Concepts of the body and personhood in the Mesolithic-Neolithic Danube Gorges: interpreting animal remains from human burials

In recent years, humanities have brought forward the idea of non-human agency; either in the form of meanings bestowed upon objects, animals and natural phenomena, or through deconstruction of ontological differences between ‘people’ and ‘things’. In case of the former, it has been argued that non-h...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ivana Živaljević
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FR
SR
Publicado: University of Belgrade 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e5711c7216b941aca298e48d34e31144
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e5711c7216b941aca298e48d34e31144
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e5711c7216b941aca298e48d34e311442021-12-02T01:27:29ZConcepts of the body and personhood in the Mesolithic-Neolithic Danube Gorges: interpreting animal remains from human burials0353-15892334-8801https://doaj.org/article/e5711c7216b941aca298e48d34e311442016-02-01T00:00:00Zhttp://eap-iea.org/index.php/eap/article/view/266https://doaj.org/toc/0353-1589https://doaj.org/toc/2334-8801In recent years, humanities have brought forward the idea of non-human agency; either in the form of meanings bestowed upon objects, animals and natural phenomena, or through deconstruction of ontological differences between ‘people’ and ‘things’. In case of the former, it has been argued that non-human agents have the power to act as ‘participants’ in social action (e.g. the agentive power of material properties of things, or of animal behaviour). In this paper, I discuss the practice of placing animal body parts alongside human bodies in the Mesolithic-Neolithic Danube Gorges, by using the concept of perspectivism as a theoretical framework. The choice of species and their body parts varied, but was by no means accidental. Rather, it reflected certain culturally specific taxonomies, which were based on animal properties: how they look, move, feel or what they do. Common examples include red deer antlers, which have the power to ‘regenerate’ each year, or dog mandibles (physical remains of ‘mouths’) which have the power to ‘communicate’ (i.e. bark). The aim of the paper is to explore how various aspects of animal corporeality, associated with certain ways of seeing and experiencing the world, could be ‘borrowed’ by humans utilizing animal body parts.Ivana ŽivaljevićUniversity of Belgradearticleanimal agency, personhood, embodiment, perspectivism, Mesolithic- Neolithic, Danube Gorges, Lepenski Vir, Vlasac, human-animal relations, burialsAnthropologyGN1-890ENFRSREtnoantropološki Problemi, Vol 10, Iss 3, Pp 675-699 (2016)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FR
SR
topic animal agency, personhood, embodiment, perspectivism, Mesolithic- Neolithic, Danube Gorges, Lepenski Vir, Vlasac, human-animal relations, burials
Anthropology
GN1-890
spellingShingle animal agency, personhood, embodiment, perspectivism, Mesolithic- Neolithic, Danube Gorges, Lepenski Vir, Vlasac, human-animal relations, burials
Anthropology
GN1-890
Ivana Živaljević
Concepts of the body and personhood in the Mesolithic-Neolithic Danube Gorges: interpreting animal remains from human burials
description In recent years, humanities have brought forward the idea of non-human agency; either in the form of meanings bestowed upon objects, animals and natural phenomena, or through deconstruction of ontological differences between ‘people’ and ‘things’. In case of the former, it has been argued that non-human agents have the power to act as ‘participants’ in social action (e.g. the agentive power of material properties of things, or of animal behaviour). In this paper, I discuss the practice of placing animal body parts alongside human bodies in the Mesolithic-Neolithic Danube Gorges, by using the concept of perspectivism as a theoretical framework. The choice of species and their body parts varied, but was by no means accidental. Rather, it reflected certain culturally specific taxonomies, which were based on animal properties: how they look, move, feel or what they do. Common examples include red deer antlers, which have the power to ‘regenerate’ each year, or dog mandibles (physical remains of ‘mouths’) which have the power to ‘communicate’ (i.e. bark). The aim of the paper is to explore how various aspects of animal corporeality, associated with certain ways of seeing and experiencing the world, could be ‘borrowed’ by humans utilizing animal body parts.
format article
author Ivana Živaljević
author_facet Ivana Živaljević
author_sort Ivana Živaljević
title Concepts of the body and personhood in the Mesolithic-Neolithic Danube Gorges: interpreting animal remains from human burials
title_short Concepts of the body and personhood in the Mesolithic-Neolithic Danube Gorges: interpreting animal remains from human burials
title_full Concepts of the body and personhood in the Mesolithic-Neolithic Danube Gorges: interpreting animal remains from human burials
title_fullStr Concepts of the body and personhood in the Mesolithic-Neolithic Danube Gorges: interpreting animal remains from human burials
title_full_unstemmed Concepts of the body and personhood in the Mesolithic-Neolithic Danube Gorges: interpreting animal remains from human burials
title_sort concepts of the body and personhood in the mesolithic-neolithic danube gorges: interpreting animal remains from human burials
publisher University of Belgrade
publishDate 2016
url https://doaj.org/article/e5711c7216b941aca298e48d34e31144
work_keys_str_mv AT ivanazivaljevic conceptsofthebodyandpersonhoodinthemesolithicneolithicdanubegorgesinterpretinganimalremainsfromhumanburials
_version_ 1718403106997272576