The prediction of criminal recidivism using routinely available file information

Objective. The aim of the present study was to cross-validate the investigation of Buchanan and Leese (2006) into the prediction of criminal recidivism. Method. The sample comprised offenders in the criminal justice system of the Canton of Zürich – Switzerland, who were discharged to the community....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Diana Fries, Astrid Rossegger, Jérôme Endrass, Jay P. Singh
Format: article
Language:EN
ES
Published: Universidad de San Buenaventura 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doaj.org/article/e681b81f7bae470fb0d33bafc6d167bd
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective. The aim of the present study was to cross-validate the investigation of Buchanan and Leese (2006) into the prediction of criminal recidivism. Method. The sample comprised offenders in the criminal justice system of the Canton of Zürich – Switzerland, who were discharged to the community. Participants were followed, and evidence of subsequent charges and convictions for both general and serious recidivism was investigated at fixed periods of 2.5, 6.5, and 10.5 years. The predictive validity of socio-demographic, criminal history, and legal class information was assessed using logistic regression as well as log-likelihood, receiver operating characteristic curve, and contingency analyses. Results. A multivariable model including age and criminal history information was found to produce the highest rates of predictive validity for general and serious recidivism. Conclusion. Information regularly accessible in forensic practice may be able to guide clinicians as to the recidivism risk level of their patients.