La construction genrée de la parenté par le droit de la procréation en France et en Allemagne

Research Framework: In both France and Germany, reproduction law is often presented as structured around freedom, autonomy and choice based paradigms. While it is undeniable that the law now allows individuals, especially women, to make reproductive choices, the fact remains that it further encourag...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Laurie Marguet
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FR
Publicado: Centre Urbanisation Culture Société (UCS) de l'INRS 2021
Materias:
law
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e74ee37711a24cabafdbe46ee91bfed1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e74ee37711a24cabafdbe46ee91bfed1
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e74ee37711a24cabafdbe46ee91bfed12021-12-02T11:24:40ZLa construction genrée de la parenté par le droit de la procréation en France et en Allemagne1708-6310https://doaj.org/article/e74ee37711a24cabafdbe46ee91bfed12021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.openedition.org/efg/11829https://doaj.org/toc/1708-6310Research Framework: In both France and Germany, reproduction law is often presented as structured around freedom, autonomy and choice based paradigms. While it is undeniable that the law now allows individuals, especially women, to make reproductive choices, the fact remains that it further encourages some reproductive choices at the expense of others. The way in which the law frames the reproductive choices of individuals tells us something about the model of the “ideal” family that is put forward by the state. While this model differs somewhat between legal orders depending on the social, historical, cultural or political context in France and Germany, it includes, however, a number of similarities, notably in that it perpetuates a gender order structured around the normalized distinction between “reproductive work” (traditionally attributed to women) and “productive work” (traditionally reserved for men). Objectives: This research analyzes the way reproductive law constructs an ideal model of kinship by promoting some reproductive choices and encouraging the founding of some types of families. This article aims to deconstruct the narrative surrounding the legal framework of reproduction that is understood as an autonomous choice, which allows women to refuse motherhood in a logic of maternal “over power” that creates inequalities for men. Methodology: We analyzed the legal framework (legal texts and case law), mainly regulating birth control, childbirth under X, abortion, medically assisted procreation, but also the establishment of filiation (parentage). Results: Our research has shown that the law encourages the constitution of the “genetic” family, which is assumed to be heteronormative, and can be apprehended in a differentiated way between motherhood and fatherhood. Conclusions: As the law standardizes behaviours, it “normalizes” individual choices that are not always considered as legitimized. The rules governing authorized procreation techniques in France and Germany are no exception to this principle. Although reproduction law authorizes birth control, anonymous delivery, abortion or medically assisted reproduction in both countries, it remains reluctant to accept the refusal of motherhood (more than the refusal of fatherhood) and instead encourages the founding of a heterosexual family in contrast to a non-heterosexual family. Contribution: Our research highlights the fundamental role of the law in legitimizing some parental projects or families.Laurie MarguetCentre Urbanisation Culture Société (UCS) de l'INRSarticlelawabortionanonymous deliverymedically assisted reproductionparentagemotherhoodEthnology. Social and cultural anthropologyGN301-674The family. Marriage. WomanHQ1-2044ENFREnfances, Familles, Générations (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FR
topic law
abortion
anonymous delivery
medically assisted reproduction
parentage
motherhood
Ethnology. Social and cultural anthropology
GN301-674
The family. Marriage. Woman
HQ1-2044
spellingShingle law
abortion
anonymous delivery
medically assisted reproduction
parentage
motherhood
Ethnology. Social and cultural anthropology
GN301-674
The family. Marriage. Woman
HQ1-2044
Laurie Marguet
La construction genrée de la parenté par le droit de la procréation en France et en Allemagne
description Research Framework: In both France and Germany, reproduction law is often presented as structured around freedom, autonomy and choice based paradigms. While it is undeniable that the law now allows individuals, especially women, to make reproductive choices, the fact remains that it further encourages some reproductive choices at the expense of others. The way in which the law frames the reproductive choices of individuals tells us something about the model of the “ideal” family that is put forward by the state. While this model differs somewhat between legal orders depending on the social, historical, cultural or political context in France and Germany, it includes, however, a number of similarities, notably in that it perpetuates a gender order structured around the normalized distinction between “reproductive work” (traditionally attributed to women) and “productive work” (traditionally reserved for men). Objectives: This research analyzes the way reproductive law constructs an ideal model of kinship by promoting some reproductive choices and encouraging the founding of some types of families. This article aims to deconstruct the narrative surrounding the legal framework of reproduction that is understood as an autonomous choice, which allows women to refuse motherhood in a logic of maternal “over power” that creates inequalities for men. Methodology: We analyzed the legal framework (legal texts and case law), mainly regulating birth control, childbirth under X, abortion, medically assisted procreation, but also the establishment of filiation (parentage). Results: Our research has shown that the law encourages the constitution of the “genetic” family, which is assumed to be heteronormative, and can be apprehended in a differentiated way between motherhood and fatherhood. Conclusions: As the law standardizes behaviours, it “normalizes” individual choices that are not always considered as legitimized. The rules governing authorized procreation techniques in France and Germany are no exception to this principle. Although reproduction law authorizes birth control, anonymous delivery, abortion or medically assisted reproduction in both countries, it remains reluctant to accept the refusal of motherhood (more than the refusal of fatherhood) and instead encourages the founding of a heterosexual family in contrast to a non-heterosexual family. Contribution: Our research highlights the fundamental role of the law in legitimizing some parental projects or families.
format article
author Laurie Marguet
author_facet Laurie Marguet
author_sort Laurie Marguet
title La construction genrée de la parenté par le droit de la procréation en France et en Allemagne
title_short La construction genrée de la parenté par le droit de la procréation en France et en Allemagne
title_full La construction genrée de la parenté par le droit de la procréation en France et en Allemagne
title_fullStr La construction genrée de la parenté par le droit de la procréation en France et en Allemagne
title_full_unstemmed La construction genrée de la parenté par le droit de la procréation en France et en Allemagne
title_sort la construction genrée de la parenté par le droit de la procréation en france et en allemagne
publisher Centre Urbanisation Culture Société (UCS) de l'INRS
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/e74ee37711a24cabafdbe46ee91bfed1
work_keys_str_mv AT lauriemarguet laconstructiongenreedelaparenteparledroitdelaprocreationenfranceetenallemagne
_version_ 1718395971126165504