Development of an efficient search filter to retrieve systematic reviews from PubMed

Objective: Locating systematic reviews is essential for clinicians and researchers when creating or updating reviews and for decision-making in health care. This study aimed to develop a search filter for retrieving systematic reviews that improves upon the performance of the PubMed systematic revie...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: José Antonio Salvador-Oliván, Gonzalo Marco-Cuenca, Rosario Arquero-Avilés
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2021
Materias:
Z
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/e83a7acfea2b4e569d38fd72a3c05795
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:e83a7acfea2b4e569d38fd72a3c05795
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:e83a7acfea2b4e569d38fd72a3c057952021-11-22T20:41:00ZDevelopment of an efficient search filter to retrieve systematic reviews from PubMed1536-50501558-943910.5195/jmla.2021.1223https://doaj.org/article/e83a7acfea2b4e569d38fd72a3c057952021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jmla.pitt.edu/ojs/jmla/article/view/1223https://doaj.org/toc/1536-5050https://doaj.org/toc/1558-9439Objective: Locating systematic reviews is essential for clinicians and researchers when creating or updating reviews and for decision-making in health care. This study aimed to develop a search filter for retrieving systematic reviews that improves upon the performance of the PubMed systematic review search filter. Methods: Search terms were identified from abstracts of reviews published in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the titles of articles indexed as systematic reviews in PubMed. Both the precision of the candidate terms and the number of systematic reviews retrieved from PubMed were evaluated after excluding the subset of articles retrieved by the PubMed systematic review filter. Terms that achieved a precision greater than 70% and relevant publication types indexed with MeSH terms were included in the filter search strategy. Results: The search strategy used in our filter added specific terms not included in PubMed’s systematic review filter and achieved a 61.3% increase in the number of retrieved articles that are potential systematic reviews. Moreover, it achieved an average precision that is likely greater than 80%. Conclusions: The developed search filter will enable users to identify more systematic reviews from PubMed than the PubMed systematic review filter with high precision.José Antonio Salvador-OlivánGonzalo Marco-CuencaRosario Arquero-AvilésUniversity Library System, University of Pittsburgharticlesearch filtersystematic reviewspubmedinformation retrievalsearch strategiesBibliography. Library science. Information resourcesZMedicineRENJournal of the Medical Library Association, Vol 109, Iss 4 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic search filter
systematic reviews
pubmed
information retrieval
search strategies
Bibliography. Library science. Information resources
Z
Medicine
R
spellingShingle search filter
systematic reviews
pubmed
information retrieval
search strategies
Bibliography. Library science. Information resources
Z
Medicine
R
José Antonio Salvador-Oliván
Gonzalo Marco-Cuenca
Rosario Arquero-Avilés
Development of an efficient search filter to retrieve systematic reviews from PubMed
description Objective: Locating systematic reviews is essential for clinicians and researchers when creating or updating reviews and for decision-making in health care. This study aimed to develop a search filter for retrieving systematic reviews that improves upon the performance of the PubMed systematic review search filter. Methods: Search terms were identified from abstracts of reviews published in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the titles of articles indexed as systematic reviews in PubMed. Both the precision of the candidate terms and the number of systematic reviews retrieved from PubMed were evaluated after excluding the subset of articles retrieved by the PubMed systematic review filter. Terms that achieved a precision greater than 70% and relevant publication types indexed with MeSH terms were included in the filter search strategy. Results: The search strategy used in our filter added specific terms not included in PubMed’s systematic review filter and achieved a 61.3% increase in the number of retrieved articles that are potential systematic reviews. Moreover, it achieved an average precision that is likely greater than 80%. Conclusions: The developed search filter will enable users to identify more systematic reviews from PubMed than the PubMed systematic review filter with high precision.
format article
author José Antonio Salvador-Oliván
Gonzalo Marco-Cuenca
Rosario Arquero-Avilés
author_facet José Antonio Salvador-Oliván
Gonzalo Marco-Cuenca
Rosario Arquero-Avilés
author_sort José Antonio Salvador-Oliván
title Development of an efficient search filter to retrieve systematic reviews from PubMed
title_short Development of an efficient search filter to retrieve systematic reviews from PubMed
title_full Development of an efficient search filter to retrieve systematic reviews from PubMed
title_fullStr Development of an efficient search filter to retrieve systematic reviews from PubMed
title_full_unstemmed Development of an efficient search filter to retrieve systematic reviews from PubMed
title_sort development of an efficient search filter to retrieve systematic reviews from pubmed
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/e83a7acfea2b4e569d38fd72a3c05795
work_keys_str_mv AT joseantoniosalvadorolivan developmentofanefficientsearchfiltertoretrievesystematicreviewsfrompubmed
AT gonzalomarcocuenca developmentofanefficientsearchfiltertoretrievesystematicreviewsfrompubmed
AT rosarioarqueroaviles developmentofanefficientsearchfiltertoretrievesystematicreviewsfrompubmed
_version_ 1718417410346713088