Relationship between Nutritional Screening Tools and GLIM in Complicated IBD Requiring Surgery

Background: Accurate identification of malnutrition and preoperative nutritional care in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) surgery is mandatory. There is no validated nutritional screening tool for IBD patients. We developed a novel nutritional screening tool for IBD patients requiring surgery and co...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Camilla Fiorindi, Gabriele Dragoni, Stefano Scaringi, Fabio Staderini, Anita Nannoni, Ferdinando Ficari, Francesco Giudici
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
IBD
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e7f6b6fb2b6b42a68b915ea8d3a3eb50
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e7f6b6fb2b6b42a68b915ea8d3a3eb50
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e7f6b6fb2b6b42a68b915ea8d3a3eb502021-11-25T18:35:05ZRelationship between Nutritional Screening Tools and GLIM in Complicated IBD Requiring Surgery10.3390/nu131138992072-6643https://doaj.org/article/e7f6b6fb2b6b42a68b915ea8d3a3eb502021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/11/3899https://doaj.org/toc/2072-6643Background: Accurate identification of malnutrition and preoperative nutritional care in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) surgery is mandatory. There is no validated nutritional screening tool for IBD patients. We developed a novel nutritional screening tool for IBD patients requiring surgery and compared it with other tools. Methods: we included 62 consecutive patients scheduled for elective surgery. The IBD Nutritional Screening tool (NS-IBD) was developed to screen patients for further comprehensive assessment. NRS-2002, MUST, MST, MIRT, SaskIBD-NR are compared with the new test. All screening tests were subsequently related to new GLIM criteria. Results: according to GLIM criteria, 25 (40%) IBD patients were malnourished (15 CD and 10 UC, 33% vs. 63%, <i>p</i> = 0.036). Stage 1 malnutrition was reported in ten patients, while stage 2 was detected in 15 patients. The comparison of each nutritional risk tool with GLIM criteria showed sensitivity of 0.52, 0.6, 0.6, 0.84, 0.84 and 0.92 for SASKIBD-NR, MUST, MST, NRS-2002, MIRT, and the new NS-IBD, respectively. Conclusions: in IBD, currently adopted nutritional screening tools are characterized by a low sensitivity when malnutrition diagnosis is performed with recent GLIM criteria. Our proposed tool to detect malnutrition performed the best in detecting patients that may require nutritional assessment and preoperative intervention.Camilla FiorindiGabriele DragoniStefano ScaringiFabio StaderiniAnita NannoniFerdinando FicariFrancesco GiudiciMDPI AGarticleIBDGLIMsurgerynutritional screening toolmalnutritionNutrition. Foods and food supplyTX341-641ENNutrients, Vol 13, Iss 3899, p 3899 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic IBD
GLIM
surgery
nutritional screening tool
malnutrition
Nutrition. Foods and food supply
TX341-641
spellingShingle IBD
GLIM
surgery
nutritional screening tool
malnutrition
Nutrition. Foods and food supply
TX341-641
Camilla Fiorindi
Gabriele Dragoni
Stefano Scaringi
Fabio Staderini
Anita Nannoni
Ferdinando Ficari
Francesco Giudici
Relationship between Nutritional Screening Tools and GLIM in Complicated IBD Requiring Surgery
description Background: Accurate identification of malnutrition and preoperative nutritional care in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) surgery is mandatory. There is no validated nutritional screening tool for IBD patients. We developed a novel nutritional screening tool for IBD patients requiring surgery and compared it with other tools. Methods: we included 62 consecutive patients scheduled for elective surgery. The IBD Nutritional Screening tool (NS-IBD) was developed to screen patients for further comprehensive assessment. NRS-2002, MUST, MST, MIRT, SaskIBD-NR are compared with the new test. All screening tests were subsequently related to new GLIM criteria. Results: according to GLIM criteria, 25 (40%) IBD patients were malnourished (15 CD and 10 UC, 33% vs. 63%, <i>p</i> = 0.036). Stage 1 malnutrition was reported in ten patients, while stage 2 was detected in 15 patients. The comparison of each nutritional risk tool with GLIM criteria showed sensitivity of 0.52, 0.6, 0.6, 0.84, 0.84 and 0.92 for SASKIBD-NR, MUST, MST, NRS-2002, MIRT, and the new NS-IBD, respectively. Conclusions: in IBD, currently adopted nutritional screening tools are characterized by a low sensitivity when malnutrition diagnosis is performed with recent GLIM criteria. Our proposed tool to detect malnutrition performed the best in detecting patients that may require nutritional assessment and preoperative intervention.
format article
author Camilla Fiorindi
Gabriele Dragoni
Stefano Scaringi
Fabio Staderini
Anita Nannoni
Ferdinando Ficari
Francesco Giudici
author_facet Camilla Fiorindi
Gabriele Dragoni
Stefano Scaringi
Fabio Staderini
Anita Nannoni
Ferdinando Ficari
Francesco Giudici
author_sort Camilla Fiorindi
title Relationship between Nutritional Screening Tools and GLIM in Complicated IBD Requiring Surgery
title_short Relationship between Nutritional Screening Tools and GLIM in Complicated IBD Requiring Surgery
title_full Relationship between Nutritional Screening Tools and GLIM in Complicated IBD Requiring Surgery
title_fullStr Relationship between Nutritional Screening Tools and GLIM in Complicated IBD Requiring Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between Nutritional Screening Tools and GLIM in Complicated IBD Requiring Surgery
title_sort relationship between nutritional screening tools and glim in complicated ibd requiring surgery
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/e7f6b6fb2b6b42a68b915ea8d3a3eb50
work_keys_str_mv AT camillafiorindi relationshipbetweennutritionalscreeningtoolsandglimincomplicatedibdrequiringsurgery
AT gabrieledragoni relationshipbetweennutritionalscreeningtoolsandglimincomplicatedibdrequiringsurgery
AT stefanoscaringi relationshipbetweennutritionalscreeningtoolsandglimincomplicatedibdrequiringsurgery
AT fabiostaderini relationshipbetweennutritionalscreeningtoolsandglimincomplicatedibdrequiringsurgery
AT anitanannoni relationshipbetweennutritionalscreeningtoolsandglimincomplicatedibdrequiringsurgery
AT ferdinandoficari relationshipbetweennutritionalscreeningtoolsandglimincomplicatedibdrequiringsurgery
AT francescogiudici relationshipbetweennutritionalscreeningtoolsandglimincomplicatedibdrequiringsurgery
_version_ 1718410985481437184