. A Monte Carlo simulation study was conducted to evaluate their performances in terms of coverage probability and average length. The results indicate that the HPD interval was the best-performing method overall. PM 2.5 concentration data for Chiang Mai, Thailand, collected in March and April 2019, were used to illustrate the efficacies of the proposed methods, the results of which were in good agreement with the simulation study findings. |
format |
article |
author |
Wisunee Puggard Sa-Aat Niwitpong Suparat Niwitpong |
author_facet |
Wisunee Puggard Sa-Aat Niwitpong Suparat Niwitpong |
author_sort |
Wisunee Puggard |
title |
Bayesian Estimation for the Coefficients of Variation of Birnbaum–Saunders Distributions |
title_short |
Bayesian Estimation for the Coefficients of Variation of Birnbaum–Saunders Distributions |
title_full |
Bayesian Estimation for the Coefficients of Variation of Birnbaum–Saunders Distributions |
title_fullStr |
Bayesian Estimation for the Coefficients of Variation of Birnbaum–Saunders Distributions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bayesian Estimation for the Coefficients of Variation of Birnbaum–Saunders Distributions |
title_sort |
bayesian estimation for the coefficients of variation of birnbaum–saunders distributions |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/e4731014e9994b12b392d3a117d3a0d9 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wisuneepuggard bayesianestimationforthecoefficientsofvariationofbirnbaumsaundersdistributions AT saaatniwitpong bayesianestimationforthecoefficientsofvariationofbirnbaumsaundersdistributions AT suparatniwitpong bayesianestimationforthecoefficientsofvariationofbirnbaumsaundersdistributions |
_version_ |
1718410312031404032 |