Morally excused but socially excluded: Denying agency through the defense of mental impairment.
Defendants can deny they have agency, and thus responsibility, for a crime by using a defense of mental impairment. We argue that although this strategy may help defendants evade blame, it may carry longer-term social costs, as lay people's perceptions of a person's agency might determine...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Melissa de Vel-Palumbo, Chelsea Schein, Rose Ferguson, Melissa Xue-Ling Chang, Brock Bastian |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/e6ab8d3c3b554045ad65dbf4cd2d2d53 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Denying the severity of mental health problems to deny rights to the homeless
por: Caroline Hunter
Publicado: (2008) -
Denis Diderot on War and Peace: Nature and Morality
por: Whitney Mannies, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Excluded
por: David Asai
Publicado: (2020) -
Singirok claims denied
por: Peter Cronau
Publicado: (1997) -
Denis ROLLAND et Joëlle CHASSIN (coord.), Pour comprendre la Bolivie d’Evo Morales
por: Michel Bertrand
Publicado: (2009)