Agreement for depression diagnosis between DSM-IV-TR criteria, three validated scales, oncologist assessment, and psychiatric clinical interview in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer

Wadih Rhondali,1 Gilles Freyer,2 Virginie Adam,3 Marilène Filbet,4 Martine Derzelle,5 Gaelle Abgrall-Barbry,6 Sophie Bourcelot,7 Jean-Louis Machavoine,8 Muriel Chomat-Neyraud,9 Olivier Gisserot,10 Rémi Largillier,11 Annick Le Rol,12 Frank Priou,13 Pierre Saltel,14 Claire Faland...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Rhondali W, Freyer G, Adam V, Filbet M, Derzelle M, Abgrall-Barbry G, Bourcelot S, Machavoine JL, Chomat-Neyraud M, Gisserot O, Largillier R, Le Rol A, Priou F, Saltel P, Falandry C
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:	depression elderly cancer screening geriatric assessment Geriatrics RC952-954.6
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/e770c39c06ac4e90a4b6e5d4cd28f87e
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:e770c39c06ac4e90a4b6e5d4cd28f87e
record_format	dspace
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	depression elderly cancer screening geriatric assessment Geriatrics RC952-954.6
spellingShingle	depression elderly cancer screening geriatric assessment Geriatrics RC952-954.6 Rhondali W Freyer G Adam V Filbet M Derzelle M Abgrall-Barbry G Bourcelot S Machavoine JL Chomat-Neyraud M Gisserot O Largillier R Le Rol A Priou F Saltel P Falandry C Agreement for depression diagnosis between DSM-IV-TR criteria, three validated scales, oncologist assessment, and psychiatric clinical interview in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer
description	Wadih Rhondali,1 Gilles Freyer,2 Virginie Adam,3 Marilène Filbet,4 Martine Derzelle,5 Gaelle Abgrall-Barbry,6 Sophie Bourcelot,7 Jean-Louis Machavoine,8 Muriel Chomat-Neyraud,9 Olivier Gisserot,10 Rémi Largillier,11 Annick Le Rol,12 Frank Priou,13 Pierre Saltel,14 Claire Falandry15 1Clinique Mon Repos, Clinea, Marseille, France; 2Medical Oncology Unit, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Université Lyon 1, Pierre-Benite, France; 3Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; 4Palliative Unit, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Université Lyon 1, Pierre-Benite, France; 5Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; 6Tenon Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; 7Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; 8Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; 9Centre Hospitalier de la région d’Annecy, Pringy, France; 10Hôpital d’Instruction des Armées Sainte-Anne, Toulon, France; 11Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; 12Medical Oncology, Hôpital Perpétuel Secours, Levallois-Perret, France; 13Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Départemental Les Oudairies, La Roche-sur-Yon, France; 14Supportive Care Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; 15Geriatrics and Oncology Unit, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Université Lyon 1, Pierre-Bénite, France Background: Depression, a major outcome in cancer patients, is often evaluated by physicians relying on their clinical impressions rather than patient self-report. Our aim was to assess agreement between patient self-reported depression, oncologist assessment (OA), and psychiatric clinical interview (PCI) in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC).Methods: This analysis was a secondary endpoint of the Elderly Women AOC Trial 3 (EWOT3), designed to assess the impact of geriatric covariates, notably depression, on survival in patients older than 70 years of age. Depression was assessed using the Geriatric Depression Scale-30 (GDS), the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale, the distress thermometer, the mood thermometer, and OA. The interview guide for PCI was constructed from three validated scales: the GDS, the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, revised (DSM) criteria for depression were used as a gold standard.Results: Out of 109 patients enrolled at 21 centers, 99 (91%) completed all the assessments. Patient characteristics were: mean age 78, performance status ≥2: 47 (47%). Thirty six patients (36%) were identified as depressed by the PCI versus 15 (15%) identified by DSM. We found moderate agreement for depression identification between DSM and GDS (κ=0.508) and PCI (κ=0.431) and high agreement with MADRS (κ=0.663). We found low or no agreement between DSM with the other assessment strategies, including OA (κ=-0.043). Identification according to OA (yes/no) resulted in a false-negative rate of 87%. As a screening tool, GDS had the best sensitivity and specificity (94% and 80%, respectively).Conclusion: The use of validated tools, such as GDS, and collaboration between psychologists and oncologists are warranted to better identify emotional disorders in elderly women with AOC. Keywords: depression, elderly, cancer, screening, geriatric assessment
format	article
author	Rhondali W Freyer G Adam V Filbet M Derzelle M Abgrall-Barbry G Bourcelot S Machavoine JL Chomat-Neyraud M Gisserot O Largillier R Le Rol A Priou F Saltel P Falandry C
author_facet	Rhondali W Freyer G Adam V Filbet M Derzelle M Abgrall-Barbry G Bourcelot S Machavoine JL Chomat-Neyraud M Gisserot O Largillier R Le Rol A Priou F Saltel P Falandry C
author_sort	Rhondali W
title	Agreement for depression diagnosis between DSM-IV-TR criteria, three validated scales, oncologist assessment, and psychiatric clinical interview in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer
title_short	Agreement for depression diagnosis between DSM-IV-TR criteria, three validated scales, oncologist assessment, and psychiatric clinical interview in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer
title_full	Agreement for depression diagnosis between DSM-IV-TR criteria, three validated scales, oncologist assessment, and psychiatric clinical interview in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer
title_fullStr	Agreement for depression diagnosis between DSM-IV-TR criteria, three validated scales, oncologist assessment, and psychiatric clinical interview in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer
title_full_unstemmed	Agreement for depression diagnosis between DSM-IV-TR criteria, three validated scales, oncologist assessment, and psychiatric clinical interview in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer
title_sort	agreement for depression diagnosis between dsm-iv-tr criteria, three validated scales, oncologist assessment, and psychiatric clinical interview in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer
publisher	Dove Medical Press
publishDate	2015
url	https://doaj.org/article/e770c39c06ac4e90a4b6e5d4cd28f87e
work_keys_str_mv	AT rhondaliw agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer AT freyerg agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer AT adamv agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer AT filbetm agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer AT derzellem agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer AT abgrallbarbryg agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer AT bourcelots agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer AT machavoinejl agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer AT chomatneyraudm agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer AT gisseroto agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer AT largillierr agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer AT lerola agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer AT priouf agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer AT saltelp agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer AT falandryc agreementfordepressiondiagnosisbetweendsmivtrcriteriathreevalidatedscalesoncologistassessmentandpsychiatricclinicalinterviewinelderlypatientswithadvancedovariancancer
_version_	1718403651077144576
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:e770c39c06ac4e90a4b6e5d4cd28f87e2021-12-02T00:34:41ZAgreement for depression diagnosis between DSM-IV-TR criteria, three validated scales, oncologist assessment, and psychiatric clinical interview in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer1178-1998https://doaj.org/article/e770c39c06ac4e90a4b6e5d4cd28f87e2015-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/agreement-for-depression-diagnosis-between-dsm-iv-tr-criteria-three-va-peer-reviewed-article-CIAhttps://doaj.org/toc/1178-1998Wadih Rhondali,1 Gilles Freyer,2 Virginie Adam,3 Marilène Filbet,4 Martine Derzelle,5 Gaelle Abgrall-Barbry,6 Sophie Bourcelot,7 Jean-Louis Machavoine,8 Muriel Chomat-Neyraud,9 Olivier Gisserot,10 Rémi Largillier,11 Annick Le Rol,12 Frank Priou,13 Pierre Saltel,14 Claire Falandry15 1Clinique Mon Repos, Clinea, Marseille, France; 2Medical Oncology Unit, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Université Lyon 1, Pierre-Benite, France; 3Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; 4Palliative Unit, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Université Lyon 1, Pierre-Benite, France; 5Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France; 6Tenon Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; 7Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; 8Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; 9Centre Hospitalier de la région d’Annecy, Pringy, France; 10Hôpital d’Instruction des Armées Sainte-Anne, Toulon, France; 11Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France; 12Medical Oncology, Hôpital Perpétuel Secours, Levallois-Perret, France; 13Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Départemental Les Oudairies, La Roche-sur-Yon, France; 14Supportive Care Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; 15Geriatrics and Oncology Unit, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Université Lyon 1, Pierre-Bénite, France Background: Depression, a major outcome in cancer patients, is often evaluated by physicians relying on their clinical impressions rather than patient self-report. Our aim was to assess agreement between patient self-reported depression, oncologist assessment (OA), and psychiatric clinical interview (PCI) in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC).Methods: This analysis was a secondary endpoint of the Elderly Women AOC Trial 3 (EWOT3), designed to assess the impact of geriatric covariates, notably depression, on survival in patients older than 70 years of age. Depression was assessed using the Geriatric Depression Scale-30 (GDS), the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale, the distress thermometer, the mood thermometer, and OA. The interview guide for PCI was constructed from three validated scales: the GDS, the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, revised (DSM) criteria for depression were used as a gold standard.Results: Out of 109 patients enrolled at 21 centers, 99 (91%) completed all the assessments. Patient characteristics were: mean age 78, performance status ≥2: 47 (47%). Thirty six patients (36%) were identified as depressed by the PCI versus 15 (15%) identified by DSM. We found moderate agreement for depression identification between DSM and GDS (κ=0.508) and PCI (κ=0.431) and high agreement with MADRS (κ=0.663). We found low or no agreement between DSM with the other assessment strategies, including OA (κ=-0.043). Identification according to OA (yes/no) resulted in a false-negative rate of 87%. As a screening tool, GDS had the best sensitivity and specificity (94% and 80%, respectively).Conclusion: The use of validated tools, such as GDS, and collaboration between psychologists and oncologists are warranted to better identify emotional disorders in elderly women with AOC. Keywords: depression, elderly, cancer, screening, geriatric assessmentRhondali WFreyer GAdam VFilbet MDerzelle MAbgrall-Barbry GBourcelot SMachavoine JLChomat-Neyraud MGisserot OLargillier RLe Rol APriou FSaltel PFalandry CDove Medical Pressarticledepressionelderlycancerscreeninggeriatric assessmentGeriatricsRC952-954.6ENClinical Interventions in Aging, Vol Volume 10, Pp 1155-1162 (2015)

Agreement for depression diagnosis between DSM-IV-TR criteria, three validated scales, oncologist assessment, and psychiatric clinical interview in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer

Ejemplares similares