Comparison of two extraction methods for the determination of organolead compounds using sodium tetrapropylborate as derivatization reagent

Two extraction methods of accelerate solvent extraction (ASE) and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) were used to the extraction of trimethyl lead (TML) and triethyl lead (TEL), which were detected by gas chromatographer coupled with mass spectrometry. Sodium tetrapropylborate, as the derivatizati...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu Zhang, Huanhuan Yang, Yan Cui, Zhen Ren, Ruirui Sun
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e7c6f55a88fd4cb69c863236cafc7f0e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e7c6f55a88fd4cb69c863236cafc7f0e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e7c6f55a88fd4cb69c863236cafc7f0e2021-11-26T04:42:06ZComparison of two extraction methods for the determination of organolead compounds using sodium tetrapropylborate as derivatization reagent2666-916110.1016/j.resenv.2021.100035https://doaj.org/article/e7c6f55a88fd4cb69c863236cafc7f0e2021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916121000220https://doaj.org/toc/2666-9161Two extraction methods of accelerate solvent extraction (ASE) and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) were used to the extraction of trimethyl lead (TML) and triethyl lead (TEL), which were detected by gas chromatographer coupled with mass spectrometry. Sodium tetrapropylborate, as the derivatization reagent, was applied for the detection of gas chromatography. The recovery rate of ASE were about 88.2% (TML) and 86.4% (TEL) with 15 min consuming. The recovery rate of SFE were about 93.7% (TML) and 94.1% (TEL) with 40 min consuming. Two extraction methods of ASE and SFE were optimized, which were also analyzed in recovery, repeatability, accuracy, limit of detection (LOD) and other aspect. Both ASE and SFE exhibited rational recovery efficiency. The established methods were also applied to the real soil samples. SFE had better extraction effect according to time consumption, recovery rate, LOD and accuracy. However, ASE had more advantages in automated extraction, which could be applied to the pretreatment of large amounts of samples.Xu ZhangHuanhuan YangYan CuiZhen RenRuirui SunElsevierarticleAccelerated solvent extractionSupercritical fluid extractionSodium tetrapropylborateTrimethyl leadTriethyl leadEnvironmental sciencesGE1-350Environmental effects of industries and plantsTD194-195ENResources, Environment and Sustainability, Vol 6, Iss , Pp 100035- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Accelerated solvent extraction
Supercritical fluid extraction
Sodium tetrapropylborate
Trimethyl lead
Triethyl lead
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Environmental effects of industries and plants
TD194-195
spellingShingle Accelerated solvent extraction
Supercritical fluid extraction
Sodium tetrapropylborate
Trimethyl lead
Triethyl lead
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Environmental effects of industries and plants
TD194-195
Xu Zhang
Huanhuan Yang
Yan Cui
Zhen Ren
Ruirui Sun
Comparison of two extraction methods for the determination of organolead compounds using sodium tetrapropylborate as derivatization reagent
description Two extraction methods of accelerate solvent extraction (ASE) and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) were used to the extraction of trimethyl lead (TML) and triethyl lead (TEL), which were detected by gas chromatographer coupled with mass spectrometry. Sodium tetrapropylborate, as the derivatization reagent, was applied for the detection of gas chromatography. The recovery rate of ASE were about 88.2% (TML) and 86.4% (TEL) with 15 min consuming. The recovery rate of SFE were about 93.7% (TML) and 94.1% (TEL) with 40 min consuming. Two extraction methods of ASE and SFE were optimized, which were also analyzed in recovery, repeatability, accuracy, limit of detection (LOD) and other aspect. Both ASE and SFE exhibited rational recovery efficiency. The established methods were also applied to the real soil samples. SFE had better extraction effect according to time consumption, recovery rate, LOD and accuracy. However, ASE had more advantages in automated extraction, which could be applied to the pretreatment of large amounts of samples.
format article
author Xu Zhang
Huanhuan Yang
Yan Cui
Zhen Ren
Ruirui Sun
author_facet Xu Zhang
Huanhuan Yang
Yan Cui
Zhen Ren
Ruirui Sun
author_sort Xu Zhang
title Comparison of two extraction methods for the determination of organolead compounds using sodium tetrapropylborate as derivatization reagent
title_short Comparison of two extraction methods for the determination of organolead compounds using sodium tetrapropylborate as derivatization reagent
title_full Comparison of two extraction methods for the determination of organolead compounds using sodium tetrapropylborate as derivatization reagent
title_fullStr Comparison of two extraction methods for the determination of organolead compounds using sodium tetrapropylborate as derivatization reagent
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two extraction methods for the determination of organolead compounds using sodium tetrapropylborate as derivatization reagent
title_sort comparison of two extraction methods for the determination of organolead compounds using sodium tetrapropylborate as derivatization reagent
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/e7c6f55a88fd4cb69c863236cafc7f0e
work_keys_str_mv AT xuzhang comparisonoftwoextractionmethodsforthedeterminationoforganoleadcompoundsusingsodiumtetrapropylborateasderivatizationreagent
AT huanhuanyang comparisonoftwoextractionmethodsforthedeterminationoforganoleadcompoundsusingsodiumtetrapropylborateasderivatizationreagent
AT yancui comparisonoftwoextractionmethodsforthedeterminationoforganoleadcompoundsusingsodiumtetrapropylborateasderivatizationreagent
AT zhenren comparisonoftwoextractionmethodsforthedeterminationoforganoleadcompoundsusingsodiumtetrapropylborateasderivatizationreagent
AT ruiruisun comparisonoftwoextractionmethodsforthedeterminationoforganoleadcompoundsusingsodiumtetrapropylborateasderivatizationreagent
_version_ 1718409815318855680