Vascular Hysteresis Loops and Vascular Architecture Mapping in Patients with Glioblastoma treated with Antiangiogenic Therapy

Abstract In this study, we investigated the variability of vascular hysteresis loop (VHL) shapes and the spatial heterogeneity of neovascularization and microvascular alterations using vascular architecture mapping (VAM) in patients with recurrent glioblastoma during bevacizumab mono-therapy. VAM da...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andreas Stadlbauer, Max Zimmermann, Stefan Oberndorfer, Arnd Doerfler, Michael Buchfelder, Gertraud Heinz, Karl Roessler
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e5e3aed873fa4895ac7c93816fd82751
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Abstract In this study, we investigated the variability of vascular hysteresis loop (VHL) shapes and the spatial heterogeneity of neovascularization and microvascular alterations using vascular architecture mapping (VAM) in patients with recurrent glioblastoma during bevacizumab mono-therapy. VAM data were acquired in 13 patients suffering from recurrent glioblastoma prior to and 3 months after bevacizumab treatment onset using a dual contrast agent injections approach as part of routine MRI. Two patients were additionally examined after the first cycle of bevacizumab to check for early treatment response. VHLs were evaluated as biomarker maps of neovascularization activity: microvessel type indicator (MTI) and curvature (Curv) of the VHL-long-axis. Early response to bevacizumab was dominated by reduction of smaller microvasculature (around 10 µm). In the 3-month follow-up, responding tumors additionally showed a reduction in larger microvasculature (>20 µm). VAM biomarker images revealed spatially heterogeneous microvascular alterations during bevacizumab treatment. Responding, non-responding, progressive, and remote-progressive tumor areas were observed. MTI may be useful to predict responding and non-responding tumor regions, and Curv to assess severity of vasogenic edema. Analysis of VHLs in combination with VAM biomarkers may lead to a new perspective on investigating the spatial heterogeneity of neovascularization and microvascular alterations in glioblastoma during antiangiogenic therapy.