Assessing and mapping multi-hazard risk susceptibility using a machine learning technique

Abstract The aim of the current study was to suggest a multi-hazard probability assessment in Fars Province, Shiraz City, and its four strategic watersheds. At first, we construct maps depicting the most effective factors on floods (12 factors), forest fires (10 factors), and landslides (10 factors)...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamid Reza Pourghasemi, Narges Kariminejad, Mahdis Amiri, Mohsen Edalat, Mehrdad Zarafshar, Thomas Blaschke, Artemio Cerda
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2020
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e49a5dfb79724dd68433a0e3aa2570e7
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e49a5dfb79724dd68433a0e3aa2570e7
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e49a5dfb79724dd68433a0e3aa2570e72021-12-02T14:22:00ZAssessing and mapping multi-hazard risk susceptibility using a machine learning technique10.1038/s41598-020-60191-32045-2322https://doaj.org/article/e49a5dfb79724dd68433a0e3aa2570e72020-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60191-3https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The aim of the current study was to suggest a multi-hazard probability assessment in Fars Province, Shiraz City, and its four strategic watersheds. At first, we construct maps depicting the most effective factors on floods (12 factors), forest fires (10 factors), and landslides (10 factors), and used the Boruta algorithm to prioritize the impact of each respective factor on the occurrence of each hazard. Subsequently, flood, landslides, and forest fire susceptibility maps prepared using a Random Forest (RF) model in the R statistical software. Results indicate that 42.83% of the study area are not susceptible to any hazards, while 2.67% of the area is at risk of all three hazards. The results of the multi-hazard map in Shiraz City indicate that 25% of Shiraz city is very susceptible to flooding, while 16% is very susceptible to landslide occurrences. For four strategic watersheds, it is notable that in the Dorodzan Watershed, landslides and floods are the most important hazards; whereas, flood occurrences cover the largest area of the Maharlou Watershed. In contrast, the Tashk-Bakhtegan Watershed is so sensible to floods and landslides, respectively. Finally, in the Ghareaghaj Watershed, forest fire ranks as the strongest hazard, followed by floods. The validation results indicate an AUC of 0.834, 0.939, and 0.943 for the flood, landslide, and forest fire susceptibility maps, respectively. Also, other accuracy measures including, specificity, sensitivity, TSS, CCI, and Gini coefficient confirmed results of the AUC values. These results allow us to forecast the spatial behavior of such multi-hazard events, and researchers and stakeholders alike can apply them to evaluate hazards under various mitigation scenarios.Hamid Reza PourghasemiNarges KariminejadMahdis AmiriMohsen EdalatMehrdad ZarafsharThomas BlaschkeArtemio CerdaNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Hamid Reza Pourghasemi
Narges Kariminejad
Mahdis Amiri
Mohsen Edalat
Mehrdad Zarafshar
Thomas Blaschke
Artemio Cerda
Assessing and mapping multi-hazard risk susceptibility using a machine learning technique
description Abstract The aim of the current study was to suggest a multi-hazard probability assessment in Fars Province, Shiraz City, and its four strategic watersheds. At first, we construct maps depicting the most effective factors on floods (12 factors), forest fires (10 factors), and landslides (10 factors), and used the Boruta algorithm to prioritize the impact of each respective factor on the occurrence of each hazard. Subsequently, flood, landslides, and forest fire susceptibility maps prepared using a Random Forest (RF) model in the R statistical software. Results indicate that 42.83% of the study area are not susceptible to any hazards, while 2.67% of the area is at risk of all three hazards. The results of the multi-hazard map in Shiraz City indicate that 25% of Shiraz city is very susceptible to flooding, while 16% is very susceptible to landslide occurrences. For four strategic watersheds, it is notable that in the Dorodzan Watershed, landslides and floods are the most important hazards; whereas, flood occurrences cover the largest area of the Maharlou Watershed. In contrast, the Tashk-Bakhtegan Watershed is so sensible to floods and landslides, respectively. Finally, in the Ghareaghaj Watershed, forest fire ranks as the strongest hazard, followed by floods. The validation results indicate an AUC of 0.834, 0.939, and 0.943 for the flood, landslide, and forest fire susceptibility maps, respectively. Also, other accuracy measures including, specificity, sensitivity, TSS, CCI, and Gini coefficient confirmed results of the AUC values. These results allow us to forecast the spatial behavior of such multi-hazard events, and researchers and stakeholders alike can apply them to evaluate hazards under various mitigation scenarios.
format article
author Hamid Reza Pourghasemi
Narges Kariminejad
Mahdis Amiri
Mohsen Edalat
Mehrdad Zarafshar
Thomas Blaschke
Artemio Cerda
author_facet Hamid Reza Pourghasemi
Narges Kariminejad
Mahdis Amiri
Mohsen Edalat
Mehrdad Zarafshar
Thomas Blaschke
Artemio Cerda
author_sort Hamid Reza Pourghasemi
title Assessing and mapping multi-hazard risk susceptibility using a machine learning technique
title_short Assessing and mapping multi-hazard risk susceptibility using a machine learning technique
title_full Assessing and mapping multi-hazard risk susceptibility using a machine learning technique
title_fullStr Assessing and mapping multi-hazard risk susceptibility using a machine learning technique
title_full_unstemmed Assessing and mapping multi-hazard risk susceptibility using a machine learning technique
title_sort assessing and mapping multi-hazard risk susceptibility using a machine learning technique
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/e49a5dfb79724dd68433a0e3aa2570e7
work_keys_str_mv AT hamidrezapourghasemi assessingandmappingmultihazardrisksusceptibilityusingamachinelearningtechnique
AT nargeskariminejad assessingandmappingmultihazardrisksusceptibilityusingamachinelearningtechnique
AT mahdisamiri assessingandmappingmultihazardrisksusceptibilityusingamachinelearningtechnique
AT mohsenedalat assessingandmappingmultihazardrisksusceptibilityusingamachinelearningtechnique
AT mehrdadzarafshar assessingandmappingmultihazardrisksusceptibilityusingamachinelearningtechnique
AT thomasblaschke assessingandmappingmultihazardrisksusceptibilityusingamachinelearningtechnique
AT artemiocerda assessingandmappingmultihazardrisksusceptibilityusingamachinelearningtechnique
_version_ 1718391521635467264