Incorporating Robustness to Imaging Physics into Radiomic Feature Selection for Breast Cancer Risk Estimation

Digital mammography has seen an explosion in the number of radiomic features used for risk-assessment modeling. However, having more features is not necessarily beneficial, as some features may be overly sensitive to imaging physics (contrast, noise, and image sharpness). To measure the effects of i...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raymond J. Acciavatti, Eric A. Cohen, Omid Haji Maghsoudi, Aimilia Gastounioti, Lauren Pantalone, Meng-Kang Hsieh, Emily F. Conant, Christopher G. Scott, Stacey J. Winham, Karla Kerlikowske, Celine Vachon, Andrew D. A. Maidment, Despina Kontos
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e71709f14ea1497aa9a63b8d583d6da1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e71709f14ea1497aa9a63b8d583d6da1
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e71709f14ea1497aa9a63b8d583d6da12021-11-11T15:33:44ZIncorporating Robustness to Imaging Physics into Radiomic Feature Selection for Breast Cancer Risk Estimation10.3390/cancers132154972072-6694https://doaj.org/article/e71709f14ea1497aa9a63b8d583d6da12021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/13/21/5497https://doaj.org/toc/2072-6694Digital mammography has seen an explosion in the number of radiomic features used for risk-assessment modeling. However, having more features is not necessarily beneficial, as some features may be overly sensitive to imaging physics (contrast, noise, and image sharpness). To measure the effects of imaging physics, we analyzed the feature variation across imaging acquisition settings (kV, mAs) using an anthropomorphic phantom. We also analyzed the intra-woman variation (IWV), a measure of how much a feature varies between breasts with similar parenchymal patterns—a woman’s left and right breasts. From 341 features, we identified “robust” features that minimized the effects of imaging physics and IWV. We also investigated whether robust features offered better case-control classification in an independent data set of 575 images, all with an overall BI-RADS<sup>®</sup> assessment of 1 (negative) or 2 (benign); 115 images (cases) were of women who developed cancer at least one year after that screening image, matched to 460 controls. We modeled cancer occurrence via logistic regression, using cross-validated area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) to measure model performance. Models using features from the most-robust quartile of features yielded an AUC = 0.59, versus 0.54 for the least-robust, with <i>p</i> < 0.005 for the difference among the quartiles.Raymond J. AcciavattiEric A. CohenOmid Haji MaghsoudiAimilia GastouniotiLauren PantaloneMeng-Kang HsiehEmily F. ConantChristopher G. ScottStacey J. WinhamKarla KerlikowskeCeline VachonAndrew D. A. MaidmentDespina KontosMDPI AGarticleradiomicsdigital mammographyrobustnessfeature selectionanthropomorphic phantomcase-control analysisNeoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogensRC254-282ENCancers, Vol 13, Iss 5497, p 5497 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic radiomics
digital mammography
robustness
feature selection
anthropomorphic phantom
case-control analysis
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
spellingShingle radiomics
digital mammography
robustness
feature selection
anthropomorphic phantom
case-control analysis
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
Raymond J. Acciavatti
Eric A. Cohen
Omid Haji Maghsoudi
Aimilia Gastounioti
Lauren Pantalone
Meng-Kang Hsieh
Emily F. Conant
Christopher G. Scott
Stacey J. Winham
Karla Kerlikowske
Celine Vachon
Andrew D. A. Maidment
Despina Kontos
Incorporating Robustness to Imaging Physics into Radiomic Feature Selection for Breast Cancer Risk Estimation
description Digital mammography has seen an explosion in the number of radiomic features used for risk-assessment modeling. However, having more features is not necessarily beneficial, as some features may be overly sensitive to imaging physics (contrast, noise, and image sharpness). To measure the effects of imaging physics, we analyzed the feature variation across imaging acquisition settings (kV, mAs) using an anthropomorphic phantom. We also analyzed the intra-woman variation (IWV), a measure of how much a feature varies between breasts with similar parenchymal patterns—a woman’s left and right breasts. From 341 features, we identified “robust” features that minimized the effects of imaging physics and IWV. We also investigated whether robust features offered better case-control classification in an independent data set of 575 images, all with an overall BI-RADS<sup>®</sup> assessment of 1 (negative) or 2 (benign); 115 images (cases) were of women who developed cancer at least one year after that screening image, matched to 460 controls. We modeled cancer occurrence via logistic regression, using cross-validated area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) to measure model performance. Models using features from the most-robust quartile of features yielded an AUC = 0.59, versus 0.54 for the least-robust, with <i>p</i> < 0.005 for the difference among the quartiles.
format article
author Raymond J. Acciavatti
Eric A. Cohen
Omid Haji Maghsoudi
Aimilia Gastounioti
Lauren Pantalone
Meng-Kang Hsieh
Emily F. Conant
Christopher G. Scott
Stacey J. Winham
Karla Kerlikowske
Celine Vachon
Andrew D. A. Maidment
Despina Kontos
author_facet Raymond J. Acciavatti
Eric A. Cohen
Omid Haji Maghsoudi
Aimilia Gastounioti
Lauren Pantalone
Meng-Kang Hsieh
Emily F. Conant
Christopher G. Scott
Stacey J. Winham
Karla Kerlikowske
Celine Vachon
Andrew D. A. Maidment
Despina Kontos
author_sort Raymond J. Acciavatti
title Incorporating Robustness to Imaging Physics into Radiomic Feature Selection for Breast Cancer Risk Estimation
title_short Incorporating Robustness to Imaging Physics into Radiomic Feature Selection for Breast Cancer Risk Estimation
title_full Incorporating Robustness to Imaging Physics into Radiomic Feature Selection for Breast Cancer Risk Estimation
title_fullStr Incorporating Robustness to Imaging Physics into Radiomic Feature Selection for Breast Cancer Risk Estimation
title_full_unstemmed Incorporating Robustness to Imaging Physics into Radiomic Feature Selection for Breast Cancer Risk Estimation
title_sort incorporating robustness to imaging physics into radiomic feature selection for breast cancer risk estimation
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/e71709f14ea1497aa9a63b8d583d6da1
work_keys_str_mv AT raymondjacciavatti incorporatingrobustnesstoimagingphysicsintoradiomicfeatureselectionforbreastcancerriskestimation
AT ericacohen incorporatingrobustnesstoimagingphysicsintoradiomicfeatureselectionforbreastcancerriskestimation
AT omidhajimaghsoudi incorporatingrobustnesstoimagingphysicsintoradiomicfeatureselectionforbreastcancerriskestimation
AT aimiliagastounioti incorporatingrobustnesstoimagingphysicsintoradiomicfeatureselectionforbreastcancerriskestimation
AT laurenpantalone incorporatingrobustnesstoimagingphysicsintoradiomicfeatureselectionforbreastcancerriskestimation
AT mengkanghsieh incorporatingrobustnesstoimagingphysicsintoradiomicfeatureselectionforbreastcancerriskestimation
AT emilyfconant incorporatingrobustnesstoimagingphysicsintoradiomicfeatureselectionforbreastcancerriskestimation
AT christophergscott incorporatingrobustnesstoimagingphysicsintoradiomicfeatureselectionforbreastcancerriskestimation
AT staceyjwinham incorporatingrobustnesstoimagingphysicsintoradiomicfeatureselectionforbreastcancerriskestimation
AT karlakerlikowske incorporatingrobustnesstoimagingphysicsintoradiomicfeatureselectionforbreastcancerriskestimation
AT celinevachon incorporatingrobustnesstoimagingphysicsintoradiomicfeatureselectionforbreastcancerriskestimation
AT andrewdamaidment incorporatingrobustnesstoimagingphysicsintoradiomicfeatureselectionforbreastcancerriskestimation
AT despinakontos incorporatingrobustnesstoimagingphysicsintoradiomicfeatureselectionforbreastcancerriskestimation
_version_ 1718435215744958464