Feasibility of two screen media reduction interventions: Results from the SCREENS pilot trial.

<h4>Background</h4>Advancements in screen media devices has transformed the way families engage with screen media. Although these modern devices offer many opportunities, e.g. communication and research online, an in-depth understanding of how these devices affect our health, is lacking....

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Martin G B Rasmussen, Jesper Pedersen, Line Grønholt Olesen, Peter Lund Kristensen, Jan Christian Brønd, Anders Grøntved
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/e78f941dea6e40e68933bbd827f50681
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:e78f941dea6e40e68933bbd827f50681
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:e78f941dea6e40e68933bbd827f506812021-12-02T20:13:09ZFeasibility of two screen media reduction interventions: Results from the SCREENS pilot trial.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0259657https://doaj.org/article/e78f941dea6e40e68933bbd827f506812021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259657https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>Advancements in screen media devices has transformed the way families engage with screen media. Although these modern devices offer many opportunities, e.g. communication and research online, an in-depth understanding of how these devices affect our health, is lacking. Before a definite randomized controlled trial, the SCREENS pilot study was conducted to assess compliance to and feasibility of two interventions, a measurement protocol, and a survey-based recruitment strategy. Also, the potential of the interventions to impact leisure time spent non-sedentary in children six-to-ten years of age was explored.<h4>Methods</h4>Families (N = 12) were recruited through a population-based survey sent out in October of 2018 to adults (N = 1,675) in the Municipality of Middelfart, Denmark. Families were randomized to one of two two-week interventions; an Evening Restriction intervention (no screen media use after six pm) and a General Restrict intervention (limit entertainment-based screen media to three hours/week/person). Intervention compliance was assessed objectively by measuring household TV usage, smartphone and tablet activity via an application, and via screen media diaries. During baseline and follow-up, as part of larger protocol, family members wore two triaxial accelerometers for seven consecutive days. The potential of the interventions to impact non-sedentary time was explored based on means and standard errors (SEs).<h4>Results</h4>Despite almost 85% and 75% reductions in leisure screen media use 0% and 50% of families were compliant in the Evening Restrict group and General Restrict group, respectively, based on strict a priori criteria. Participant feedback indicated that the General Restrict intervention generally was feasibly. Compliance to the accelerometry wear protocol was high (median non-wear was <1 hour/week). Moreover, the recruitment strategy was implemented and was feasible. The General restrict intervention might increase children's non-sedentary time (mean (SE): 36.6 (23) min/day, N = 6).<h4>Conclusions</h4>The General Restriction intervention, the accelerometer wear protocol and recruitment strategy, appeared feasible.<h4>Trial registration</h4>NCT03788525 at https://clinicaltrials.gov [Retrospectively registered; 27th of December, 2018].Martin G B RasmussenJesper PedersenLine Grønholt OlesenPeter Lund KristensenJan Christian BrøndAnders GrøntvedPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 11, p e0259657 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Martin G B Rasmussen Jesper Pedersen Line Grønholt Olesen Peter Lund Kristensen Jan Christian Brønd Anders Grøntved Feasibility of two screen media reduction interventions: Results from the SCREENS pilot trial.
description	<h4>Background</h4>Advancements in screen media devices has transformed the way families engage with screen media. Although these modern devices offer many opportunities, e.g. communication and research online, an in-depth understanding of how these devices affect our health, is lacking. Before a definite randomized controlled trial, the SCREENS pilot study was conducted to assess compliance to and feasibility of two interventions, a measurement protocol, and a survey-based recruitment strategy. Also, the potential of the interventions to impact leisure time spent non-sedentary in children six-to-ten years of age was explored.<h4>Methods</h4>Families (N = 12) were recruited through a population-based survey sent out in October of 2018 to adults (N = 1,675) in the Municipality of Middelfart, Denmark. Families were randomized to one of two two-week interventions; an Evening Restriction intervention (no screen media use after six pm) and a General Restrict intervention (limit entertainment-based screen media to three hours/week/person). Intervention compliance was assessed objectively by measuring household TV usage, smartphone and tablet activity via an application, and via screen media diaries. During baseline and follow-up, as part of larger protocol, family members wore two triaxial accelerometers for seven consecutive days. The potential of the interventions to impact non-sedentary time was explored based on means and standard errors (SEs).<h4>Results</h4>Despite almost 85% and 75% reductions in leisure screen media use 0% and 50% of families were compliant in the Evening Restrict group and General Restrict group, respectively, based on strict a priori criteria. Participant feedback indicated that the General Restrict intervention generally was feasibly. Compliance to the accelerometry wear protocol was high (median non-wear was <1 hour/week). Moreover, the recruitment strategy was implemented and was feasible. The General restrict intervention might increase children's non-sedentary time (mean (SE): 36.6 (23) min/day, N = 6).<h4>Conclusions</h4>The General Restriction intervention, the accelerometer wear protocol and recruitment strategy, appeared feasible.<h4>Trial registration</h4>NCT03788525 at https://clinicaltrials.gov [Retrospectively registered; 27th of December, 2018].
format	article
author	Martin G B Rasmussen Jesper Pedersen Line Grønholt Olesen Peter Lund Kristensen Jan Christian Brønd Anders Grøntved
author_facet	Martin G B Rasmussen Jesper Pedersen Line Grønholt Olesen Peter Lund Kristensen Jan Christian Brønd Anders Grøntved
author_sort	Martin G B Rasmussen
title	Feasibility of two screen media reduction interventions: Results from the SCREENS pilot trial.
title_short	Feasibility of two screen media reduction interventions: Results from the SCREENS pilot trial.
title_full	Feasibility of two screen media reduction interventions: Results from the SCREENS pilot trial.
title_fullStr	Feasibility of two screen media reduction interventions: Results from the SCREENS pilot trial.
title_full_unstemmed	Feasibility of two screen media reduction interventions: Results from the SCREENS pilot trial.
title_sort	feasibility of two screen media reduction interventions: results from the screens pilot trial.
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/e78f941dea6e40e68933bbd827f50681
work_keys_str_mv	AT martingbrasmussen feasibilityoftwoscreenmediareductioninterventionsresultsfromthescreenspilottrial AT jesperpedersen feasibilityoftwoscreenmediareductioninterventionsresultsfromthescreenspilottrial AT linegrønholtolesen feasibilityoftwoscreenmediareductioninterventionsresultsfromthescreenspilottrial AT peterlundkristensen feasibilityoftwoscreenmediareductioninterventionsresultsfromthescreenspilottrial AT janchristianbrønd feasibilityoftwoscreenmediareductioninterventionsresultsfromthescreenspilottrial AT andersgrøntved feasibilityoftwoscreenmediareductioninterventionsresultsfromthescreenspilottrial
_version_	1718374856736636928

Feasibility of two screen media reduction interventions: Results from the SCREENS pilot trial.

Ejemplares similares