A Co-Design Process Microanalysis: Stages and Facilitators of an Inquiry-Based and Technology-Enhanced Learning Scenario

This paper presents a case study of the co-design process for an online course on Sustainable Development (Degree in Tourism) involving the teacher, two students, and the project researchers. The co-design process was founded on an inquiry-based and technology-enhanced model that takes shape in a se...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elena Barbera, Iolanda Garcia, Marc Fuertes-Alpiste
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Athabasca University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e7ae65a0304747ceaf6a066efd3c927a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e7ae65a0304747ceaf6a066efd3c927a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e7ae65a0304747ceaf6a066efd3c927a2021-12-02T17:15:37ZA Co-Design Process Microanalysis: Stages and Facilitators of an Inquiry-Based and Technology-Enhanced Learning Scenario10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.28051492-3831https://doaj.org/article/e7ae65a0304747ceaf6a066efd3c927a2017-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2805https://doaj.org/toc/1492-3831This paper presents a case study of the co-design process for an online course on Sustainable Development (Degree in Tourism) involving the teacher, two students, and the project researchers. The co-design process was founded on an inquiry-based and technology-enhanced model that takes shape in a set of design principles. The research had two main objectives. Firstly, to identify the moments of change that occur during the co-design process and secondly, to describe the causes and agents that motivate them. This study applied design-based research methodology and used a qualitative approach to collect, analyse, and interpret data. The results show that the co-design methodology led to moderate changes consisting of the progressive construction and refinement of the activities, seeking a sense of continuum throughout by including students’ collaboration. The findings also reveal the main role of each of the actors involved. Thus, the teacher focused on basic instructional design related aspects while students focused on improving the use of resources and learning aids. Researchers helped them to embody and achieve the proposed changes and also acted as mediators of pedagogical concepts and vocabulary. CompendiumLD software was a helpful tool to graphically represent and share the prototyping of the activities and to help analyse the design process. Elena BarberaIolanda GarciaMarc Fuertes-AlpisteAthabasca University Pressarticlelearning co-designparticipatory designlearning scenariosinquiry-based learningtechnology-enhanced learningSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691ENInternational Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Vol 18, Iss 6 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic learning co-design
participatory design
learning scenarios
inquiry-based learning
technology-enhanced learning
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
spellingShingle learning co-design
participatory design
learning scenarios
inquiry-based learning
technology-enhanced learning
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Elena Barbera
Iolanda Garcia
Marc Fuertes-Alpiste
A Co-Design Process Microanalysis: Stages and Facilitators of an Inquiry-Based and Technology-Enhanced Learning Scenario
description This paper presents a case study of the co-design process for an online course on Sustainable Development (Degree in Tourism) involving the teacher, two students, and the project researchers. The co-design process was founded on an inquiry-based and technology-enhanced model that takes shape in a set of design principles. The research had two main objectives. Firstly, to identify the moments of change that occur during the co-design process and secondly, to describe the causes and agents that motivate them. This study applied design-based research methodology and used a qualitative approach to collect, analyse, and interpret data. The results show that the co-design methodology led to moderate changes consisting of the progressive construction and refinement of the activities, seeking a sense of continuum throughout by including students’ collaboration. The findings also reveal the main role of each of the actors involved. Thus, the teacher focused on basic instructional design related aspects while students focused on improving the use of resources and learning aids. Researchers helped them to embody and achieve the proposed changes and also acted as mediators of pedagogical concepts and vocabulary. CompendiumLD software was a helpful tool to graphically represent and share the prototyping of the activities and to help analyse the design process.
format article
author Elena Barbera
Iolanda Garcia
Marc Fuertes-Alpiste
author_facet Elena Barbera
Iolanda Garcia
Marc Fuertes-Alpiste
author_sort Elena Barbera
title A Co-Design Process Microanalysis: Stages and Facilitators of an Inquiry-Based and Technology-Enhanced Learning Scenario
title_short A Co-Design Process Microanalysis: Stages and Facilitators of an Inquiry-Based and Technology-Enhanced Learning Scenario
title_full A Co-Design Process Microanalysis: Stages and Facilitators of an Inquiry-Based and Technology-Enhanced Learning Scenario
title_fullStr A Co-Design Process Microanalysis: Stages and Facilitators of an Inquiry-Based and Technology-Enhanced Learning Scenario
title_full_unstemmed A Co-Design Process Microanalysis: Stages and Facilitators of an Inquiry-Based and Technology-Enhanced Learning Scenario
title_sort co-design process microanalysis: stages and facilitators of an inquiry-based and technology-enhanced learning scenario
publisher Athabasca University Press
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/e7ae65a0304747ceaf6a066efd3c927a
work_keys_str_mv AT elenabarbera acodesignprocessmicroanalysisstagesandfacilitatorsofaninquirybasedandtechnologyenhancedlearningscenario
AT iolandagarcia acodesignprocessmicroanalysisstagesandfacilitatorsofaninquirybasedandtechnologyenhancedlearningscenario
AT marcfuertesalpiste acodesignprocessmicroanalysisstagesandfacilitatorsofaninquirybasedandtechnologyenhancedlearningscenario
AT elenabarbera codesignprocessmicroanalysisstagesandfacilitatorsofaninquirybasedandtechnologyenhancedlearningscenario
AT iolandagarcia codesignprocessmicroanalysisstagesandfacilitatorsofaninquirybasedandtechnologyenhancedlearningscenario
AT marcfuertesalpiste codesignprocessmicroanalysisstagesandfacilitatorsofaninquirybasedandtechnologyenhancedlearningscenario
_version_ 1718381294278148096