Assessing Deception in Questionnaire Surveys With Eye-Tracking

Deceit often occurs in questionnaire surveys, which leads to the misreporting of data and poor reliability. The purpose of this study is to explore whether eye-tracking could contribute to the detection of deception in questionnaire surveys, and whether the eye behaviors that appeared in instructed...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Xinyue Fang, Yiteng Sun, Xinyi Zheng, Xinrong Wang, Xuemei Deng, Mei Wang
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:	lie detection eye behavior questionnaire surveys deception eye-tracking Psychology BF1-990
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/e851c10e42ae40fe897bd59887287483
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:e851c10e42ae40fe897bd59887287483
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:e851c10e42ae40fe897bd598872874832021-11-22T07:29:09ZAssessing Deception in Questionnaire Surveys With Eye-Tracking1664-107810.3389/fpsyg.2021.774961https://doaj.org/article/e851c10e42ae40fe897bd598872874832021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.774961/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/1664-1078Deceit often occurs in questionnaire surveys, which leads to the misreporting of data and poor reliability. The purpose of this study is to explore whether eye-tracking could contribute to the detection of deception in questionnaire surveys, and whether the eye behaviors that appeared in instructed lying still exist in spontaneous lying. Two studies were conducted to explore eye movement behaviors in instructed and spontaneous lying conditions. The results showed that pupil size and fixation behaviors are both reliable indicators to detect lies in questionnaire surveys. Blink and saccade behaviors do not seem to predict deception. Deception resulted in increased pupil size, fixation count and duration. Meanwhile, respondents focused on different areas of the questionnaire when lying versus telling the truth. Furthermore, in the actual deception situation, the linear support vector machine (SVM) deception classifier achieved an accuracy of 74.09%. In sum, this study indicates the eye-tracking signatures of lying are not restricted to instructed deception, demonstrates the potential of using eye-tracking to detect deception in questionnaire surveys, and contributes to the questionnaire surveys of sensitive issues.Xinyue FangYiteng SunXinyi ZhengXinrong WangXuemei DengMei WangFrontiers Media S.A.articlelie detectioneye behaviorquestionnaire surveysdeceptioneye-trackingPsychologyBF1-990ENFrontiers in Psychology, Vol 12 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	lie detection eye behavior questionnaire surveys deception eye-tracking Psychology BF1-990
spellingShingle	lie detection eye behavior questionnaire surveys deception eye-tracking Psychology BF1-990 Xinyue Fang Yiteng Sun Xinyi Zheng Xinrong Wang Xuemei Deng Mei Wang Assessing Deception in Questionnaire Surveys With Eye-Tracking
description	Deceit often occurs in questionnaire surveys, which leads to the misreporting of data and poor reliability. The purpose of this study is to explore whether eye-tracking could contribute to the detection of deception in questionnaire surveys, and whether the eye behaviors that appeared in instructed lying still exist in spontaneous lying. Two studies were conducted to explore eye movement behaviors in instructed and spontaneous lying conditions. The results showed that pupil size and fixation behaviors are both reliable indicators to detect lies in questionnaire surveys. Blink and saccade behaviors do not seem to predict deception. Deception resulted in increased pupil size, fixation count and duration. Meanwhile, respondents focused on different areas of the questionnaire when lying versus telling the truth. Furthermore, in the actual deception situation, the linear support vector machine (SVM) deception classifier achieved an accuracy of 74.09%. In sum, this study indicates the eye-tracking signatures of lying are not restricted to instructed deception, demonstrates the potential of using eye-tracking to detect deception in questionnaire surveys, and contributes to the questionnaire surveys of sensitive issues.
format	article
author	Xinyue Fang Yiteng Sun Xinyi Zheng Xinrong Wang Xuemei Deng Mei Wang
author_facet	Xinyue Fang Yiteng Sun Xinyi Zheng Xinrong Wang Xuemei Deng Mei Wang
author_sort	Xinyue Fang
title	Assessing Deception in Questionnaire Surveys With Eye-Tracking
title_short	Assessing Deception in Questionnaire Surveys With Eye-Tracking
title_full	Assessing Deception in Questionnaire Surveys With Eye-Tracking
title_fullStr	Assessing Deception in Questionnaire Surveys With Eye-Tracking
title_full_unstemmed	Assessing Deception in Questionnaire Surveys With Eye-Tracking
title_sort	assessing deception in questionnaire surveys with eye-tracking
publisher	Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/e851c10e42ae40fe897bd59887287483
work_keys_str_mv	AT xinyuefang assessingdeceptioninquestionnairesurveyswitheyetracking AT yitengsun assessingdeceptioninquestionnairesurveyswitheyetracking AT xinyizheng assessingdeceptioninquestionnairesurveyswitheyetracking AT xinrongwang assessingdeceptioninquestionnairesurveyswitheyetracking AT xuemeideng assessingdeceptioninquestionnairesurveyswitheyetracking AT meiwang assessingdeceptioninquestionnairesurveyswitheyetracking
_version_	1718417889096105984

Assessing Deception in Questionnaire Surveys With Eye-Tracking

Ejemplares similares