Comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XL
Ihsan Yilmaz, Cigdem Altan, Ebru Demet Aygit, Cengiz Alagoz, Okkes Baz, Sibel Ahmet, Semih Urvasizoglu, Dilek Yasa, Ahmet DemirokBeyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, TurkeyObjective: We aimed to compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements via three different tonometers: the Gol...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Yilmaz I, Altan C, Aygit ED, Alagoz C, Baz O, Ahmet S, Urvasizoglu S, Yasa D, Demirok A |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Language: | EN |
Published: |
Dove Medical Press
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/e71f454afe6e410195003c54f7f6809a |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the portable PT100 noncontact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry
by: Sarwat Salim, et al.
Published: (2009) -
Comparative evaluation of intraocular pressure with an air-puff tonometer versus a Goldmann applanation tonometer
by: Farhood QK
Published: (2012) -
A Comparative Study Between the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer and the Non-Contact Air-Puff Tonometer (Huvitz HNT 7000) in Normal Eyes
by: Stock RA, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Comparison of intraocular pressure adjusted by central corneal thickness or corneal biomechanical properties as measured in glaucomatous eyes using noncontact tonometers and the Goldmann applanation tonometer
by: Yaoeda K, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Goldmann tonometer error correcting prism: clinical evaluation
by: McCafferty S, et al.
Published: (2017)