From Impulse to Action—<i>Noah</i> (2014) and <i>Exodus: Gods and Kings</i> (2014) as Secular Bible Epics
Several large-scale Bible epics have been produced in the decade after the revival of epic cinema at the turn of the millennium. Yet, while many biblical films of this period were primarily aimed at religious audiences, Darren Aronofsky’s <i>Noah</i> (2014) and Ridley Scott’s <i>Ex...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/e663e3e488b740ffb61c2318703d3677 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:e663e3e488b740ffb61c2318703d3677 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:e663e3e488b740ffb61c2318703d36772021-11-25T18:53:28ZFrom Impulse to Action—<i>Noah</i> (2014) and <i>Exodus: Gods and Kings</i> (2014) as Secular Bible Epics10.3390/rel121110252077-1444https://doaj.org/article/e663e3e488b740ffb61c2318703d36772021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/11/1025https://doaj.org/toc/2077-1444Several large-scale Bible epics have been produced in the decade after the revival of epic cinema at the turn of the millennium. Yet, while many biblical films of this period were primarily aimed at religious audiences, Darren Aronofsky’s <i>Noah</i> (2014) and Ridley Scott’s <i>Exodus:</i><i>Gods and Kings</i> (2014) stand out due to their broader epic appeal and religious skepticism. Using Gilles Deleuze’s concepts of the impulse-image and the action-image as framework, this article analyses some of the nuances and complexities of both films. It argues that although both films offer scale and spectacle consistent with older biblical epics, the portrayal of their lead characters as a man determined on destruction (<i>Noah</i>) and religious skeptic and warrior (<i>Exodus</i>) differentiates them from traditional biblical cinema. Additionally, comparing both films helps articulate nuances within Deleuze’s movement-image that are often overlooked. Having proclaimed that modern cinema brings with it a crisis of truth that challenges the certainties of classic American cinema and its clear ideas on morality and belief, Deleuze ultimately calls for a leap of faith to reinstate the possibility of action. The article concludes that <i>Noah</i> and <i>Exodus</i> offer us a bit of both—spiritual uncertainty <i>and</i> a return of classic epic cinema.Sylvie MagerstädtMDPI AGarticleBible epics<i>Noah</i><i>Exodus: Gods and Kings</i>film-philosophyDeleuzeepic cinemaReligions. Mythology. RationalismBL1-2790ENReligions, Vol 12, Iss 1025, p 1025 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Bible epics <i>Noah</i> <i>Exodus: Gods and Kings</i> film-philosophy Deleuze epic cinema Religions. Mythology. Rationalism BL1-2790 |
spellingShingle |
Bible epics <i>Noah</i> <i>Exodus: Gods and Kings</i> film-philosophy Deleuze epic cinema Religions. Mythology. Rationalism BL1-2790 Sylvie Magerstädt From Impulse to Action—<i>Noah</i> (2014) and <i>Exodus: Gods and Kings</i> (2014) as Secular Bible Epics |
description |
Several large-scale Bible epics have been produced in the decade after the revival of epic cinema at the turn of the millennium. Yet, while many biblical films of this period were primarily aimed at religious audiences, Darren Aronofsky’s <i>Noah</i> (2014) and Ridley Scott’s <i>Exodus:</i><i>Gods and Kings</i> (2014) stand out due to their broader epic appeal and religious skepticism. Using Gilles Deleuze’s concepts of the impulse-image and the action-image as framework, this article analyses some of the nuances and complexities of both films. It argues that although both films offer scale and spectacle consistent with older biblical epics, the portrayal of their lead characters as a man determined on destruction (<i>Noah</i>) and religious skeptic and warrior (<i>Exodus</i>) differentiates them from traditional biblical cinema. Additionally, comparing both films helps articulate nuances within Deleuze’s movement-image that are often overlooked. Having proclaimed that modern cinema brings with it a crisis of truth that challenges the certainties of classic American cinema and its clear ideas on morality and belief, Deleuze ultimately calls for a leap of faith to reinstate the possibility of action. The article concludes that <i>Noah</i> and <i>Exodus</i> offer us a bit of both—spiritual uncertainty <i>and</i> a return of classic epic cinema. |
format |
article |
author |
Sylvie Magerstädt |
author_facet |
Sylvie Magerstädt |
author_sort |
Sylvie Magerstädt |
title |
From Impulse to Action—<i>Noah</i> (2014) and <i>Exodus: Gods and Kings</i> (2014) as Secular Bible Epics |
title_short |
From Impulse to Action—<i>Noah</i> (2014) and <i>Exodus: Gods and Kings</i> (2014) as Secular Bible Epics |
title_full |
From Impulse to Action—<i>Noah</i> (2014) and <i>Exodus: Gods and Kings</i> (2014) as Secular Bible Epics |
title_fullStr |
From Impulse to Action—<i>Noah</i> (2014) and <i>Exodus: Gods and Kings</i> (2014) as Secular Bible Epics |
title_full_unstemmed |
From Impulse to Action—<i>Noah</i> (2014) and <i>Exodus: Gods and Kings</i> (2014) as Secular Bible Epics |
title_sort |
from impulse to action—<i>noah</i> (2014) and <i>exodus: gods and kings</i> (2014) as secular bible epics |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/e663e3e488b740ffb61c2318703d3677 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sylviemagerstadt fromimpulsetoactioninoahi2014andiexodusgodsandkingsi2014assecularbibleepics |
_version_ |
1718410625081671680 |