Will the EU Taxonomy Regulation Foster Sustainable Corporate Governance?
EU securities regulation has established a taxonomy of environmentally sustainable activities. This article discusses, from a law and economics standpoint, the potential of this taxonomy to support sustainable corporate governance. Corporate governance can be an efficient way to channel investor pre...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/e5a78aa04d6340f794da60a920bf93d5 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:e5a78aa04d6340f794da60a920bf93d5 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:e5a78aa04d6340f794da60a920bf93d52021-11-11T19:51:20ZWill the EU Taxonomy Regulation Foster Sustainable Corporate Governance?10.3390/su1321123162071-1050https://doaj.org/article/e5a78aa04d6340f794da60a920bf93d52021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12316https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050EU securities regulation has established a taxonomy of environmentally sustainable activities. This article discusses, from a law and economics standpoint, the potential of this taxonomy to support sustainable corporate governance. Corporate governance can be an efficient way to channel investor preferences towards sustainability because the concentration of institutional shareholding has lowered the transaction costs of shareholder action. However, there is a principal-agent problem between institutional investors and their beneficiaries, which depends on greenwashing and undermines sustainable corporate governance. This article argues that introducing environmental sustainability into EU mandatory disclosure aligns the institutional investors’ incentives with the interest of their beneficiaries and may foster the efficient inclusion of sustainability in corporate governance. The argument is threefold. Firstly, the EU Taxonomy may curb greenwashing by standardizing the disclosure of environmental sustainability. Secondly, this information may become salient for the beneficiaries as the same standards define the sustainability preferences to be considered in recommending and marketing financial products. Thirdly, sustainability disclosure prompts institutional investors to compete for sustainability-minded beneficiaries. Being unable to avoid unsustainable companies altogether, institutional investors are expected to cater to beneficiaries’ preferences for environmental sustainability using voice instead of exit.Alessio M. PaccesMDPI AGarticleenvironmental sustainabilitylaw and economicssecurities regulationcorporate governanceinstitutional investorsgreenwashingEnvironmental effects of industries and plantsTD194-195Renewable energy sourcesTJ807-830Environmental sciencesGE1-350ENSustainability, Vol 13, Iss 12316, p 12316 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
environmental sustainability law and economics securities regulation corporate governance institutional investors greenwashing Environmental effects of industries and plants TD194-195 Renewable energy sources TJ807-830 Environmental sciences GE1-350 |
spellingShingle |
environmental sustainability law and economics securities regulation corporate governance institutional investors greenwashing Environmental effects of industries and plants TD194-195 Renewable energy sources TJ807-830 Environmental sciences GE1-350 Alessio M. Pacces Will the EU Taxonomy Regulation Foster Sustainable Corporate Governance? |
description |
EU securities regulation has established a taxonomy of environmentally sustainable activities. This article discusses, from a law and economics standpoint, the potential of this taxonomy to support sustainable corporate governance. Corporate governance can be an efficient way to channel investor preferences towards sustainability because the concentration of institutional shareholding has lowered the transaction costs of shareholder action. However, there is a principal-agent problem between institutional investors and their beneficiaries, which depends on greenwashing and undermines sustainable corporate governance. This article argues that introducing environmental sustainability into EU mandatory disclosure aligns the institutional investors’ incentives with the interest of their beneficiaries and may foster the efficient inclusion of sustainability in corporate governance. The argument is threefold. Firstly, the EU Taxonomy may curb greenwashing by standardizing the disclosure of environmental sustainability. Secondly, this information may become salient for the beneficiaries as the same standards define the sustainability preferences to be considered in recommending and marketing financial products. Thirdly, sustainability disclosure prompts institutional investors to compete for sustainability-minded beneficiaries. Being unable to avoid unsustainable companies altogether, institutional investors are expected to cater to beneficiaries’ preferences for environmental sustainability using voice instead of exit. |
format |
article |
author |
Alessio M. Pacces |
author_facet |
Alessio M. Pacces |
author_sort |
Alessio M. Pacces |
title |
Will the EU Taxonomy Regulation Foster Sustainable Corporate Governance? |
title_short |
Will the EU Taxonomy Regulation Foster Sustainable Corporate Governance? |
title_full |
Will the EU Taxonomy Regulation Foster Sustainable Corporate Governance? |
title_fullStr |
Will the EU Taxonomy Regulation Foster Sustainable Corporate Governance? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Will the EU Taxonomy Regulation Foster Sustainable Corporate Governance? |
title_sort |
will the eu taxonomy regulation foster sustainable corporate governance? |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/e5a78aa04d6340f794da60a920bf93d5 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alessiompacces willtheeutaxonomyregulationfostersustainablecorporategovernance |
_version_ |
1718431441786765312 |