From Impulse to Action—<i>Noah</i> (2014) and <i>Exodus: Gods and Kings</i> (2014) as Secular Bible Epics

Several large-scale Bible epics have been produced in the decade after the revival of epic cinema at the turn of the millennium. Yet, while many biblical films of this period were primarily aimed at religious audiences, Darren Aronofsky’s <i>Noah</i> (2014) and Ridley Scott’s <i>Ex...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Sylvie Magerstädt
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e663e3e488b740ffb61c2318703d3677
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e663e3e488b740ffb61c2318703d3677
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e663e3e488b740ffb61c2318703d36772021-11-25T18:53:28ZFrom Impulse to Action—<i>Noah</i> (2014) and <i>Exodus: Gods and Kings</i> (2014) as Secular Bible Epics10.3390/rel121110252077-1444https://doaj.org/article/e663e3e488b740ffb61c2318703d36772021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/11/1025https://doaj.org/toc/2077-1444Several large-scale Bible epics have been produced in the decade after the revival of epic cinema at the turn of the millennium. Yet, while many biblical films of this period were primarily aimed at religious audiences, Darren Aronofsky’s <i>Noah</i> (2014) and Ridley Scott’s <i>Exodus:</i><i>Gods and Kings</i> (2014) stand out due to their broader epic appeal and religious skepticism. Using Gilles Deleuze’s concepts of the impulse-image and the action-image as framework, this article analyses some of the nuances and complexities of both films. It argues that although both films offer scale and spectacle consistent with older biblical epics, the portrayal of their lead characters as a man determined on destruction (<i>Noah</i>) and religious skeptic and warrior (<i>Exodus</i>) differentiates them from traditional biblical cinema. Additionally, comparing both films helps articulate nuances within Deleuze’s movement-image that are often overlooked. Having proclaimed that modern cinema brings with it a crisis of truth that challenges the certainties of classic American cinema and its clear ideas on morality and belief, Deleuze ultimately calls for a leap of faith to reinstate the possibility of action. The article concludes that <i>Noah</i> and <i>Exodus</i> offer us a bit of both—spiritual uncertainty <i>and</i> a return of classic epic cinema.Sylvie MagerstädtMDPI AGarticleBible epics<i>Noah</i><i>Exodus: Gods and Kings</i>film-philosophyDeleuzeepic cinemaReligions. Mythology. RationalismBL1-2790ENReligions, Vol 12, Iss 1025, p 1025 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Bible epics
<i>Noah</i>
<i>Exodus: Gods and Kings</i>
film-philosophy
Deleuze
epic cinema
Religions. Mythology. Rationalism
BL1-2790
spellingShingle Bible epics
<i>Noah</i>
<i>Exodus: Gods and Kings</i>
film-philosophy
Deleuze
epic cinema
Religions. Mythology. Rationalism
BL1-2790
Sylvie Magerstädt
From Impulse to Action—<i>Noah</i> (2014) and <i>Exodus: Gods and Kings</i> (2014) as Secular Bible Epics
description Several large-scale Bible epics have been produced in the decade after the revival of epic cinema at the turn of the millennium. Yet, while many biblical films of this period were primarily aimed at religious audiences, Darren Aronofsky’s <i>Noah</i> (2014) and Ridley Scott’s <i>Exodus:</i><i>Gods and Kings</i> (2014) stand out due to their broader epic appeal and religious skepticism. Using Gilles Deleuze’s concepts of the impulse-image and the action-image as framework, this article analyses some of the nuances and complexities of both films. It argues that although both films offer scale and spectacle consistent with older biblical epics, the portrayal of their lead characters as a man determined on destruction (<i>Noah</i>) and religious skeptic and warrior (<i>Exodus</i>) differentiates them from traditional biblical cinema. Additionally, comparing both films helps articulate nuances within Deleuze’s movement-image that are often overlooked. Having proclaimed that modern cinema brings with it a crisis of truth that challenges the certainties of classic American cinema and its clear ideas on morality and belief, Deleuze ultimately calls for a leap of faith to reinstate the possibility of action. The article concludes that <i>Noah</i> and <i>Exodus</i> offer us a bit of both—spiritual uncertainty <i>and</i> a return of classic epic cinema.
format article
author Sylvie Magerstädt
author_facet Sylvie Magerstädt
author_sort Sylvie Magerstädt
title From Impulse to Action—<i>Noah</i> (2014) and <i>Exodus: Gods and Kings</i> (2014) as Secular Bible Epics
title_short From Impulse to Action—<i>Noah</i> (2014) and <i>Exodus: Gods and Kings</i> (2014) as Secular Bible Epics
title_full From Impulse to Action—<i>Noah</i> (2014) and <i>Exodus: Gods and Kings</i> (2014) as Secular Bible Epics
title_fullStr From Impulse to Action—<i>Noah</i> (2014) and <i>Exodus: Gods and Kings</i> (2014) as Secular Bible Epics
title_full_unstemmed From Impulse to Action—<i>Noah</i> (2014) and <i>Exodus: Gods and Kings</i> (2014) as Secular Bible Epics
title_sort from impulse to action—<i>noah</i> (2014) and <i>exodus: gods and kings</i> (2014) as secular bible epics
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/e663e3e488b740ffb61c2318703d3677
work_keys_str_mv AT sylviemagerstadt fromimpulsetoactioninoahi2014andiexodusgodsandkingsi2014assecularbibleepics
_version_ 1718410625081671680