Political alternatives for constitutional democracy: between utopia, pandemic and dystopia

Perhaps there are never too many different theories about the organization of society, ideas about the normative framework of life in a political community and suggestions on how to institutionalize the political system. Perhaps they go out in public too early. This could also apply to those reflect...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Teršek Andraž
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	De Gruyter 2020
Materias:	constitutional democracy 2020 pandemic utopia political alternatives solidarity morality welfare state fundamental human rights and freedoms Political science J
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/e5b16a840acf4e469ce7b94477a01a4f
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:e5b16a840acf4e469ce7b94477a01a4f
record_format	dspace
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	constitutional democracy 2020 pandemic utopia political alternatives solidarity morality welfare state fundamental human rights and freedoms Political science J
spellingShingle	constitutional democracy 2020 pandemic utopia political alternatives solidarity morality welfare state fundamental human rights and freedoms Political science J Teršek Andraž Political alternatives for constitutional democracy: between utopia, pandemic and dystopia
description	Perhaps there are never too many different theories about the organization of society, ideas about the normative framework of life in a political community and suggestions on how to institutionalize the political system. Perhaps they go out in public too early. This could also apply to those reflections on society and to those political philosophies that bear the label of utopia. There is no doubt about the importance of such human investigations of what is and what should be. And there is no doubt about the usefulness of constantly imagining what it should be. However, analytical and explanatory caution is required when the word utopia is used to suggest the utopian nature of an idea. In other words, what looks like a utopia can already be presented to us as a provable and tangible fact, only that too many people do not perceive it for too long, and therefore it remains unfulfilled in social practice. Is this really a utopia? On the other hand, what may seem completely understandable, feasible or even self-evident can appear extremely utopian when it comes to the normative approaches to social regulation and the conditions for achieving a “better society.” The deviation of political practice and legal practice from what should be understandable or even self-evident according to the text of the constitution and international law, the findings of jurisprudence, philosophical insights and common sense in political decision-making and in the drafting and implementation of the applicable law is so great that, paradoxically, precisely that which is understandable, feasible or even self-evident appears utopian. And how can utopianism be combined with the realization that so many major and persistent social problems can be solved so easily and quickly - even if only by rethinking the legal system and social realm? How can a human being efficiently oppose neoliberal politics and unbridled capitalist practice, the poor functioning of the rule of law, the low quality of the welfare state, the excessive threat to fundamental human rights and freedoms, the inadequate protection of social rights, the insufficient commitment to the value of solidarity and the inadequate role and weakness of morality in social practice? Can the answers to fundamental social questions and solutions to the greatest problems only be found in a real and literal utopia? I do not believe so. I believe that communitarianism can be a good political alternative. Understood as social liberalism and as a social democracy based on the rule of law, morally founded on social solidarity as a fundamental value. I am convinced that the constitutions of the EU Member States and the EU legal order enable it. A strong and interventionist state is needed to realize the constitutional possibilities of a high-quality welfare state, effectively protected social rights, the realized social function of property and a society based on solidarity. Ideas are needed. Even if they seem so crazy, even if they seem utopian. In these times when the devil has taken the joke away, when people are again protesting massively in the streets, when they protest (unsuccessfully, of course), when it is difficult to know exactly what is happening and why, when more and more people are increasingly confused and frightened, when systemic violence increasingly turns into physical violence, when it is difficult to remain calm and thoughtful, when it is difficult to tame anger and rage..., it is necessary to step out of the existing coordinate system, out of the cube, to form and communicate ideas that seem crazy, utopian... Now, right now, ideas are needed, crazy ideas. We need a utopia. And faith and hope in it. Faith and hope, which will be the driving force of active action, of striving for realization – of a utopia.
format	article
author	Teršek Andraž
author_facet	Teršek Andraž
author_sort	Teršek Andraž
title	Political alternatives for constitutional democracy: between utopia, pandemic and dystopia
title_short	Political alternatives for constitutional democracy: between utopia, pandemic and dystopia
title_full	Political alternatives for constitutional democracy: between utopia, pandemic and dystopia
title_fullStr	Political alternatives for constitutional democracy: between utopia, pandemic and dystopia
title_full_unstemmed	Political alternatives for constitutional democracy: between utopia, pandemic and dystopia
title_sort	political alternatives for constitutional democracy: between utopia, pandemic and dystopia
publisher	De Gruyter
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/e5b16a840acf4e469ce7b94477a01a4f
work_keys_str_mv	AT tersekandraz politicalalternativesforconstitutionaldemocracybetweenutopiapandemicanddystopia
_version_	1718371510007103488
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:e5b16a840acf4e469ce7b94477a01a4f2021-12-05T14:11:00ZPolitical alternatives for constitutional democracy: between utopia, pandemic and dystopia2543-804210.1515/openps-2021-0006https://doaj.org/article/e5b16a840acf4e469ce7b94477a01a4f2020-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1515/openps-2021-0006https://doaj.org/toc/2543-8042Perhaps there are never too many different theories about the organization of society, ideas about the normative framework of life in a political community and suggestions on how to institutionalize the political system. Perhaps they go out in public too early. This could also apply to those reflections on society and to those political philosophies that bear the label of utopia. There is no doubt about the importance of such human investigations of what is and what should be. And there is no doubt about the usefulness of constantly imagining what it should be. However, analytical and explanatory caution is required when the word utopia is used to suggest the utopian nature of an idea. In other words, what looks like a utopia can already be presented to us as a provable and tangible fact, only that too many people do not perceive it for too long, and therefore it remains unfulfilled in social practice. Is this really a utopia? On the other hand, what may seem completely understandable, feasible or even self-evident can appear extremely utopian when it comes to the normative approaches to social regulation and the conditions for achieving a “better society.” The deviation of political practice and legal practice from what should be understandable or even self-evident according to the text of the constitution and international law, the findings of jurisprudence, philosophical insights and common sense in political decision-making and in the drafting and implementation of the applicable law is so great that, paradoxically, precisely that which is understandable, feasible or even self-evident appears utopian. And how can utopianism be combined with the realization that so many major and persistent social problems can be solved so easily and quickly - even if only by rethinking the legal system and social realm? How can a human being efficiently oppose neoliberal politics and unbridled capitalist practice, the poor functioning of the rule of law, the low quality of the welfare state, the excessive threat to fundamental human rights and freedoms, the inadequate protection of social rights, the insufficient commitment to the value of solidarity and the inadequate role and weakness of morality in social practice? Can the answers to fundamental social questions and solutions to the greatest problems only be found in a real and literal utopia? I do not believe so. I believe that communitarianism can be a good political alternative. Understood as social liberalism and as a social democracy based on the rule of law, morally founded on social solidarity as a fundamental value. I am convinced that the constitutions of the EU Member States and the EU legal order enable it. A strong and interventionist state is needed to realize the constitutional possibilities of a high-quality welfare state, effectively protected social rights, the realized social function of property and a society based on solidarity. Ideas are needed. Even if they seem so crazy, even if they seem utopian. In these times when the devil has taken the joke away, when people are again protesting massively in the streets, when they protest (unsuccessfully, of course), when it is difficult to know exactly what is happening and why, when more and more people are increasingly confused and frightened, when systemic violence increasingly turns into physical violence, when it is difficult to remain calm and thoughtful, when it is difficult to tame anger and rage..., it is necessary to step out of the existing coordinate system, out of the cube, to form and communicate ideas that seem crazy, utopian... Now, right now, ideas are needed, crazy ideas. We need a utopia. And faith and hope in it. Faith and hope, which will be the driving force of active action, of striving for realization – of a utopia.Teršek AndražDe Gruyterarticleconstitutional democracy2020 pandemicutopiapolitical alternativessolidaritymoralitywelfare statefundamental human rights and freedomsPolitical scienceJENOpen Political Science, Vol 4, Iss 1, Pp 45-63 (2020)

Political alternatives for constitutional democracy: between utopia, pandemic and dystopia

Ejemplares similares