Potential impact of a nonavalent anti HPV vaccine in Italian men with and without clinical manifestations

Abstract Human papilloma virus infection (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted disease. Little is known about male infection. Nonavalent vaccine against types 6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58 was approved and neutral gender immunization programs have been proposed. This study evaluates the potentia...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liana Bosco, Nicola Serra, Teresa Fasciana, Daniela Pistoia, Marco Vella, Leonardo Di Gregorio, Rosaria Schillaci, Antonino Perino, Gloria Calagna, Alberto Firenze, Giuseppina Capra
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e55593e95e4c4b55874483f88980e030
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e55593e95e4c4b55874483f88980e030
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e55593e95e4c4b55874483f88980e0302021-12-02T12:11:06ZPotential impact of a nonavalent anti HPV vaccine in Italian men with and without clinical manifestations10.1038/s41598-021-83639-62045-2322https://doaj.org/article/e55593e95e4c4b55874483f88980e0302021-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83639-6https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Human papilloma virus infection (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted disease. Little is known about male infection. Nonavalent vaccine against types 6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58 was approved and neutral gender immunization programs have been proposed. This study evaluates the potential impact of nonavalent vaccine compared to quadrivalent in male living in Sicily (Italy). 58.7% of samples were HPV positive and forty-four types of HPV were identified. A significant higher estimated coverage of nonavalent vaccine than quadrivalent was observed (64.3% vs. 45.8%), with absolute and relative additional impact of 20.1% and 47.2%, respectively. Low impact of the vaccine were calculated as the empirical probability of HPV genotypes 6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58 alone or in combination; the high impact as empirical probability of HPV6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58 genotypes alone or in association with other genotypes. The potential impact of the nonavalent vaccine vs quadrivalent was significant for low and high impact (29.7% > 18:8%; 34:6% > 26.6%, respectively). Particularly, in men with lesions and risky sexual contact was significant only for low impact (35.5% > 29.7%; 31.4% > 19.7%, respectively). In partners with positive females was significant for low impact (26.3% > 15.1%) and high impact (33.7% > 23.2%). Nonavalent vaccine offers broader protection in men with HPV positive partners, who would have a potential role in the transmission of the infection.Liana BoscoNicola SerraTeresa FascianaDaniela PistoiaMarco VellaLeonardo Di GregorioRosaria SchillaciAntonino PerinoGloria CalagnaAlberto FirenzeGiuseppina CapraNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Liana Bosco
Nicola Serra
Teresa Fasciana
Daniela Pistoia
Marco Vella
Leonardo Di Gregorio
Rosaria Schillaci
Antonino Perino
Gloria Calagna
Alberto Firenze
Giuseppina Capra
Potential impact of a nonavalent anti HPV vaccine in Italian men with and without clinical manifestations
description Abstract Human papilloma virus infection (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted disease. Little is known about male infection. Nonavalent vaccine against types 6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58 was approved and neutral gender immunization programs have been proposed. This study evaluates the potential impact of nonavalent vaccine compared to quadrivalent in male living in Sicily (Italy). 58.7% of samples were HPV positive and forty-four types of HPV were identified. A significant higher estimated coverage of nonavalent vaccine than quadrivalent was observed (64.3% vs. 45.8%), with absolute and relative additional impact of 20.1% and 47.2%, respectively. Low impact of the vaccine were calculated as the empirical probability of HPV genotypes 6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58 alone or in combination; the high impact as empirical probability of HPV6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58 genotypes alone or in association with other genotypes. The potential impact of the nonavalent vaccine vs quadrivalent was significant for low and high impact (29.7% > 18:8%; 34:6% > 26.6%, respectively). Particularly, in men with lesions and risky sexual contact was significant only for low impact (35.5% > 29.7%; 31.4% > 19.7%, respectively). In partners with positive females was significant for low impact (26.3% > 15.1%) and high impact (33.7% > 23.2%). Nonavalent vaccine offers broader protection in men with HPV positive partners, who would have a potential role in the transmission of the infection.
format article
author Liana Bosco
Nicola Serra
Teresa Fasciana
Daniela Pistoia
Marco Vella
Leonardo Di Gregorio
Rosaria Schillaci
Antonino Perino
Gloria Calagna
Alberto Firenze
Giuseppina Capra
author_facet Liana Bosco
Nicola Serra
Teresa Fasciana
Daniela Pistoia
Marco Vella
Leonardo Di Gregorio
Rosaria Schillaci
Antonino Perino
Gloria Calagna
Alberto Firenze
Giuseppina Capra
author_sort Liana Bosco
title Potential impact of a nonavalent anti HPV vaccine in Italian men with and without clinical manifestations
title_short Potential impact of a nonavalent anti HPV vaccine in Italian men with and without clinical manifestations
title_full Potential impact of a nonavalent anti HPV vaccine in Italian men with and without clinical manifestations
title_fullStr Potential impact of a nonavalent anti HPV vaccine in Italian men with and without clinical manifestations
title_full_unstemmed Potential impact of a nonavalent anti HPV vaccine in Italian men with and without clinical manifestations
title_sort potential impact of a nonavalent anti hpv vaccine in italian men with and without clinical manifestations
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/e55593e95e4c4b55874483f88980e030
work_keys_str_mv AT lianabosco potentialimpactofanonavalentantihpvvaccineinitalianmenwithandwithoutclinicalmanifestations
AT nicolaserra potentialimpactofanonavalentantihpvvaccineinitalianmenwithandwithoutclinicalmanifestations
AT teresafasciana potentialimpactofanonavalentantihpvvaccineinitalianmenwithandwithoutclinicalmanifestations
AT danielapistoia potentialimpactofanonavalentantihpvvaccineinitalianmenwithandwithoutclinicalmanifestations
AT marcovella potentialimpactofanonavalentantihpvvaccineinitalianmenwithandwithoutclinicalmanifestations
AT leonardodigregorio potentialimpactofanonavalentantihpvvaccineinitalianmenwithandwithoutclinicalmanifestations
AT rosariaschillaci potentialimpactofanonavalentantihpvvaccineinitalianmenwithandwithoutclinicalmanifestations
AT antoninoperino potentialimpactofanonavalentantihpvvaccineinitalianmenwithandwithoutclinicalmanifestations
AT gloriacalagna potentialimpactofanonavalentantihpvvaccineinitalianmenwithandwithoutclinicalmanifestations
AT albertofirenze potentialimpactofanonavalentantihpvvaccineinitalianmenwithandwithoutclinicalmanifestations
AT giuseppinacapra potentialimpactofanonavalentantihpvvaccineinitalianmenwithandwithoutclinicalmanifestations
_version_ 1718394663552942080