The Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Endoscopic Transpapillary Interventions (Literature Review)

This article presents a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of endoscopic transpapillary management in patients with choledocholithiasis. The minimal complications are achieved using classical endoscopic papillosphincterotomy. However, in some cases, cannulation can be extremely difficult (ste...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Vyacheslav B. Rinchinov, Aleksandr N. Plekhanov
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	RU
Publicado:	Scientific Сentre for Family Health and Human Reproduction Problems 2019
Materias:	choledocholithiasis large papilla of the duodenum endoscopic papillosphincterotomy Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/e60a5f5d20ce48baa569c4a9590580f4
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:e60a5f5d20ce48baa569c4a9590580f4
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:e60a5f5d20ce48baa569c4a9590580f42021-11-23T06:14:42ZThe Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Endoscopic Transpapillary Interventions (Literature Review)2541-94202587-959610.29413/ABS.2019-4.1.18https://doaj.org/article/e60a5f5d20ce48baa569c4a9590580f42019-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.actabiomedica.ru/jour/article/view/1988https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9420https://doaj.org/toc/2587-9596This article presents a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of endoscopic transpapillary management in patients with choledocholithiasis. The minimal complications are achieved using classical endoscopic papillosphincterotomy. However, in some cases, cannulation can be extremely difficult (stenosis, tumor of the major duodenal papilla, the anatomical features of the major duodenal papilla) or even impossible (wedged stone), and the introduction of a guidewire into the pancreatic duct significantly increases the risk of developing postoperative pancreatitis. The desire to increase the success when performing endoscopic papillosphincterotomy with diagnostic purpose (to perform endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography after failure of traditional cannulation) and for the purpose of performing transpapillary operations has naturally led to the development of new non-standard methods of endoscopic papillotomy, the introduction of new instruments – wire guides and guided cannulas. Further increase in the frequency of successful endoscopic papillotomy can be facilitated by using atypical methods of surgery. Some authors show that classical papillosphincterotomy is comparable to the method of endoscopic papillosphincterotomy with balloon dilatation in effectiveness of extracting stones from the common bile duct. However, balloon dilatation in the extraction of choledocholithiasis is preferable due to fewer postoperative complications.The authors of this article note that endoscopic management do not always solve the problem of choledocholithiasis, but still have undeniable advantages compared with the laparotomy, in which choledocholithotomy sometimes has to be expanded, and duodenotomy with transduodenal papillosphincterotomy is conducted. Literature shows that main mortality causes after endoscopic interventions in patients with choledocholithiasis were progression of purulent cholangitis, biliary sepsis, acute postoperative pancreatitis, “discharge” syndrome.Vyacheslav B. RinchinovAleksandr N. PlekhanovScientific Сentre for Family Health and Human Reproduction Problemsarticlecholedocholithiasislarge papilla of the duodenumendoscopic papillosphincterotomyScienceQRUActa Biomedica Scientifica, Vol 4, Iss 1, Pp 120-123 (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	RU
topic	choledocholithiasis large papilla of the duodenum endoscopic papillosphincterotomy Science Q
spellingShingle	choledocholithiasis large papilla of the duodenum endoscopic papillosphincterotomy Science Q Vyacheslav B. Rinchinov Aleksandr N. Plekhanov The Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Endoscopic Transpapillary Interventions (Literature Review)
description	This article presents a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of endoscopic transpapillary management in patients with choledocholithiasis. The minimal complications are achieved using classical endoscopic papillosphincterotomy. However, in some cases, cannulation can be extremely difficult (stenosis, tumor of the major duodenal papilla, the anatomical features of the major duodenal papilla) or even impossible (wedged stone), and the introduction of a guidewire into the pancreatic duct significantly increases the risk of developing postoperative pancreatitis. The desire to increase the success when performing endoscopic papillosphincterotomy with diagnostic purpose (to perform endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography after failure of traditional cannulation) and for the purpose of performing transpapillary operations has naturally led to the development of new non-standard methods of endoscopic papillotomy, the introduction of new instruments – wire guides and guided cannulas. Further increase in the frequency of successful endoscopic papillotomy can be facilitated by using atypical methods of surgery. Some authors show that classical papillosphincterotomy is comparable to the method of endoscopic papillosphincterotomy with balloon dilatation in effectiveness of extracting stones from the common bile duct. However, balloon dilatation in the extraction of choledocholithiasis is preferable due to fewer postoperative complications.The authors of this article note that endoscopic management do not always solve the problem of choledocholithiasis, but still have undeniable advantages compared with the laparotomy, in which choledocholithotomy sometimes has to be expanded, and duodenotomy with transduodenal papillosphincterotomy is conducted. Literature shows that main mortality causes after endoscopic interventions in patients with choledocholithiasis were progression of purulent cholangitis, biliary sepsis, acute postoperative pancreatitis, “discharge” syndrome.
format	article
author	Vyacheslav B. Rinchinov Aleksandr N. Plekhanov
author_facet	Vyacheslav B. Rinchinov Aleksandr N. Plekhanov
author_sort	Vyacheslav B. Rinchinov
title	The Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Endoscopic Transpapillary Interventions (Literature Review)
title_short	The Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Endoscopic Transpapillary Interventions (Literature Review)
title_full	The Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Endoscopic Transpapillary Interventions (Literature Review)
title_fullStr	The Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Endoscopic Transpapillary Interventions (Literature Review)
title_full_unstemmed	The Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Endoscopic Transpapillary Interventions (Literature Review)
title_sort	comparative analysis of the effectiveness of endoscopic transpapillary interventions (literature review)
publisher	Scientific Сentre for Family Health and Human Reproduction Problems
publishDate	2019
url	https://doaj.org/article/e60a5f5d20ce48baa569c4a9590580f4
work_keys_str_mv	AT vyacheslavbrinchinov thecomparativeanalysisoftheeffectivenessofendoscopictranspapillaryinterventionsliteraturereview AT aleksandrnplekhanov thecomparativeanalysisoftheeffectivenessofendoscopictranspapillaryinterventionsliteraturereview AT vyacheslavbrinchinov comparativeanalysisoftheeffectivenessofendoscopictranspapillaryinterventionsliteraturereview AT aleksandrnplekhanov comparativeanalysisoftheeffectivenessofendoscopictranspapillaryinterventionsliteraturereview
_version_	1718416980798603264

The Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Endoscopic Transpapillary Interventions (Literature Review)

Ejemplares similares