Moonshots and metastatic disease: the need for a multi-faceted approach when studying atypical responses
Abstract Clinical research generally focuses on results involving a statistical mean with little attention in trial design to patients who respond considerably better or worse than average. Exploring the reasons underlying an “atypical response” will increase understanding of the mechanisms involved...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Kristine De La Torre, Elly Cohen, Anne Loeser, Marc Hurlbert, on behalf of the Metastatic Breast Cancer Alliance |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/e7649f26f6ab49d3870900bb82fb14bf |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Moonshot Science—Risks and Benefits
por: Arturo Casadevall, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Operation Warp Speed as a “Moonshot”: Some Public Policy Lessons
por: Nicholas Sowels
Publicado: (2021) -
Facet Joint Injection versus Radiofrequency Facet Neurotomy for Treatment of Lumbar Facet Joint Arthropathy
por: Ahmed Faisal Toubar, PhD.,, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
When one is sick and two need help: Caregivers’ perspectives on the negative consequences of caring
por: Ilja Ormel, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Uncovering the socioeconomic facets of human mobility
por: Hugo Barbosa, et al.
Publicado: (2021)