Bayesian Estimation for the Coefficients of Variation of Birnbaum–Saunders Distributions

The Birnbaum–Saunders (BS) distribution, which is asymmetric with non-negative support, can be transformed to a normal distribution, which is symmetric. Therefore, the BS distribution is useful for describing data comprising values greater than zero. The coefficient of variation (CV), which is an im...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wisunee Puggard, Sa-Aat Niwitpong, Suparat Niwitpong
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e4731014e9994b12b392d3a117d3a0d9
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e4731014e9994b12b392d3a117d3a0d9
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e4731014e9994b12b392d3a117d3a0d92021-11-25T19:06:58ZBayesian Estimation for the Coefficients of Variation of Birnbaum–Saunders Distributions10.3390/sym131121302073-8994https://doaj.org/article/e4731014e9994b12b392d3a117d3a0d92021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/13/11/2130https://doaj.org/toc/2073-8994The Birnbaum–Saunders (BS) distribution, which is asymmetric with non-negative support, can be transformed to a normal distribution, which is symmetric. Therefore, the BS distribution is useful for describing data comprising values greater than zero. The coefficient of variation (CV), which is an important descriptive statistic for explaining variation within a dataset, has not previously been used for statistical inference on a BS distribution. The aim of this study is to present four methods for constructing confidence intervals for the CV, and the difference between the CVs of BS distributions. The proposed methods are based on the generalized confidence interval (GCI), a bootstrapped confidence interval (BCI), a Bayesian credible interval (BayCI), and the highest posterior density (HPD) interval. A Monte Carlo simulation study was conducted to evaluate their performances in terms of coverage probability and average length. The results indicate that the HPD interval was the best-performing method overall. PM 2.5 concentration data for Chiang Mai, Thailand, collected in March and April 2019, were used to illustrate the efficacies of the proposed methods, the results of which were in good agreement with the simulation study findings.Wisunee PuggardSa-Aat NiwitpongSuparat NiwitpongMDPI AGarticleconfidence intervalBirnbaum–Saunders distributioncoefficient of variationbootstrapgeneralized confidence intervalBayesianMathematicsQA1-939ENSymmetry, Vol 13, Iss 2130, p 2130 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic confidence interval
Birnbaum–Saunders distribution
coefficient of variation
bootstrap
generalized confidence interval
Bayesian
Mathematics
QA1-939
spellingShingle confidence interval
Birnbaum–Saunders distribution
coefficient of variation
bootstrap
generalized confidence interval
Bayesian
Mathematics
QA1-939
Wisunee Puggard
Sa-Aat Niwitpong
Suparat Niwitpong
Bayesian Estimation for the Coefficients of Variation of Birnbaum–Saunders Distributions
description The Birnbaum–Saunders (BS) distribution, which is asymmetric with non-negative support, can be transformed to a normal distribution, which is symmetric. Therefore, the BS distribution is useful for describing data comprising values greater than zero. The coefficient of variation (CV), which is an important descriptive statistic for explaining variation within a dataset, has not previously been used for statistical inference on a BS distribution. The aim of this study is to present four methods for constructing confidence intervals for the CV, and the difference between the CVs of BS distributions. The proposed methods are based on the generalized confidence interval (GCI), a bootstrapped confidence interval (BCI), a Bayesian credible interval (BayCI), and the highest posterior density (HPD) interval. A Monte Carlo simulation study was conducted to evaluate their performances in terms of coverage probability and average length. The results indicate that the HPD interval was the best-performing method overall. PM 2.5 concentration data for Chiang Mai, Thailand, collected in March and April 2019, were used to illustrate the efficacies of the proposed methods, the results of which were in good agreement with the simulation study findings.
format article
author Wisunee Puggard
Sa-Aat Niwitpong
Suparat Niwitpong
author_facet Wisunee Puggard
Sa-Aat Niwitpong
Suparat Niwitpong
author_sort Wisunee Puggard
title Bayesian Estimation for the Coefficients of Variation of Birnbaum–Saunders Distributions
title_short Bayesian Estimation for the Coefficients of Variation of Birnbaum–Saunders Distributions
title_full Bayesian Estimation for the Coefficients of Variation of Birnbaum–Saunders Distributions
title_fullStr Bayesian Estimation for the Coefficients of Variation of Birnbaum–Saunders Distributions
title_full_unstemmed Bayesian Estimation for the Coefficients of Variation of Birnbaum–Saunders Distributions
title_sort bayesian estimation for the coefficients of variation of birnbaum–saunders distributions
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/e4731014e9994b12b392d3a117d3a0d9
work_keys_str_mv AT wisuneepuggard bayesianestimationforthecoefficientsofvariationofbirnbaumsaundersdistributions
AT saaatniwitpong bayesianestimationforthecoefficientsofvariationofbirnbaumsaundersdistributions
AT suparatniwitpong bayesianestimationforthecoefficientsofvariationofbirnbaumsaundersdistributions
_version_ 1718410312031404032