Intrasound therapy in tendon healing: is intensity a factor?

AI Aiyegbusi1, FIO Duru1, SR Akinbo2, CC Noronha1, AO Okanlawon11Departments of Anatomy and 2Physiotherapy, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, NigeriaObjective: This study investigated the effects of low- and high-intensity intrasound therapy (LITR and HITR, respectively) given once da...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: AI Aiyegbusi, FIO Duru, SR Akinbo, et al
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e585827ee4dc48ec81e57cc457810feb
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e585827ee4dc48ec81e57cc457810feb
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e585827ee4dc48ec81e57cc457810feb2021-12-02T01:14:42ZIntrasound therapy in tendon healing: is intensity a factor?1179-156Xhttps://doaj.org/article/e585827ee4dc48ec81e57cc457810feb2010-08-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/intrasound-therapy-in-tendon-healing-is-intensity-a-factor-a5029https://doaj.org/toc/1179-156XAI Aiyegbusi1, FIO Duru1, SR Akinbo2, CC Noronha1, AO Okanlawon11Departments of Anatomy and 2Physiotherapy, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, NigeriaObjective: This study investigated the effects of low- and high-intensity intrasound therapy (LITR and HITR, respectively) given once daily and twice daily on the morphology and ­oxidative stress in healing tendon tissue following an acute injury.Methods: Eighty-five male rats, randomized into six groups were further subdivided into groups A, B, and C, except for Group 1 which was subdivided into A and B only. Groups 2–6 underwent an induced crush injury. The six groups were allocated to: serve as controls (Group 1), receive no treatment (Group 2), HITR twice daily (Group 3), HITR once daily (Group 4), LITR twice daily (Group 5), and LITR once daily (Group 6). Intrasound therapy (ITR) was commenced 24 hours postinjury and was given once daily or twice daily over the first 14 days postinjury. The animals in subgroups A and B were sacrificed on day 15 postinjury, and those in subgroup C were sacrificed on day 31 postinjury. The tendons were excised, and processed for histology and malondialdehyde (MDA) assay.Results: There was no significant difference in the tenocyte population between the HITR- and LITR-treated groups. However, twice-daily treatment in either the low- or high-intensity mode resulted in significant tenocyte proliferation compared with the once-daily treated groups, and also had the highest percentage of tenoblasts compared with the population of tenocytes in the proliferative phase of healing. All treatment protocols marginally lowered the MDA level.Conclusion: The role of IRT in tendon healing is influenced more by the frequency of treatment rather than the intensity of the delivered dosage.Keywords: intrasound therapy, tenoblast, tenocytes, tendon injury, crush injury, oxidative stress, malondialdehyde, tenoblast proliferation. AI AiyegbusiFIO DuruSR Akinboet alDove Medical PressarticleDiseases of the musculoskeletal systemRC925-935ENOpen Access Rheumatology: Research and Reviews, Vol 2010, Iss default, Pp 45-52 (2010)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Diseases of the musculoskeletal system
RC925-935
spellingShingle Diseases of the musculoskeletal system
RC925-935
AI Aiyegbusi
FIO Duru
SR Akinbo
et al
Intrasound therapy in tendon healing: is intensity a factor?
description AI Aiyegbusi1, FIO Duru1, SR Akinbo2, CC Noronha1, AO Okanlawon11Departments of Anatomy and 2Physiotherapy, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, NigeriaObjective: This study investigated the effects of low- and high-intensity intrasound therapy (LITR and HITR, respectively) given once daily and twice daily on the morphology and ­oxidative stress in healing tendon tissue following an acute injury.Methods: Eighty-five male rats, randomized into six groups were further subdivided into groups A, B, and C, except for Group 1 which was subdivided into A and B only. Groups 2–6 underwent an induced crush injury. The six groups were allocated to: serve as controls (Group 1), receive no treatment (Group 2), HITR twice daily (Group 3), HITR once daily (Group 4), LITR twice daily (Group 5), and LITR once daily (Group 6). Intrasound therapy (ITR) was commenced 24 hours postinjury and was given once daily or twice daily over the first 14 days postinjury. The animals in subgroups A and B were sacrificed on day 15 postinjury, and those in subgroup C were sacrificed on day 31 postinjury. The tendons were excised, and processed for histology and malondialdehyde (MDA) assay.Results: There was no significant difference in the tenocyte population between the HITR- and LITR-treated groups. However, twice-daily treatment in either the low- or high-intensity mode resulted in significant tenocyte proliferation compared with the once-daily treated groups, and also had the highest percentage of tenoblasts compared with the population of tenocytes in the proliferative phase of healing. All treatment protocols marginally lowered the MDA level.Conclusion: The role of IRT in tendon healing is influenced more by the frequency of treatment rather than the intensity of the delivered dosage.Keywords: intrasound therapy, tenoblast, tenocytes, tendon injury, crush injury, oxidative stress, malondialdehyde, tenoblast proliferation.
format article
author AI Aiyegbusi
FIO Duru
SR Akinbo
et al
author_facet AI Aiyegbusi
FIO Duru
SR Akinbo
et al
author_sort AI Aiyegbusi
title Intrasound therapy in tendon healing: is intensity a factor?
title_short Intrasound therapy in tendon healing: is intensity a factor?
title_full Intrasound therapy in tendon healing: is intensity a factor?
title_fullStr Intrasound therapy in tendon healing: is intensity a factor?
title_full_unstemmed Intrasound therapy in tendon healing: is intensity a factor?
title_sort intrasound therapy in tendon healing: is intensity a factor?
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2010
url https://doaj.org/article/e585827ee4dc48ec81e57cc457810feb
work_keys_str_mv AT aiaiyegbusi intrasoundtherapyintendonhealingisintensityafactor
AT fioduru intrasoundtherapyintendonhealingisintensityafactor
AT srakinbo intrasoundtherapyintendonhealingisintensityafactor
AT etal intrasoundtherapyintendonhealingisintensityafactor
_version_ 1718403228908912640