La dissonnance dans le dissensus : manifestations et conséquences argumentatives d’une attaque psychologisante

The objective of this paper is to describe the argumentative use of the expression "cognitive dissonance" on the social network Twitter. The descriptive approach which is developped here aims to report on the use of this lexeme in the context of controversial exchanges. The specificity of...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Leslie Pison
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	FR
Publicado:	University of Tel-Aviv 2021
Materias:	ad hominem argumentation cognitive dissonance psychiatriation social networks Style. Composition. Rhetoric P301-301.5
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/e5b5f2689adc45a5b4687ee5d2e1f8e5
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:e5b5f2689adc45a5b4687ee5d2e1f8e5
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:e5b5f2689adc45a5b4687ee5d2e1f8e52021-12-02T09:54:28ZLa dissonnance dans le dissensus : manifestations et conséquences argumentatives d’une attaque psychologisante1565-896110.4000/aad.5820https://doaj.org/article/e5b5f2689adc45a5b4687ee5d2e1f8e52021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.openedition.org/aad/5820https://doaj.org/toc/1565-8961The objective of this paper is to describe the argumentative use of the expression "cognitive dissonance" on the social network Twitter. The descriptive approach which is developped here aims to report on the use of this lexeme in the context of controversial exchanges. The specificity of the expression "cognitive dissonance", contrary to other psychiatric attacks, lies in the fact that it is also a meta-argumentative criticism. Indeed, "cognitive dissonance" initially designates in cognitive sciences an incoherence between two elements perceived by the brain. The analyses carried out in this article, paying particular attention to counter-speech, show that this initial definition is reinvested during the argumentative use of "cognitive dissonance", which produces a double movement of refutation-disqualification. The argument by accusation of cognitive dissonance can therefore be assimilated to an ad hominem tu quoque.Leslie PisonUniversity of Tel-Avivarticlead hominemargumentationcognitive dissonancepsychiatriationsocial networksStyle. Composition. RhetoricP301-301.5FRArgumentation et Analyse du Discours, Vol 27 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	FR
topic	ad hominem argumentation cognitive dissonance psychiatriation social networks Style. Composition. Rhetoric P301-301.5
spellingShingle	ad hominem argumentation cognitive dissonance psychiatriation social networks Style. Composition. Rhetoric P301-301.5 Leslie Pison La dissonnance dans le dissensus : manifestations et conséquences argumentatives d’une attaque psychologisante
description	The objective of this paper is to describe the argumentative use of the expression "cognitive dissonance" on the social network Twitter. The descriptive approach which is developped here aims to report on the use of this lexeme in the context of controversial exchanges. The specificity of the expression "cognitive dissonance", contrary to other psychiatric attacks, lies in the fact that it is also a meta-argumentative criticism. Indeed, "cognitive dissonance" initially designates in cognitive sciences an incoherence between two elements perceived by the brain. The analyses carried out in this article, paying particular attention to counter-speech, show that this initial definition is reinvested during the argumentative use of "cognitive dissonance", which produces a double movement of refutation-disqualification. The argument by accusation of cognitive dissonance can therefore be assimilated to an ad hominem tu quoque.
format	article
author	Leslie Pison
author_facet	Leslie Pison
author_sort	Leslie Pison
title	La dissonnance dans le dissensus : manifestations et conséquences argumentatives d’une attaque psychologisante
title_short	La dissonnance dans le dissensus : manifestations et conséquences argumentatives d’une attaque psychologisante
title_full	La dissonnance dans le dissensus : manifestations et conséquences argumentatives d’une attaque psychologisante
title_fullStr	La dissonnance dans le dissensus : manifestations et conséquences argumentatives d’une attaque psychologisante
title_full_unstemmed	La dissonnance dans le dissensus : manifestations et conséquences argumentatives d’une attaque psychologisante
title_sort	la dissonnance dans le dissensus : manifestations et conséquences argumentatives d’une attaque psychologisante
publisher	University of Tel-Aviv
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/e5b5f2689adc45a5b4687ee5d2e1f8e5
work_keys_str_mv	AT lesliepison ladissonnancedansledissensusmanifestationsetconsequencesargumentativesduneattaquepsychologisante
_version_	1718397977975848960

La dissonnance dans le dissensus : manifestations et conséquences argumentatives d’une attaque psychologisante

Ejemplares similares