Using indices of species’ potential range to inform conservation status

Assessments of conservation status are typically based on short-term extinction risk, but the value of indicators that compare the current state of species (e.g., abundance or distribution) to potential baselines is increasingly recognised. The use of baselines in conservation legislation is hindere...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tom H.E. Mason, Philip A. Stephens, Gillian Gilbert, Rhys E. Green, Jeremy D. Wilson, Kate Jennings, Judy R.M. Allen, Brian Huntley, Christine Howard, Stephen G. Willis
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e74d07b5067444ff95f414dcdc038998
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e74d07b5067444ff95f414dcdc038998
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e74d07b5067444ff95f414dcdc0389982021-12-01T04:43:27ZUsing indices of species’ potential range to inform conservation status1470-160X10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107343https://doaj.org/article/e74d07b5067444ff95f414dcdc0389982021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X2100008Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/1470-160XAssessments of conservation status are typically based on short-term extinction risk, but the value of indicators that compare the current state of species (e.g., abundance or distribution) to potential baselines is increasingly recognised. The use of baselines in conservation legislation is hindered by ambiguity in how baselines should be determined and interpreted, leading to inconsistent application. Here, we explored the use of species’ potential ranges as a consistent means of quantifying baselines for assessing species’ distributions, a key component of conservation status. Using breeding birds of Great Britain (GB) as a case study, we simulated where bird species would be expected to occur today in a modelled world without human land use. We calculated indices that contrasted these potential human-free ranges with realised ranges. Our analyses revealed that 42% of GB birds have wider realised than potential ranges and 28% have narrower realised than potential ranges. These indices could lead to reassessments of current conservation priorities. Eighteen species assigned ‘least concern’ status by the GB regional IUCN Red List had much narrower realised than potential ranges, suggesting that their ranges are in a more degraded state than currently recognised by Red List criteria. Some of these species are not under active conservation management and could be candidates for higher prioritisation. Our approach provides a systematic means of quantifying range baselines that is not reliant on variable historic data or expert opinion and, thereby, provides a step forward in resolving a major contemporary problem in conservation assessment: how to set baselines in conservation consistently. The insights produced are also of wider scientific and cultural relevance, revealing where species would likely exist today in the absence of historic human impacts. This could be used to identify areas where targeted restoration actions might lead to the return of historically extirpated species, or even to novel colonists.Tom H.E. MasonPhilip A. StephensGillian GilbertRhys E. GreenJeremy D. WilsonKate JenningsJudy R.M. AllenBrian HuntleyChristine HowardStephen G. WillisElsevierarticleBaselinesBirdsConservation statusFavourable conservation statusGreat BritainLand use changeEcologyQH540-549.5ENEcological Indicators, Vol 123, Iss , Pp 107343- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Baselines
Birds
Conservation status
Favourable conservation status
Great Britain
Land use change
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle Baselines
Birds
Conservation status
Favourable conservation status
Great Britain
Land use change
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Tom H.E. Mason
Philip A. Stephens
Gillian Gilbert
Rhys E. Green
Jeremy D. Wilson
Kate Jennings
Judy R.M. Allen
Brian Huntley
Christine Howard
Stephen G. Willis
Using indices of species’ potential range to inform conservation status
description Assessments of conservation status are typically based on short-term extinction risk, but the value of indicators that compare the current state of species (e.g., abundance or distribution) to potential baselines is increasingly recognised. The use of baselines in conservation legislation is hindered by ambiguity in how baselines should be determined and interpreted, leading to inconsistent application. Here, we explored the use of species’ potential ranges as a consistent means of quantifying baselines for assessing species’ distributions, a key component of conservation status. Using breeding birds of Great Britain (GB) as a case study, we simulated where bird species would be expected to occur today in a modelled world without human land use. We calculated indices that contrasted these potential human-free ranges with realised ranges. Our analyses revealed that 42% of GB birds have wider realised than potential ranges and 28% have narrower realised than potential ranges. These indices could lead to reassessments of current conservation priorities. Eighteen species assigned ‘least concern’ status by the GB regional IUCN Red List had much narrower realised than potential ranges, suggesting that their ranges are in a more degraded state than currently recognised by Red List criteria. Some of these species are not under active conservation management and could be candidates for higher prioritisation. Our approach provides a systematic means of quantifying range baselines that is not reliant on variable historic data or expert opinion and, thereby, provides a step forward in resolving a major contemporary problem in conservation assessment: how to set baselines in conservation consistently. The insights produced are also of wider scientific and cultural relevance, revealing where species would likely exist today in the absence of historic human impacts. This could be used to identify areas where targeted restoration actions might lead to the return of historically extirpated species, or even to novel colonists.
format article
author Tom H.E. Mason
Philip A. Stephens
Gillian Gilbert
Rhys E. Green
Jeremy D. Wilson
Kate Jennings
Judy R.M. Allen
Brian Huntley
Christine Howard
Stephen G. Willis
author_facet Tom H.E. Mason
Philip A. Stephens
Gillian Gilbert
Rhys E. Green
Jeremy D. Wilson
Kate Jennings
Judy R.M. Allen
Brian Huntley
Christine Howard
Stephen G. Willis
author_sort Tom H.E. Mason
title Using indices of species’ potential range to inform conservation status
title_short Using indices of species’ potential range to inform conservation status
title_full Using indices of species’ potential range to inform conservation status
title_fullStr Using indices of species’ potential range to inform conservation status
title_full_unstemmed Using indices of species’ potential range to inform conservation status
title_sort using indices of species’ potential range to inform conservation status
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/e74d07b5067444ff95f414dcdc038998
work_keys_str_mv AT tomhemason usingindicesofspeciespotentialrangetoinformconservationstatus
AT philipastephens usingindicesofspeciespotentialrangetoinformconservationstatus
AT gilliangilbert usingindicesofspeciespotentialrangetoinformconservationstatus
AT rhysegreen usingindicesofspeciespotentialrangetoinformconservationstatus
AT jeremydwilson usingindicesofspeciespotentialrangetoinformconservationstatus
AT katejennings usingindicesofspeciespotentialrangetoinformconservationstatus
AT judyrmallen usingindicesofspeciespotentialrangetoinformconservationstatus
AT brianhuntley usingindicesofspeciespotentialrangetoinformconservationstatus
AT christinehoward usingindicesofspeciespotentialrangetoinformconservationstatus
AT stephengwillis usingindicesofspeciespotentialrangetoinformconservationstatus
_version_ 1718405798343737344