Crítica literária e sociedade: como representa o texto literário?

This article discusses, from a theoretical point of view, the paradoxical relationship between literature and society. On the one hand, it criticizes a reading of literature with a sociologizing bias disseminated by the culturalist critique, but tries to retrieve positive aspects mentioned by aut...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Juan Pablo Chiappara
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	PT
Publicado:	Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) 2006
Materias:	literature representation society Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/e7b7642f3fae46a58da5b93b32d174e8
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:e7b7642f3fae46a58da5b93b32d174e8
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:e7b7642f3fae46a58da5b93b32d174e82021-11-11T15:41:57ZCrítica literária e sociedade: como representa o texto literário?2177-6229https://doaj.org/article/e7b7642f3fae46a58da5b93b32d174e82006-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=93842305https://doaj.org/toc/2177-6229This article discusses, from a theoretical point of view, the paradoxical relationship between literature and society. On the one hand, it criticizes a reading of literature with a sociologizing bias disseminated by the culturalist critique, but tries to retrieve positive aspects mentioned by authors such as Mignolo, Moreiras, Polar and Bhabba. On the other hand, it proposes a reading of literarature that asks about what it means to represent when one is in the literary realm. Thus, it poses the idea of thinking on the basis of the concept of paratopia, suggested by Maingueneau in the early 90s in the French Analysis of Discourse. In Cultural Studies, some concepts by Homi Bhabba are reconsidered, as they offer a theoretical point of view aligned with an idea of representation that does not take for granted a smooth or simplified passage from the literary text to the social or from the social to the text. Nowadays the relationship between society and literary discourse remains open. The 20th century has tried various theoretical solutions: literary structuralism believed in immanence, a post-structuralism crossed immanence and culture. Later on a certain literary critique seems to emphasize the documental aspect of literary works, giving up their aesthetical character and the differentiated conditions of social functioning that it creates. So, this article ends up being an invitation to reflect on and dialogue with thinkers from other areas of social studies who intend to deal with literary texts in their history, politics, sociology and culture works and who, with their theoretical background and practices, will be able to produce new reflections on the issue raised.Juan Pablo ChiapparaUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)articleliteraturerepresentationsocietySocial SciencesHSocial sciences (General)H1-99PTCiências Sociais Unisinos, Vol 42, Iss 3, Pp 189-198 (2006)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	PT
topic	literature representation society Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99
spellingShingle	literature representation society Social Sciences H Social sciences (General) H1-99 Juan Pablo Chiappara Crítica literária e sociedade: como representa o texto literário?
description	This article discusses, from a theoretical point of view, the paradoxical relationship between literature and society. On the one hand, it criticizes a reading of literature with a sociologizing bias disseminated by the culturalist critique, but tries to retrieve positive aspects mentioned by authors such as Mignolo, Moreiras, Polar and Bhabba. On the other hand, it proposes a reading of literarature that asks about what it means to represent when one is in the literary realm. Thus, it poses the idea of thinking on the basis of the concept of paratopia, suggested by Maingueneau in the early 90s in the French Analysis of Discourse. In Cultural Studies, some concepts by Homi Bhabba are reconsidered, as they offer a theoretical point of view aligned with an idea of representation that does not take for granted a smooth or simplified passage from the literary text to the social or from the social to the text. Nowadays the relationship between society and literary discourse remains open. The 20th century has tried various theoretical solutions: literary structuralism believed in immanence, a post-structuralism crossed immanence and culture. Later on a certain literary critique seems to emphasize the documental aspect of literary works, giving up their aesthetical character and the differentiated conditions of social functioning that it creates. So, this article ends up being an invitation to reflect on and dialogue with thinkers from other areas of social studies who intend to deal with literary texts in their history, politics, sociology and culture works and who, with their theoretical background and practices, will be able to produce new reflections on the issue raised.
format	article
author	Juan Pablo Chiappara
author_facet	Juan Pablo Chiappara
author_sort	Juan Pablo Chiappara
title	Crítica literária e sociedade: como representa o texto literário?
title_short	Crítica literária e sociedade: como representa o texto literário?
title_full	Crítica literária e sociedade: como representa o texto literário?
title_fullStr	Crítica literária e sociedade: como representa o texto literário?
title_full_unstemmed	Crítica literária e sociedade: como representa o texto literário?
title_sort	crítica literária e sociedade: como representa o texto literário?
publisher	Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)
publishDate	2006
url	https://doaj.org/article/e7b7642f3fae46a58da5b93b32d174e8
work_keys_str_mv	AT juanpablochiappara criticaliterariaesociedadecomorepresentaotextoliterario
_version_	1718434186434445312

Crítica literária e sociedade: como representa o texto literário?

Ejemplares similares