The Trinity: Prototype of Real Existence or Danger to Political Wellbeing? Tanner, Volf, and Yannaras in Conversation
Kathryn Tanner maintains that political theologies based on the Trinity are not only unsound, but potentially dangerous. Her primary concern is that the Trinity, by definition, cannot serve as a “model” for human socio-political organization. Miroslav Volf, while sharing Tanner’s sense that Trinitar...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/e57314d47e974e379a9f92ba1b64b605 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:e57314d47e974e379a9f92ba1b64b605 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:e57314d47e974e379a9f92ba1b64b6052021-11-25T18:53:13ZThe Trinity: Prototype of Real Existence or Danger to Political Wellbeing? Tanner, Volf, and Yannaras in Conversation10.3390/rel121109982077-1444https://doaj.org/article/e57314d47e974e379a9f92ba1b64b6052021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/11/998https://doaj.org/toc/2077-1444Kathryn Tanner maintains that political theologies based on the Trinity are not only unsound, but potentially dangerous. Her primary concern is that the Trinity, by definition, cannot serve as a “model” for human socio-political organization. Miroslav Volf, while sharing Tanner’s sense that Trinitarian political theologies are fraught, nevertheless, maintains that the Trinity can serve as a “vision” for human socio-political relations, albeit not as a “program”. This article brings Tanner and Volf into conversation with Eastern Orthodox philosopher-theologian Christos Yannaras, whose Trinitarian political theology regards the Trinity as the “prototype” or “archetype” of a mode of existence in which humans can participate by transcending their natures, with the aim of realizing truth. This article argues that Yannaras offers a novel way of conceptualizing Trinitarian political theology which escapes Tanner and Volf’s criticisms, on the one hand, and offers Social Trinitarianism a fresh and fertile perspective that could advance its discourse.Jonathan ColeMDPI AGarticleKathryn TannerMiroslav VolfChristos YannarasTrinitypolitical theologyexistenceReligions. Mythology. RationalismBL1-2790ENReligions, Vol 12, Iss 998, p 998 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Kathryn Tanner Miroslav Volf Christos Yannaras Trinity political theology existence Religions. Mythology. Rationalism BL1-2790 |
spellingShingle |
Kathryn Tanner Miroslav Volf Christos Yannaras Trinity political theology existence Religions. Mythology. Rationalism BL1-2790 Jonathan Cole The Trinity: Prototype of Real Existence or Danger to Political Wellbeing? Tanner, Volf, and Yannaras in Conversation |
description |
Kathryn Tanner maintains that political theologies based on the Trinity are not only unsound, but potentially dangerous. Her primary concern is that the Trinity, by definition, cannot serve as a “model” for human socio-political organization. Miroslav Volf, while sharing Tanner’s sense that Trinitarian political theologies are fraught, nevertheless, maintains that the Trinity can serve as a “vision” for human socio-political relations, albeit not as a “program”. This article brings Tanner and Volf into conversation with Eastern Orthodox philosopher-theologian Christos Yannaras, whose Trinitarian political theology regards the Trinity as the “prototype” or “archetype” of a mode of existence in which humans can participate by transcending their natures, with the aim of realizing truth. This article argues that Yannaras offers a novel way of conceptualizing Trinitarian political theology which escapes Tanner and Volf’s criticisms, on the one hand, and offers Social Trinitarianism a fresh and fertile perspective that could advance its discourse. |
format |
article |
author |
Jonathan Cole |
author_facet |
Jonathan Cole |
author_sort |
Jonathan Cole |
title |
The Trinity: Prototype of Real Existence or Danger to Political Wellbeing? Tanner, Volf, and Yannaras in Conversation |
title_short |
The Trinity: Prototype of Real Existence or Danger to Political Wellbeing? Tanner, Volf, and Yannaras in Conversation |
title_full |
The Trinity: Prototype of Real Existence or Danger to Political Wellbeing? Tanner, Volf, and Yannaras in Conversation |
title_fullStr |
The Trinity: Prototype of Real Existence or Danger to Political Wellbeing? Tanner, Volf, and Yannaras in Conversation |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Trinity: Prototype of Real Existence or Danger to Political Wellbeing? Tanner, Volf, and Yannaras in Conversation |
title_sort |
trinity: prototype of real existence or danger to political wellbeing? tanner, volf, and yannaras in conversation |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/e57314d47e974e379a9f92ba1b64b605 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jonathancole thetrinityprototypeofrealexistenceordangertopoliticalwellbeingtannervolfandyannarasinconversation AT jonathancole trinityprototypeofrealexistenceordangertopoliticalwellbeingtannervolfandyannarasinconversation |
_version_ |
1718410624853082112 |