Comparison of blood pressure measurements in the upper and lower extremities versus arterial blood pressure readings in children under general anesthesia

Seth Hayes,1 Rebecca Miller,1 Ambrish Patel,2,3 Dmitry Tumin,1,2 Hina Walia,1 Mohammed Hakim,1 Faizaan Syed,1 Joseph D Tobias1,2,41Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USA; 2Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Hayes S, Miller R, Patel A, Tumin D, Walia H, Hakim M, Syed F, Tobias JD
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Dove Medical Press 2019
Materias:	Invasive blood pressure Non-invasive blood pressure Blood pressure cuff Medical technology R855-855.5
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/e6e71c39eae348228cde7f24fa9ab667
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:e6e71c39eae348228cde7f24fa9ab667
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:e6e71c39eae348228cde7f24fa9ab6672021-12-02T03:40:41ZComparison of blood pressure measurements in the upper and lower extremities versus arterial blood pressure readings in children under general anesthesia1179-1470https://doaj.org/article/e6e71c39eae348228cde7f24fa9ab6672019-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-blood-pressure-measurements-in-the-upper-and-lower-extre-peer-reviewed-article-MDERhttps://doaj.org/toc/1179-1470Seth Hayes,1 Rebecca Miller,1 Ambrish Patel,2,3 Dmitry Tumin,1,2 Hina Walia,1 Mohammed Hakim,1 Faizaan Syed,1 Joseph D Tobias1,2,41Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USA; 2Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; 3Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USA; 4Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USACorrespondence: Seth HayesDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, 700 Children’s Drive, Columbus, OH 43205, USATel +1 614 722 4200Fax +1 614 722 4203Email seth.hayes@nationwidechildrens.orgPurpose: To compare invasive blood pressure (IBP) readings obtained from an arterial cannula with non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurements from oscillometric cuffs on the upper and lower extremities of infants and children under general anesthesia.Patients and methods: Patients under 10 years of age were enrolled in our study if they were to receive general anesthesia with planned placement of a radial arterial cannula. At 5 mins intervals, IBP was measured using a fluid-coupled pressure transducer and NIBP was measured with two oscillometers with appropriately sized cuffs placed on the upper arm and lower leg, for 10 readings per patient.Results: The study enrolled 18 boys and 12 girls, ranging in age from 0 to 8 years. Across 300 data points, the absolute difference between the arm and invasive mean arterial pressure (MAP) measurements was 7±7 mmHg (range: 0–52 mmHg). The absolute difference between the leg and invasive MAP measurements was 8±8 mmHg (range: 0–52 mmHg). Although both non-invasive measurement sites demonstrated frequent deviation from invasive measurement, large deviations were more common when BP was measured at the leg (81 of 298 observations (27%) deviating by >10 mmHg) compared to the arm (60 of 300 observations (20%) deviating by >10 mmHg).Conclusion: The frequency of clinically significant NIBP deviation in children under general anesthesia supports the importance of IBP monitoring when hemodynamic fluctuations are likely and would be particularly detrimental. NIBP measured at the lower leg is more likely to result in clinically significant deviation from invasively measured MAP than NIBP values obtained from an upper arm.Keywords: invasive blood pressure, non-invasive blood pressure, blood pressure cuffHayes SMiller RPatel ATumin DWalia HHakim MSyed FTobias JDDove Medical PressarticleInvasive blood pressureNon-invasive blood pressureBlood pressure cuffMedical technologyR855-855.5ENMedical Devices: Evidence and Research, Vol Volume 12, Pp 297-303 (2019)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Invasive blood pressure Non-invasive blood pressure Blood pressure cuff Medical technology R855-855.5
spellingShingle	Invasive blood pressure Non-invasive blood pressure Blood pressure cuff Medical technology R855-855.5 Hayes S Miller R Patel A Tumin D Walia H Hakim M Syed F Tobias JD Comparison of blood pressure measurements in the upper and lower extremities versus arterial blood pressure readings in children under general anesthesia
description	Seth Hayes,1 Rebecca Miller,1 Ambrish Patel,2,3 Dmitry Tumin,1,2 Hina Walia,1 Mohammed Hakim,1 Faizaan Syed,1 Joseph D Tobias1,2,41Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USA; 2Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; 3Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USA; 4Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USACorrespondence: Seth HayesDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, 700 Children’s Drive, Columbus, OH 43205, USATel +1 614 722 4200Fax +1 614 722 4203Email seth.hayes@nationwidechildrens.orgPurpose: To compare invasive blood pressure (IBP) readings obtained from an arterial cannula with non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurements from oscillometric cuffs on the upper and lower extremities of infants and children under general anesthesia.Patients and methods: Patients under 10 years of age were enrolled in our study if they were to receive general anesthesia with planned placement of a radial arterial cannula. At 5 mins intervals, IBP was measured using a fluid-coupled pressure transducer and NIBP was measured with two oscillometers with appropriately sized cuffs placed on the upper arm and lower leg, for 10 readings per patient.Results: The study enrolled 18 boys and 12 girls, ranging in age from 0 to 8 years. Across 300 data points, the absolute difference between the arm and invasive mean arterial pressure (MAP) measurements was 7±7 mmHg (range: 0–52 mmHg). The absolute difference between the leg and invasive MAP measurements was 8±8 mmHg (range: 0–52 mmHg). Although both non-invasive measurement sites demonstrated frequent deviation from invasive measurement, large deviations were more common when BP was measured at the leg (81 of 298 observations (27%) deviating by >10 mmHg) compared to the arm (60 of 300 observations (20%) deviating by >10 mmHg).Conclusion: The frequency of clinically significant NIBP deviation in children under general anesthesia supports the importance of IBP monitoring when hemodynamic fluctuations are likely and would be particularly detrimental. NIBP measured at the lower leg is more likely to result in clinically significant deviation from invasively measured MAP than NIBP values obtained from an upper arm.Keywords: invasive blood pressure, non-invasive blood pressure, blood pressure cuff
format	article
author	Hayes S Miller R Patel A Tumin D Walia H Hakim M Syed F Tobias JD
author_facet	Hayes S Miller R Patel A Tumin D Walia H Hakim M Syed F Tobias JD
author_sort	Hayes S
title	Comparison of blood pressure measurements in the upper and lower extremities versus arterial blood pressure readings in children under general anesthesia
title_short	Comparison of blood pressure measurements in the upper and lower extremities versus arterial blood pressure readings in children under general anesthesia
title_full	Comparison of blood pressure measurements in the upper and lower extremities versus arterial blood pressure readings in children under general anesthesia
title_fullStr	Comparison of blood pressure measurements in the upper and lower extremities versus arterial blood pressure readings in children under general anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed	Comparison of blood pressure measurements in the upper and lower extremities versus arterial blood pressure readings in children under general anesthesia
title_sort	comparison of blood pressure measurements in the upper and lower extremities versus arterial blood pressure readings in children under general anesthesia
publisher	Dove Medical Press
publishDate	2019
url	https://doaj.org/article/e6e71c39eae348228cde7f24fa9ab667
work_keys_str_mv	AT hayess comparisonofbloodpressuremeasurementsintheupperandlowerextremitiesversusarterialbloodpressurereadingsinchildrenundergeneralanesthesia AT millerr comparisonofbloodpressuremeasurementsintheupperandlowerextremitiesversusarterialbloodpressurereadingsinchildrenundergeneralanesthesia AT patela comparisonofbloodpressuremeasurementsintheupperandlowerextremitiesversusarterialbloodpressurereadingsinchildrenundergeneralanesthesia AT tumind comparisonofbloodpressuremeasurementsintheupperandlowerextremitiesversusarterialbloodpressurereadingsinchildrenundergeneralanesthesia AT waliah comparisonofbloodpressuremeasurementsintheupperandlowerextremitiesversusarterialbloodpressurereadingsinchildrenundergeneralanesthesia AT hakimm comparisonofbloodpressuremeasurementsintheupperandlowerextremitiesversusarterialbloodpressurereadingsinchildrenundergeneralanesthesia AT syedf comparisonofbloodpressuremeasurementsintheupperandlowerextremitiesversusarterialbloodpressurereadingsinchildrenundergeneralanesthesia AT tobiasjd comparisonofbloodpressuremeasurementsintheupperandlowerextremitiesversusarterialbloodpressurereadingsinchildrenundergeneralanesthesia
_version_	1718401705037529088

Comparison of blood pressure measurements in the upper and lower extremities versus arterial blood pressure readings in children under general anesthesia

Ejemplares similares