Comparative evaluation of classical inferior alveolar nerve block and gow-gates nerve block for surgical removal of mandibular third molar: A prospective study

Background: The most commonly used nerve block procedure to anesthetize the mandibular arch is the classical inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). In 1973, Gow-Gates developed a new procedure known as the Gow Gates nerve block, to achieve anesthesia in the same area with fewer complications. Methodo...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Abhilash Mathews Thomas, Ummar Mangalath, Roshni Abida, Sachin Aslam, Sooraj Soman, Rakesh B Nair
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021
Materias:	impacted tooth mandible mandibular nerve nerve block Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/e870a38a39ab43f393f17e9ffb2e4f8b
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:e870a38a39ab43f393f17e9ffb2e4f8b
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:e870a38a39ab43f393f17e9ffb2e4f8b2021-11-19T12:15:52ZComparative evaluation of classical inferior alveolar nerve block and gow-gates nerve block for surgical removal of mandibular third molar: A prospective study0975-740610.4103/jpbs.jpbs_279_21https://doaj.org/article/e870a38a39ab43f393f17e9ffb2e4f8b2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=6;spage=1011;epage=1014;aulast=Thomashttps://doaj.org/toc/0975-7406Background: The most commonly used nerve block procedure to anesthetize the mandibular arch is the classical inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). In 1973, Gow-Gates developed a new procedure known as the Gow Gates nerve block, to achieve anesthesia in the same area with fewer complications. Methodology: The study comprised 80 patients who reported for the surgical removal of impacted third molar. The patients were randomly assigned into two groups– Group I received Gow-gates nerve block and Group II were administered classical IANB. Positive aspiration, meantime for the onset of anesthesia, mouth opening before and after each block and pain during the surgical procedure were compared. Results: Group 1 yielded positive aspiration in 2.5% of the cases (one patient) and 15% had positive aspiration in Group 2 (six patient). The mean time taken for onset of anesthesia was 6.16 min in Group 1 as compared to 2.78 min in Group 2. While comparing the quality of anesthesia between the blocks, 87.5% of the patients in Group 1 and Group 2 had successful anesthesia equally i.e., 35 of the 40 patients fell into category 1 and 2 of the eight-point category rating scale in both the groups and the remaining five patients (12.5%) in both the groups had unsuccessful anesthesia. Conclusion: Both approaches offer quality anesthesia in the posterior mandibular area when meticulously followed. The percentage of unsuccessful anesthesia in the Gow-Gates group could be attributed to the inexperience of the operator. Postoperative comfort and patient satisfaction were greater in the other group.Abhilash Mathews ThomasUmmar MangalathRoshni AbidaSachin AslamSooraj SomanRakesh B NairWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsarticleimpacted toothmandiblemandibular nervenerve blockPharmacy and materia medicaRS1-441Analytical chemistryQD71-142ENJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, Vol 13, Iss 6, Pp 1011-1014 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	impacted tooth mandible mandibular nerve nerve block Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142
spellingShingle	impacted tooth mandible mandibular nerve nerve block Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142 Abhilash Mathews Thomas Ummar Mangalath Roshni Abida Sachin Aslam Sooraj Soman Rakesh B Nair Comparative evaluation of classical inferior alveolar nerve block and gow-gates nerve block for surgical removal of mandibular third molar: A prospective study
description	Background: The most commonly used nerve block procedure to anesthetize the mandibular arch is the classical inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). In 1973, Gow-Gates developed a new procedure known as the Gow Gates nerve block, to achieve anesthesia in the same area with fewer complications. Methodology: The study comprised 80 patients who reported for the surgical removal of impacted third molar. The patients were randomly assigned into two groups– Group I received Gow-gates nerve block and Group II were administered classical IANB. Positive aspiration, meantime for the onset of anesthesia, mouth opening before and after each block and pain during the surgical procedure were compared. Results: Group 1 yielded positive aspiration in 2.5% of the cases (one patient) and 15% had positive aspiration in Group 2 (six patient). The mean time taken for onset of anesthesia was 6.16 min in Group 1 as compared to 2.78 min in Group 2. While comparing the quality of anesthesia between the blocks, 87.5% of the patients in Group 1 and Group 2 had successful anesthesia equally i.e., 35 of the 40 patients fell into category 1 and 2 of the eight-point category rating scale in both the groups and the remaining five patients (12.5%) in both the groups had unsuccessful anesthesia. Conclusion: Both approaches offer quality anesthesia in the posterior mandibular area when meticulously followed. The percentage of unsuccessful anesthesia in the Gow-Gates group could be attributed to the inexperience of the operator. Postoperative comfort and patient satisfaction were greater in the other group.
format	article
author	Abhilash Mathews Thomas Ummar Mangalath Roshni Abida Sachin Aslam Sooraj Soman Rakesh B Nair
author_facet	Abhilash Mathews Thomas Ummar Mangalath Roshni Abida Sachin Aslam Sooraj Soman Rakesh B Nair
author_sort	Abhilash Mathews Thomas
title	Comparative evaluation of classical inferior alveolar nerve block and gow-gates nerve block for surgical removal of mandibular third molar: A prospective study
title_short	Comparative evaluation of classical inferior alveolar nerve block and gow-gates nerve block for surgical removal of mandibular third molar: A prospective study
title_full	Comparative evaluation of classical inferior alveolar nerve block and gow-gates nerve block for surgical removal of mandibular third molar: A prospective study
title_fullStr	Comparative evaluation of classical inferior alveolar nerve block and gow-gates nerve block for surgical removal of mandibular third molar: A prospective study
title_full_unstemmed	Comparative evaluation of classical inferior alveolar nerve block and gow-gates nerve block for surgical removal of mandibular third molar: A prospective study
title_sort	comparative evaluation of classical inferior alveolar nerve block and gow-gates nerve block for surgical removal of mandibular third molar: a prospective study
publisher	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/e870a38a39ab43f393f17e9ffb2e4f8b
work_keys_str_mv	AT abhilashmathewsthomas comparativeevaluationofclassicalinferioralveolarnerveblockandgowgatesnerveblockforsurgicalremovalofmandibularthirdmolaraprospectivestudy AT ummarmangalath comparativeevaluationofclassicalinferioralveolarnerveblockandgowgatesnerveblockforsurgicalremovalofmandibularthirdmolaraprospectivestudy AT roshniabida comparativeevaluationofclassicalinferioralveolarnerveblockandgowgatesnerveblockforsurgicalremovalofmandibularthirdmolaraprospectivestudy AT sachinaslam comparativeevaluationofclassicalinferioralveolarnerveblockandgowgatesnerveblockforsurgicalremovalofmandibularthirdmolaraprospectivestudy AT soorajsoman comparativeevaluationofclassicalinferioralveolarnerveblockandgowgatesnerveblockforsurgicalremovalofmandibularthirdmolaraprospectivestudy AT rakeshbnair comparativeevaluationofclassicalinferioralveolarnerveblockandgowgatesnerveblockforsurgicalremovalofmandibularthirdmolaraprospectivestudy
_version_	1718420166222544896

Comparative evaluation of classical inferior alveolar nerve block and gow-gates nerve block for surgical removal of mandibular third molar: A prospective study

Ejemplares similares